AUTHOR REPLY
Ahead of print publication  

Re: Commentary on “A modified fixation technique for the cure of buried penis in children”


1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China
2 Central Sterile Supply Department, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Fuzhou 350001, China

Date of Submission03-Mar-2022
Date of Acceptance25-Mar-2022
Date of Web Publication17-May-2022

Correspondence Address:
Chao-Ming Zhou,
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001
China

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/aja202229


Article in PDF

How to cite this URL:
Cui X, Gao BJ, Chen L, Huang WH, Zhou CM. Re: Commentary on “A modified fixation technique for the cure of buried penis in children”. Asian J Androl [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2022 Nov 30]. Available from: https://www.ajandrology.com/preprintarticle.asp?id=345328

Xu Cui, Bing-Jing Gao
These authors contributed equally to this work.


In this article, we respond to the comments by Gereta et al.[1] on our modified fixation method for congenital buried penis of children.

Buried penis is not only associated with the shape and exposed length of the penis, but it is much more important that it may lead to serious psychological problems of children, for example self-confidence, self-esteem, and gender awareness. When it has been diagnosed, pediatric urologist should do the operation for these children and make the improvement on cosmetic of the penis.

We present an evaluation of the short-term improvement of our modified fixation method after penile surgery. Most literature has a range of follow-up time. For example, Murakami et al.[2] set postoperative follow-up time as 0.1–17.5 years. In addition, according to our observed results, the period from 6 months to 1 year after surgery is the period with high incidence of postoperative penile retraction and cicatricial contraction. The selecting of this period is meaningful for the evaluation of postoperative short-term complications. We have been working on the assessment of long-term outcomes and complications and found that the modified fixation method is still superior to the traditional fixation method over longer follow-up periods. We have carried out this work for longer than 4 years. Until now, there is no erectile pain, length problems, or penile trapping phenomenon observed in the group of the modified method.

Indeed, the penile and foreskin conditions of children with buried penis vary from person to person, and there is no absolute “gold standard” surgical approach to solve all problems. However, most forms of buried penis of children can be cured by our relatively simple fixation method. Our clinical experience and data can be used to confirm our theory.


  Author Contributions Top


All authors participated in the writing, critical revision, and final approval of the reply.


  Competing Interests Top


All authors declare no competing interests.



 
  References Top

1.
Gereta S, Tijerina AN, Belbina SH, Osterberg EC. Commentary on “A modified fixation technique for the cure of buried penis in children”. Asian J Androl 2022; Doi: 10.4103/aja202216. [Online ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Murakami H, Yazaki Y, Seo S, Ochi T, Okawada M, et al. A single surgeon's experience of 65 cases of penoplasty for congenital megaprepuce, with special reference to mid- to long-term follow-up. Pediatr Surg Int 2015; 31: 89–92.  Back to cited text no. 2
    




 

 
Top
 
 
  Search
 
 Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Cui X
    -  Gao BJ
    -  Chen L
    -  Huang WH
    -  Zhou CM
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Author Contributions
Competing Interests
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1187    
    PDF Downloaded116    

Recommend this journal