REVIEW
Ahead of Print

Management of residual penile curvature after penile prosthesis placement


1 Central District Hospital, Outpatient Department, Kamenolomni, Rostov Region 346480, Russia
2 University College London St Peter's Andrology Centre and University College London Hospitals, London W1G 6BJ, United Kingdom
3 Monash University, Department of Surgery, Melbourne 3168, Australia
4 The Alfred Hospital, Department of Urology, Melbourne 3004, Australia
5 Department of Urology 1, City Clinical Hospital No. 4, Dnipro 49102, Ukraine
6 Department of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo 24125, Italy
7 Department of Surgery No. 1, Rostov Regional Hospital ROKB 1, Rostov-on-Don 344015, Russia

Correspondence Address:
Denis V Krakhotkin,
Central District Hospital, Outpatient Department, Kamenolomni, Rostov Region 346480,
Russia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_62_20

PMID: 33106463

Residual penile curvature is a common situation following the implantation of a penile prosthesis in patients with Peyronie's disease. Currently, there is a variety of options for the correction of residual curvature, including penile modeling, plication techniques, as well as tunical incision/excision with or without grafting. A literature search of PubMed and Medline databases was conducted from 1964 until 2020, using search terms for all articles in the English language. In this article, we provide a review of the techniques and the outcomes, according to the published literature.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]
Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Krakhotkin DV
    -  Ralph DJ
    -  Blecher GA
    -  Chernylovskyi VA
    -  Greco F
    -  Bakurov EE
    -  Bugaev RA
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed447    
    PDF Downloaded33    

Recommend this journal