Table of Contents  
REVIEW
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 335-347

Viral infections and implications for male reproductive health


1 Androscience, Science and Innovation Center in Andrology and High-Complex Clinical and Research Andrology Laboratory, São Paulo 04534-011, SP, Brazil
2 Division of Urology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
3 Men's Health Study Group, Institute for Advanced Studies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-060, SP, Brazil
4 Division of Urology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Amapa, Macapa 68903-419, AP, Brazil
5 Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
6 BIAS – Brazilian Image Autopsy Study Group, Department of Pathology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
7 ANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas 13075-460, SP, Brazil
8 Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-968, SP, Brazil
9 Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
10 GReD Institute, CNRS-INSERM-Université Clermont Auvergne, Faculty of Medicine, Clermont-Ferrand 63000, France
11 Reproductive Toxicology Unit, Department of Pathology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil

Date of Submission17-Aug-2020
Date of Acceptance02-Nov-2020
Date of Web Publication15-Jan-2021

Correspondence Address:
Joël R Drevet
GReD Institute, CNRS-INSERM-Université Clermont Auvergne, Faculty of Medicine, Clermont-Ferrand 63000
France
Jorge Hallak
Androscience, Science and Innovation Center in Andrology and High-Complex Clinical and Research Andrology Laboratory, São Paulo 04534-011, SP; Division of Urology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, SP; Men’s Health Study Group, Institute for Advanced Studies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-060, SP; Reproductive Toxicology Unit, Department of Pathology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, SP
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_82_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Viral infections have haunted humankind since times immemorial. Overpopulation, globalization, and extensive deforestation have created an ideal environment for a viral spread with unknown and multiple shedding routes. Many viruses can infect the male reproductive tract, with potential adverse consequences to male reproductive health, including infertility and cancer. Moreover, some genital tract viral infections can be sexually transmitted, potentially impacting the resulting offspring's health. We have summarized the evidence concerning the presence and adverse effects of the relevant viruses on the reproductive tract (mumps virus, human immunodeficiency virus, herpes virus, human papillomavirus, hepatitis B and C viruses, Ebola virus, Zika virus, influenza virus, and coronaviruses), their routes of infection, target organs and cells, prevalence and pattern of virus shedding in semen, as well as diagnosis/testing and treatment strategies. The pathophysiological understanding in the male genital tract is essential to assess its clinical impact on male reproductive health and guide future research.

Keywords: male genital tract; reproduction; semen; sexual transmission; sperm; testis; viral persistence; viruses


How to cite this article:
Teixeira TA, Oliveira YC, Bernardes FS, Kallas EG, Duarte-Neto AN, Esteves SC, Drevet JR, Hallak J. Viral infections and implications for male reproductive health. Asian J Androl 2021;23:335-47

How to cite this URL:
Teixeira TA, Oliveira YC, Bernardes FS, Kallas EG, Duarte-Neto AN, Esteves SC, Drevet JR, Hallak J. Viral infections and implications for male reproductive health. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 28];23:335-47. Available from: https://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2021/23/4/335/307430 - DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_82_20


  Introduction Top


Over the last 30 years, anthropogenic action on the environment has accelerated the incursion of potentially dangerous viral infections to humanity, sometimes taking on the character of a pandemic with devastating consequences.[1] The first cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in 1981 and the subsequent development of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) pandemic have alerted the international scientific community and society about the real threat posed by sexual microorganism transmission.[2],[3] Till date, 27 candidate viruses have been reported to exist in human semen. In most of them, the evidence concerning a possible sexual transmission is nonexistent or ambiguous.[4]

Since December 2019, a new viral disease has spread to 188 countries, infecting more than 35 million people and causing the death of over one million people worldwide over a 10-month period.[5],[6],[7] The current pandemic, called Coronavirus 2019 Disease (COVID-19), refers to the new coronavirus-2 associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-2), its causative agent. Unprecedented efforts were launched by the international community, governments, private and public research organizations, and civil society worldwide to find a viable medical treatment option and a large-scale vaccine.[8]

Deaths from SARS-CoV-2 occur not solely because of respiratory tract complications but also from multiorgan involvement with an essential component of microthrombotic and other vascular affections.[9],[10] Genitourinary organs such as the kidneys and the testis have molecular characteristics and express receptors in their cells that prioritize target organs for this new virus. That said, the understanding of the sexual transmission of the virus, testicular involvement with potential sperm function defects, and hormonal production imbalances in both acute and convalescent and recovered males warrant priority investigation.[11],[12]


  Overview of Viral Infections and the Male Reproductive System Top


Many families of viruses have a strong tropism for the male reproductive system, especially the testis, and about thirty different species can affect semen quality.[4],[13] In addition, some of these viruses can impair fertility and be sexually transmitted.[14] Our knowledge concerning the routes of infection of several viruses in the male genital tract is notably limited. In general, viral infections reach the testis through the bloodstream, causing damage by direct harmful effects on target organs or indirectly through pro-inflammatory cytokines.[15],[16] However, alternative routes to hematogenous spread exist, bypassing the epididymal immune capacity and contributing to viral dissemination in the reproductive system.[17],[18],[19] Viral translocation between the epididymis and testis has been documented from data obtained from studies involving simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected monkeys and micro-RNA-targeted viral Zika virus (ZIKV) clones in mice.[17],[18]

In addition to the public health consequences of the high infectivity and spread of many viruses, there is growing concern about the potential contamination of male reproductive organs and spermatozoa. Such contaminations may lead, inter alia, to male sub-fertility or infertility resulting from signaling deficiencies in testicular cells that may be aggravated by pro-inflammatory mediators, leading to clinical or sub-clinical hypogonadism. In females, oocyte and embryonic infection may cause miscarriages and even fetal losses or fetal abnormalities. Moreover, there is a potential risk of transmission to subsequent generations by incorporation of the viral genome into the germ cell or embryonic genomes.[14],[20] [Table 1] summarizes the main viruses known to be present in the male genital tract and their associated complications, and [Table 2] describes the main target organs of these viruses in the male reproductive tract.
Table 1: Viruses: taxonomy, clinical presentation, and effects on male reproductive health

Click here to view
Table 2: Viruses and target organs in the human male reproductive tract

Click here to view


Semen quality is considered an accurate biomarker of men's health.[21] However, several factors influence the presence of viruses in semen, including viremia levels, specific viral epitopes, immune replication mechanisms, viral structural stability, specific receptors of viral attachment to testis cells, and the presence of other sexually transmitted pathogens.[4] Additionally, different viruses target different cell types in the reproductive tract, and also the cellular response varies from species to species.[22] Thus, studies investigating the effect of specific infections on male reproductive health may be challenging owing to the high degree of specificity among the viruses and their hosts.[23],[24]

[Table 3] compiles the prevalence and pattern of virus shedding in human semen. In the next sections, we summarize the evidence concerning the presence and adverse effects of the most common viruses on the reproductive tract, their routes of infection, target organs and cells, prevalence and pattern of viral shedding in semen, and diagnosis/testing and treatment strategies.
Table 3: Prevalencea and characteristics of virus shedding in human semen

Click here to view



  Mumps Virus Top


Summary evidence

Mumps virus (MuV) is an enveloped, nonsegmented, negative-sense RNA virus, a member of the Paramyxoviridae family, with a high tropism for the human testis.[25] Typically, 15%–30% of postpubertal men develop epididymo-orchitis as a complication of mumps. In most cases, the condition is unilateral, resulting in a minor transient change in the sperm parameter values (e.g., decreased sperm count, morphology, and motility). However, 15%–30% of epididymo-orchitis is bilateral and causes testicular atrophy that progresses to infertility in 30%–87% of patients.[26],[27],[28]

Routes of infection and target organs and cells

Transient plasma MuV viremia leads to its hematogenous spread into different organs, including the testis.[26] The MuV has been isolated from testicular biopsy specimens of infected men,[29] but its testicular target cells and the complete mechanisms by which MuV infection damages the testis remain undefined. In vitro MuV replication is reported in human Leydig cells, causing impairment in testosterone production.[30] Data suggest that MuV-induced germ cell degeneration may be secondary to increased testicular temperature mediated by inflammatory mediators.[20] However, other mechanisms might also explain the observed cellular damage caused by MuV on the testis, including (I) modifications of the paracrine control of spermatogenesis exerted by testicular macrophages, Leydig, and Sertoli cells; (II) germ cell apoptosis induced by C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) production by infected Sertoli cells;[31] and (III) congestion of the seminiferous tubules precipitated by the interstitial edema.[32]

Prevalence and pattern of viral shedding in semen

In a case report, MuV was isolated from the semen using real-time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) 14 days after the onset of the disease, and MuV RNA persisted in semen for up to 40 days. The development of anti-sperm antibodies on day 84 may indicate testicular damage, although semen parameters recovered to average values.[33]

Diagnosis and testing

Mumps orchitis is a clinical diagnosis, rarely seen in children under 10 years old. It typically occurs 1 week to 2 weeks after parotitis.[34] Laboratory diagnosis relies on MuV culture, detection of viral RNA, or, more commonly, serological confirmation by measurement of immunoglobulin antibody levels.[26]

Treatment

There is no specific antiviral therapy for mumps, so treatment is primarily supportive (bed rest, scrotal support, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents).[26],[34] Steroids should not be prescribed for mumps orchitis because they can suppress testosterone production, which could ease, rather than alleviate, testicular atrophy.[35] Despite that, a potential treatment for mumps orchitis is the subcutaneous administration of interferon alpha-2b during 2–4 days, with no evidence of testicular atrophy reported during the follow-up period. In a case series of four patients, three had oligoasthenozoospermia that returned to normal levels 2–4 months after interferon treatment.[36] In another study with 13 patients treated with interferon, four men persisted with oligoasthenozoospermia, even without testicular atrophy.[37]


  Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Top


Summary evidence

HIV is a retrovirus capable of integrating its DNA into the host genome. This virus includes two main subtypes, HIV type 1 (HIV-1) and type 2 (HIV-2). HIV-1 presents with higher pathogenic potential and more prevalent than HIV-2.[38] AIDS patients infected with HIV-1 can develop chronic orchitis and, consequently, progressive hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, suggesting that testicular steroidogenesis is impaired.[39],[40] The clinical scenario involving orchitis, hypogonadism, and leukocytospermia explains alterations in semen parameters, mostly oligozoospermia and teratozoospermia, which accompany HIV infections.[41] The most common testicular histopathology observed in men who have died of AIDS is the presence of “Sertoli-cell-only” syndrome (43%), followed by germ cell damage (27%) and peritubular fibrosis (15%). In only 3% of individuals, did the testis remain normal in appearance.[42]

Routes of infection and target organs and cells

Sexual intercourse is the principal route of HIV transmission, with about 2 million new HIV infections each year resulting from this single shedding route.[43] The primary viral target is CD4+ T lymphocytes and some populations of macrophages and dendritic cell lineages expressing CD4 molecules. These molecules represent the central viral receptor, while CC-chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) and CXC-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) are the main HIV co-receptors.[44] Several clinical trials and epidemiological studies reported the importance of foreskin as an entry portal for HIV.[45],[46]m,[47],[48] However, other penile sites such as glans meatus, urethra, and even explants of the inner foreskin are susceptible to HIV-1 infection.[49],[50],[51] HIV RNA and leukocyte antigens are detected in the testis,[52] epididymis,[53] prostate,[53],[54] and seminal vesicles.[55] It is hypothesized that HIV-1 has a direct detrimental effect on Leydig cells, leading to interstitial tissue fibrosis and increased production of inflammatory cytokines that inhibit testosterone synthesis.[52],[56] In vitro studies demonstrated that HIV attaches to spermatozoa through heparin sulfate proteoglycans,[57] but there is no evidence of the virus's vertical transmission (spermatozoon to the fetus). A meta-analytic study, including 3994 women with HIV-infected partners who had undergone a total of 11 585 assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles, demonstrated that sperm-mediated HIV transmission never occurred following sperm processing.[58],[59]

Prevalence and pattern of viral shedding in semen

HIV load in seminal fluid is usually lower than that in blood, but there are reports of infected patients with an unusually high semen viral load.[60],[61] Various factors are associated with the persistence of HIV shedding in semen, including repeated sexual transmitted infections (STIs),[62],[63] blood HIV load,[62] co-presence of seminal cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Epstein–Barr virus (EBV),[64],[65],[66] and seminal cytokine levels.[63],[64] Even under efficient antiretroviral therapy and undetectable blood viral loads for several years, the persistence of HIV-1 DNA and RNA had been reported in some infected men.[67]

Diagnosis and testing

International guidelines usually recommend an initial screening test to be performed with a fourth-generation antigen–antibody assay. Positive results should be confirmed with an antibody assay to differentiate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections.[68],[69] This assay measures immunoglobulin levels (IgM and IgG) against recombinant proteins or synthetic peptides and monoclonal antibodies against p24.[38]

Treatment

HIV treatment aims to suppress viral replication and maintain plasma HIV-1 below detection levels by antiretroviral therapy (ARTx). The World Health Organization (WHO) endorses a first-line treatment that consists of a combination of two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors plus a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor or an integrase inhibitor.[70] Of note, it is hard to dissociate the direct impact of HIV-1 on male fertility from the possible ARTx gonadotoxic effects. The latter can affect sperm parameter values and lead to decreased total sperm count, progressive motility, and an increase in sperm counts with abnormal morphology.[41]


  Zika Virus Top


Summary evidence

Zika infection, transmitted by mosquitoes of the genus Aedes, is caused by an RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family. This infection has recently emerged partly owing to the spread of arthropod vectors into new deforested geographical areas, particularly in the Amazon and Atlantic Rainforest regions of Brazil.[1] ZIKV can be sexually transmitted, with worrisome public health implications, not only for people living or transiting in endemic areas but also for their sexual partners in nonendemic places.[71] ZIKV can cause orchitis, epididymo-orchitis, and testicular atrophy, resulting in infertility and hypogonadism in animal models.[72],[73],[74] Alterations in semen, including decreased total sperm count and an increase in sperm abnormalities up to 90 days after the onset of acute ZIKV infection, can cause infertility and might be explained by direct damage to the testis and epididymis.[75] Testosterone concentration remains unchanged during the acute-phase infection.[75]

Routes of infection and target organs and cells

Hematogenous spread probably corresponds to the ZIKV leading entry portal into the male genital tract.[76] In vitro and animal studies show that testicular and prostate cells are susceptible to ZIKV infection. However, the testes are the organs of choice for viral replication, capable of sustaining high viral loads for extended periods.[74],[77],[78],[79],[80],[81],[82] ZIKV replicates in human germ cells in vivo and within testis explants, basically composed of macrophages and Leydig, Sertoli, and peritubular cells.[79] Viral RNA has also been detected in the epididymis,[74],[80],[83],[84] vas deferens,[83] and seminal vesicles,[74],[81],[82],[84] in different animal models. In about 30% of affected spermatozoa, ZIKV was present primarily at the mid-piece of mature cells. The Tyro3 receptor is the viral binding and entry site in this cell.[78] As ZIKV is detected in motile spermatozoa, vertical transmission via spermatozoa is a real possibility that deserves further investigation.[75] Another possible route of vertical transmission is the exposure of the pregnant women to ZIKV-infected semen that can favor hematogenous spread and transplacental infection; a high viral load in the mother might be a significant risk factor for vertical transmission.[85]

Prevalence and pattern of viral shedding in semen

The prevalence of ZIKV shedding in human semen samples collected up to 30 days after symptom onset varies from 50% to 68%.[86],[87],[88],[89] Viral RNA remains positive in the seminal fluid until day 370 after the onset of systemic symptoms.[86] For ZIKV, the mean clearance time from semen is 25 days to 83 days compared with 5–15 days in the bloodstream.[86],[87],[88],[90] This prolonged virus shedding is influenced by host characteristics such as age, anejaculation, joint pain, and conjunctivitis.[87]

Diagnosis and testing

As clinical presentation of ZIKV infection is often nonspecific, diagnosis relies on nucleic acid detection by RT-PCR or serological testing.[91] RT-PCR for ZIKV-nucleic acids should be performed during the acute phase of the infection, with ZIKV DNA by RT-PCR detecting up to 14 days of symptoms onset in saliva and urinary samples, and up to 60 days in blood.[92] Currently, ZIKV serological diagnosis is debated, mainly owing to the cross-reactivity of ZIKV to sera of other flaviviruses (e.g., vaccination for Yellow-fever virus) and previous infection by other species within the Flavivirus family.[93]

Treatment

Clinical management of acute ZIKV infection is supportive care. Antiviral therapy and vaccine are under evaluation in clinical trials.[93] Prevention of sexual transmission is based on sexual abstinence or protected coitus in individuals with a suspected infection. Protected sexual intercourse for 2 months in females and 3 months in males is highly recommended.[92]


  Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Top


Summary evidence

HPV is a nonenveloped, double-stranded circular DNA virus, a member of the Papillomaviridae family.[94] It is the most common sexually transmitted virus in humans, with over 80% of the sexually active adults being infected by one HPV type at least once in their lifetime.[95],[96] HPV infections are clinically expressed by genital warts and are usually cleared by immune cells within a few months of acquisition. However, subclinical infections represent the majority of nonsuspected infections and are likely to spread the virus silently.[94],[97] Nonetheless, a small percentage of diseases of specific HPV subtypes can persist and progress to cancer, including penile cancer. Thus, the classification of HPV encompasses those at high risk (e.g., HPV-16, 18, 45) or low risk for cancer onset and development (e.g., HPV-6, 11), based on their oncogenic potential.[94] Among high-risk HPVs, HPV-16, HPV-18, and HPV-45 are involved in the pathogenesis of penile squamous cell carcinoma.[98] Few studies suggest that HPV can be a risk factor for prostate cancer aggressiveness.[99],[100] HPV is also responsible for specific alterations in semen quality, eventually leading to infertility.[101] The proposed mechanisms for male infertility associated with HPV infection include (I) direct modification of semen quality, (II) damage to sperm DNA integrity, and (III) production of anti-sperm antibodies that can interfere with sperm motility and sperm–oocyte binding.[13],[95],[102] The hypothesis of a direct viral effect on sperm is substantiated by the findings of high sperm DNA fragmentation rates and decreased progressive sperm motility in infertile men with asymptomatic chronic high-risk HPV infection.[103],[104]

Routes of infection and target organs and cells

HPV infects the stratified penile epithelium's basal cells and may take months or even years before squamous intraepithelial lesions can be clinically detectable.[105] HPV infection is mostly asymptomatic in men rather than in women. Still, the virus is easily found in almost all parts of the male reproductive system, including the urethra, vas deferens, epididymis, testicles, prostate, and seminal fluid.[14],[102],[106],[107] Vertical transmission through the spermatozoon is possible. Therefore, HPV can potentially be transferred to the embryo upon fertilization, thus impairing embryo development and invading trophoblast cells, potentially increasing miscarriage rates.[108],[109],[110] Conventional sperm-washing protocols rarely eliminate HPV, so it may be prudent to include HPV in the semen-screening panel prior to ART procedures.[111],[112]

Prevalence and pattern of viral shedding in semen

A meta-analysis of 31 studies comprising more than 5000 men, a part of the general population (HPV prevalence of 11.4%) and a part attending fertility clinics (HPV prevalence of 20.4%), reported that HPV in semen was associated with a two-fold increased risk of infertility. High-risk HPV-16 and 56 were the most common types in semen found in both populations.[113] Another meta-analysis also demonstrated high HPV prevalence in semen (16% in men with subfertility vs 10% in the general population).[106] In an analysis of HPV-infected men, the median duration of persistence of any HPV type was 15.3 months in semen samples.[114]

Diagnosis and testing

Genital warts are often diagnosed based on their clinical appearance, so the molecular tests for the presence of HPV are not usually necessary. However, one must keep in mind that up to 80% of male HPV infections are subclinical and can only be detected if inspection using magnification and 5% acetic acid are employed.[115] Histologic examination of biopsy specimens is recommended to rule out squamous cell carcinomas, mainly when the lesions are atypical and when the disease does not respond to or worsens during standard therapy, as in immunocompromised patients. In these situations, HPV-DNA testing should be performed to categorize the virus.[116]

Treatment

The recommended treatments for HPV genital warts consist of patient-applied regimens (e.g., imiquimod cream, podofilox solution or gel, and sinecatechins ointment) and physician-applied regimens (e.g., bichloracetic or trichloroacetic acid, cryotherapy, and surgical excision).[116] CO2 laser with magnification is one of the most successful and efficient methods to eliminate clinical and subclinical HPV lesions in the external genitalia.[117] Besides the evident advantage in terms of primary female disease prevention, HPV vaccines in men might help to prevent high-risk HPV infection diffusion, decreasing the risk of developing anal, cervical, and penile cancers.[115] In addition, it is suggested that HPV vaccination in infertile men has a protective role because it has been associated with lower detection of HPV DNA in semen, improved semen quality, increased pregnancy rates, and lower miscarriage rates.[118]


  Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Top


Summary evidence

HSV, a DNA virus, is one of the most common infections in humans. Genital HSV has two subtypes, namely, HSV-1, which causes recurrent ulcers in the mouth and sometimes in the genital area, and HSV-2, which has a tropism for the genital area.[119] HSV is detected in the semen and is likely to be associated with male infertility and abnormal semen parameters (e.g., low sperm count and motility).[14],[97],[120]

Routes of infection and target organs and cells

HSV is a sexually transmitted virus that infects the penile mucosa and induces a lifelong infection in humans.[121] HSV first replicates in keratinocytes and then infects nerve cells, where it rests latent. When reactivated, HSV returns to the epithelial surface to create vesicular lesions due to virus-induced cell death.[122] HSV-2 can infect almost all organs and tissues of the male genital tract, except the seminiferous tubules, owing to the protection conferred by the blood–testicular barrier.[20],[97] Sources of seminal HSV DNA have yet to be clarified, but it is currently accepted that HSV-2 can be internalized into healthy, motile spermatozoa, and are likely to cause direct sperm damage.[119] Therefore, HSV can be vertically transmitted through spermatozoa during ART, with a consequent increased miscarriage risk, and potentially adverse effects to the fetus and the newborn.[123]

Prevalence and pattern of virus shedding in semen

In chronic infection stages, the prevalence of HSV shedding in semen ranges from 0 to 10%, in studies performed in healthy men and co-infected by HIV.[64],[66],[124],[125],[126] In a study on HIV-infected men, half of the HSV-co-infected samples showed a continuous pattern of seminal shedding.[124]

Diagnosis and testing

Clinical diagnosis consists of identifying single or clustered recurrent vesicles that ulcerate before resolving in genitalia and adjacent areas, sometimes accompanied by fever, malaise, and local adenopathy in primary infections.[121] In the presence of active lesions, PCR assay is the method of choice for differentiating type-specific HSV. In contrast, serologic testing is useful when the medical history is suggestive. Still, there is no lesion, or the PCR assay is negative, or when the patient's partner is infected.[127]

Treatment

Treatment aims to reduce the severity, duration, and recurrence of the disease, and prevent transmission to uninfected partners.[121] Regimens are the same for both HSVs and are based on nucleoside analogs (acyclovir, famciclovir, and valacyclovir), whose mechanism of action is the inhibition of viral DNA.[127]


  Hepatitis B (HBV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) Viruses Top


Summary evidence

HBV and HCV viruses are present in the human semen and are active sexually transmitted.[97],[120] HBV is an enveloped DNA virus, a member of the Hepadnaviridae family,[128] whereas HCV is an RNA virus that belongs to the Flaviviridae family.[129] HBV is known to induce the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can cause lipid peroxidation (LPO) and subsequent sperm DNA fragmentation and increase the rate of chromosome mutations.[130] Patients chronically infected with HBV generally have reduced sperm motility, a higher proportion of necrotic spermatozoa, and abnormal sperm morphology.[131] Current data show an increased incidence and risk of infertility in men infected with HBV.[132] HCV infection is also associated with alterations in semen quality, including decreased sperm count, reduced motility, and abnormal sperm morphology.[133],[134]

In several studies comparing uninfected versus chronically HCV-infected men, hormonal imbalances, such as decreased serum levels of testosterone and inhibin B, as well as altered semen parameters, such as abnormal morphology and lower sperm motility, have been reported.[131],[133],[134],[135],[136],[137] It is noteworthy that treatment with ribavirin and interferon further worsened semen quality in HCV-infected patients.[133],[137] In chronically HCV-infected men, viral replication is associated with worsening of all sperm functional tests, including high levels of seminal ROS and high sperm DNA fragmentation.[135]

Routes of infection and target organs and cells

In areas of a low or intermediate prevalence of HBV, sexual intercourse is the most common way of dissemination.[138] The mechanism of entry into the genital mucosa has not yet been fully explained, mainly owing to the lack of an adequate viral cell culture system.[139] The target cells for HBV are the hepatocytes, lymphoid cells,[140] and specifically in the testis, the endothelial cells and fibroblasts.[141],[142] Spermatozoa can probably act as a vector for the transmission of HBV because HBV DNA has been detected inside them, directly damaging its structure.[143] A study has revealed that the frequency of sperm chromosomal aberration in an HBV-infected group was significantly higher (14.8%) than that in an uninfected control group (4.3%).[144] HBV can be vertically transmitted, and spermatozoa transfected with HBV are susceptible to apoptosis and have reduced fertilization capacity.[145]

By contrast, HCV-infected patients have a reduced viral load in semen, so the risk of transmission through sexual intercourse is low, accounting for about 5% of transmissibility, according to a few studies.[133],[146] Semen HCV is not associated with altered semen quality, suggesting that the virus does not have a significant direct deleterious effect on spermatozoa.[147] Vertical transmission of HCV has not been reported so far.[146]

Prevalence and pattern of viral shedding in semen

The prevalence of virus shedding in semen is around 68% in a population of chronically HBV-infected men.[148] In two case reports, HBV-DNA was still detected in semen 120 days after it was no longer detected in the serum.[149],[150] The prevalence of HCV in semen varies according to the stage of infection, ranging from 29% to 39% in early stages,[151],[152] and from 32% to 46% in chronic stages.[151],[152],[153],[154],[155] Studies with HIV–HCV-coinfected men reported a continuous seminal shedding pattern of HCV in 0–28% of samples.[153],[154]

Diagnosis and testing

Diagnosis of hepatitis B is based on a clinical presentation of acute hepatitis or cirrhosis, confirmed with a serological assay. The key serological marker of hepatitis B is the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in the patient's serum. The combination of different detected specific antigens–antibodies establishes the diagnostic state of acute/chronic disease, while the detection of HBV DNA indicates the standpoints for therapy and treatment monitoring.[128] Acute HCV infection usually occurs asymptomatically or less commonly as acute hepatitis. In around 80% of cases, the disease progress to a chronic infection that can culminate in cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma.[129] Different virological tests are used to diagnose HCV infection, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to detect anti-HCV serum/plasma antibodies and detection of HCV RNA to confirm active infection and evaluate the response to ART.[129]

Treatment

Medications used in HBV treatment are classified into two broad categories, the immunomodulatory and antiviral agents. The former comprises interferon α-2b and PEGylated interferon α-2a. The latter includes nucleoside or nucleotide analogs, such as lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, telbivudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and tenofovir alafenamide.[128] Only patients with detectable HCV RNA in the serum should receive ARTx. The main HCV treatment relates to direct-acting antiviral agents, mainly NS3/4A protease inhibitors, NS5B polymerase inhibitors, and NS5A replication complex inhibitors.[129]


  Ebola Virus Top


Summary evidence

Ebola virus (EBOV) is a linear, nonsegmented, single negative-stranded RNA virus from the Filoviridae family.[156] It causes a severe zoonotic spillover whose potential for the persistence of the virus in the semen of male survivors raises concern regarding the possibility of sexual transmission in nonepidemic geographical areas.

Routes of infection and target organs and cells

EBOV entries into the male genital tract via the hematogenous route primarily. EBOV antigens are found in testicular endothelial cells and seminiferous tubules.[157] Therefore, the testis is very likely to be an anatomic reservoir for EBOV persistence in humans.

Prevalence and pattern of viral shedding in semen

EBOV RNA can be encountered in the semen of survivors for up to 1178 days (median 158 days after the onset of the disease),[158] and sexual transmission from male survivors to female partners was identified in up to 470 days after the illness offset.[159]

Diagnosis and testing

Initial symptoms are nonspecific but progressive to hemorrhagic fever, and thus suspicion depends intensely on the epidemiologic surveillance data. Two different diagnostic tests are available, namely rapid diagnostic tests for detecting a viral protein and the RT-PCR to identify EBOV genomic material in various body fluids, including semen.[156] In semen during convalescence, higher viral loads proved by the detection of positive RNA RT-PCR suggest persistent active replication of EBOV within the male reproductive system.[160]

Treatment

During recent outbreaks, aggressive supportive care and ARTx improved outcomes. Favipiravir deployed a weak antiviral response against EBOV when there is a low viral load.[156] Male survivors should have their semen tested by RT-PCR 90 days after the onset of disease; those with positive results must use condoms or abstain from sex until the monthly semen PCR test is negative on two occasions.[161]


  Influenza Virus Top


Summary evidence

Influenza A virus is one of the most common infectious agents in the world. It was responsible for the 1918 pandemic that infected 500 million people and killed 50 million.[162] Over the past 100 years, four influenza pandemics have spread and ravaged humanity: Spanish H1N1 in 1918, Asian H2N2 in 1957, Hong Kong H3N2 in 1968, and H1N1 swine Influenza in 2009.[163] Influenza A virus circulates in the reservoir of wild birds and can crossbreed with several different species, sometimes requiring adaptive mutation, possibly using intermediate hosts, making influenza A a true paradigm for an emerging viral threat.[24] Acute infection with influenza virus has systemic implications and can alter semen quality. Decreased sperm motility and sperm count, as well as altered sperm morphology, have been reported and occur up to 4–11 weeks after febrile episodes.[164],[165],[166] There is also evidence that sperm DNA integrity may be compromised by influenza.[166],[167]

Routes of infection and target organs and cells

Influenza has never been detected in the male genital tract, and currently no studies have examined the presence of the viral receptor in the human genital system.[168] However, two nonmutual mechanisms have been postulated to affect testicular function negatively during systemic influenza infection: (I) fever-induced increase in testicular temperature, which is deleterious to the germ cell line, and (II) the orchitis that may result in systemic illness, which may impair exocrine and endocrine functions of the testis.[166]

Prevalence and pattern of viral shedding in semen

Neither the presence of the influenza virus in semen nor sexual transmission has been reported.[168]

Diagnosis and testing

Seasonal influenza ranges from asymptomatic presentation to fulminant illness, depending on the host and viral determinants.[24],[163] The most common symptoms include systemic features such as fever, myalgia, headache, chills, anorexia, and malaise, along with respiratory symptoms, including runny nose and nonproductive cough.[163] Clinical diagnosis is difficult to make and laboratory tests may be recommended, whenever possible, including specific culture, DNA testing, and antigen detection.[163],[169]

Treatment

Only four classes of antiviral drugs are approved for the treatment of influenza, namely adamantanes, membrane fusion inhibitors, neuraminidase inhibitors, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.[169],[170] Seasonal vaccination is undoubtedly the most effective method of disease prevention and control.[169]


  Coronaviruses (SARS-COV AND SARS-COV-2) Top


Summary evidence

Coronaviruses are a family of enveloped, strand-positive RNA viruses that infect vertebrates such as humans, bats, birds, cats, and livestock since times immemorial.[8] Within this family, there are three known viruses, one that causes in 2012 the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (still ongoing), which was named the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Related Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and two others that cause Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). These include the SARS-CoV, discovered in 2003, and the new SARS-CoV-2, responsible for the current and still uncontrolled outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.[8],[171] Almost all human coronaviruses are serologically related to one of the two primary strains, 229E and OC43, related to lower respiratory tract diseases. In a study of older adult patients hospitalized because of pulmonary illness and who tested negative for influenza and respiratory syncytial viruses, approximately 8% were positive for either human coronavirus OC43 or human coronavirus 229E.[172]

Genetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 reveals close similarities with bat coronaviruses, particularly the BAT CoVRaTG13 found in South China's Yunnan caves (96.2% similarity). However, the intermediate host remains uncertain.[173],[174],[175],[176] The SARS-CoV-2 genome has only 380 amino acid differences from its SARS-CoV equivalent, whereas 27 new mutations have been identified for the spike (S) protein responsible for cell–cell interaction and invasion. This mutation rate could explain the higher pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 than SARS-CoV, including its genitourinary tract effect, but further studies are warranted and urgently needed.[177],[178]

Routes of infection and target organs and cells

All coronaviruses bind their protein S to ectopeptidases for entry into cells. While MERS-CoV binds to dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4), angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is described as the host cell receptor for SARS-CoV and the novel SARS-CoV-2.[179] These two receptors are critical elements in the pathogenesis of the respective diseases, owing to their distinct distribution in different tissues and organs, thus governing potential lesions and their clinical manifestations.[180],[181] MERS-CoV has not been found in the human male reproductive tract and, therefore, it is not within the scope of this review.

The ACE2 link is only the first step of a regulated cell entry process for SARS-CoV-2. Indeed, the transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) is crucial for priming the S protein to increase the virus's entry after binding to ACE2.[182] Therefore, it plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of both SARS and MERS coronaviruses, the Asian H7N9 influenza virus, and several H1N1 subtype influenza A viruses.[183]

ACE2 receptors are expressed in alveolar lung cells, proximal kidney tubular cells and podocytes, and, in other organs, including the testes.[184],[185],[186] According to data obtained from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, the testicles have the highest expression of ACE2, while the highest expression of TMPRSS2 is found in the prostate.[187]

Theoretically, the testis should be highly susceptible to systemic SARS-CoV-2 infection owing to its high ACE2 levels.[11],[188],[189] ACE2 receptors are also present in Leydig cells and cells within the seminiferous tubules, including Sertoli cells and spermatogonia.[190] ACE2 is a physiological regulator of the male reproductive system, modulating steroidogenesis affecting germ cell development.[11],[185],[191] The prostate and bladder have a lower risk of local infection because, despite a high TMPRSS2 level, ACE2 expression is low.[187]

On the basis of the mass RNA expression data (from the Human Proteome Map) and the Protein Platform dataset (from the Atlas of Human Proteins), the testes exhibit moderate expression of ACE2 with little or no TMPRSS2 receptors.[192] Similarly, a descriptive analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data failed to demonstrate the co-expression of ACE2/TMPRSS2 in testicular cells, including spermatozoa, although Sertoli cells were underrepresented in the sample.[192]

Therefore, for the current COVID-19 pandemic, two questions remain to be answered, namely, (I) does SARS-CoV-2 replicate in the genitourinary organs, and (II) how does the high expression of ACE2 in genitourinary tissues contribute to the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2.[186],[193]

It is known that since the first global SARS outbreak linked to a coronavirus in 2003, testicular involvement was demonstrated.[194] In a small case series of six men who died of SARS-CoV infection in China, the testicular analysis confirmed that orchitis was a complication of the systemic disease, with germ cell destruction, few or no spermatozoa in the seminiferous tubules, basement membrane thickening, peritubular fibrosis, leukocyte infiltration, and vascular congestion in the interstitium.[194]

Testicular involvement has already been described during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In a single study presenting the results of first autopsies of COVID-19 in the metropolitan area of São Paulo, Brazil, orchitis with fibrin microthrombi was a common feature in postmortem testicular samples.[10] In another study, the examination of testes from 12 deceased COVID-19 patients demonstrated reduced Leydig cell count, significant seminiferous cellular injury, and mild lymphocytic inflammation. In contrast, direct evidence of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 occurred in just 10% of the testes studied.[195] In a series of patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms of COVID-19, six out of 34 (17.65%) men complained of some scrotal discomfort at diagnosis. However, orchitis was not confirmed by physical examination or Doppler ultrasound (US).[196] Besides, the presence of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 has not been established in testicular biopsy samples.[184],[194],[197],[198]

Therefore, from these preliminary results, two main nonmutually exclusive hypotheses are proposed to explain the pathophysiology of testicular injury caused by SARS-CoV-2. First, the virus reaches the testis hematogenously, and it affects the Leydig and Sertoli cells, creating alterations in the steroidogenic pathway and recruiting immune cells that might potentiate the pathogenic presentation of orchitis.[199] Other SARS-CoV-2 infection might indirectly interfere with testicular function, inducing a systemic “cytokine storm” as it is the case in other viral infections, such as the influenza virus, avian H5N1, and SARS-CoV.[186],[200],[201]

Regarding the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on testicular endocrine function, a study comparing hormone levels of 119 reproductive-aged infected men with 273 age-matched subjects in a control group reported a significant increase in luteinizing hormone (LH) and a decrease in serum testosterone/LH ratio in the COVID-19 group. The testosterone/LH ratio was negatively associated with white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein, probably reflecting an immunological injury to Leydig cells, provoking an early stage of transient hypogonadism.[12]

Prevalence and pattern of viral shedding in semen

Like SARS-CoV, there is no evidence of sexual transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but data concerning the presence of viruses in the human semen are minimal. A Chinese case series of 12 COVID-19 men reported no SARS-CoV-2 virus in semen samples with a median time of 78.5 days between semen collection and the symptoms' onset.[12] Another small case series of 34 men revealed that the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen was not reported in recovered patients. In this study, semen specimens were examined using RT-PCR 30 days or longer after the confirmation of COVID-19.[196] The authors hypothesized that the likelihood of testicular viral infection is small because <0.1% of all different testicular cells (including spermatozoa, spermatogonia, myoid, endothelial, macrophages, and Leydig and Sertoli cells) express both ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptors.[196] However, it is worth mentioning that all participants of both studies were evaluated several days after the acute phase of COVID-19, which may have influenced the chances of finding the virus. In a study on 12 infected men (aged 22–38 years old), almost all with mild disease, SARS-CoV-2 was absent in the semen in both acute and recovery phases of COVID-19.[198] In a German cohort study, 16 semen samples were recovered between 8 and 54 days after the absence of symptoms, two from active SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 14 from control healthy individuals. RT-PCR did not reveal an RNA virus in any samples (mean recovery time of 32.7 days). It is noteworthy to mention that men with moderate infection had impaired semen parameters compared with recovered and healthy men.[202] By contrast, in another small cohort study, SARS-CoV-2 was found in the semen of a subset of COVID-19 patients. The authors reported the virus's presence in 4 of 15 patients (26.7%) suffering from COVID-19, and in 2 of 23 convalescent patients (8.7%).[203] Despite these alarming results, an accurate description of the RT-PCR and semen collection methods utilized had not been provided.

In addition, the lack of information about viral load prevents a thorough analysis of its implications for sexual transmission. For example, the location of the virus has not been provided, and it is therefore speculative whether it could exist free in the seminal fluid, bound to the surface of the spermatozoa, or even internalized.[204] The virus is not known to be present in the seminal fluid. Thus, the possibility of eliminating the virus through washing procedures remains equivocal.[205],[206],[207] It is suggested that although SARS-CoV-2 might be found in the semen, possibly taking advantage of the privileged testicular immune environment, it would seem unlikely to replicate in the reproductive tract and be sexually transmitted.[208]

For MERS-CoV, the viral shedding in the seminal plasma of dromedary camels has been described.[209] Nonetheless, there is no evidence for the same phenomena in human semen.

Diagnosis and testing

The most common symptoms for both SARS and COVID-19 are fever, dyspnea, and dry cough. Common complications among hospitalized men include acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, acute kidney injury, and cardiac injury.[5],[6],[210],[211]

Laboratory diagnostic tests for SARS are based on RT-PCR assay for nasopharyngeal aspirate during the first 3 days. Retrospective diagnosis is confirmed with seroconversion on a virus immunoassay (enzyme-linked immunosorbent or immunofluorescence assay).[211] The diagnosis of the initial phase of COVID-19 is possible using RT-PCR collected by the nasal swab. In contrast, probable diagnosis is often based on the clinical scenario, serology testing, laboratory findings, and computed tomographic imaging.[210]

Treatment

Owing to the limited knowledge about these newly emerged viruses, many drugs are currently under evaluation and development to minimize the effects or combat SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Public health measures such as contact tracing, social distancing, proper hand washing, and face masks are imperative until the development of effective vaccines, chiefly for SARS-CoV-2 infection.[210],[211]


  Gaps in Knowledge and Future Perspectives Top


A growing range of virus families has been recently discovered in the male reproductive system, with potentially dramatic consequences for both the individual and public health. Understanding the pathophysiology of these viruses in the reproductive system is of utmost importance to prevent sexual transmission and protect male reproductive health. Preventative measures must be outlined for the current and future outbreaks, although many questions are still unresolved. Remarkably, the following issues seem to be the leading directions for future studies in this area.

The mechanisms underlying the harmful consequences of chronic viral infections on semen parameter values and male fertility statistics are broadly unknown, principally discriminating systemic from a more direct viral effect on the reproductive system. A better understanding of the infection routes and the male reproductive tract's target cells is critical for developing adequate strategies for treatment and prevention.

The semen as a vector for sexual and vertical viral transmission must also be studied further; nevertheless, the mere presence of viral nucleic acids in semen does not indicate infection. Further research should be aimed at detecting accurate viable viral loads and particles in semen capable of causing disease. Studies in this area should investigate potential and likely possible risks with the use of medically assisted reproduction and also anticipate future epidemics when the virus presents with efficient persistence mechanisms in the semen as ZIKV and EBOV.[86],[158] The immunosuppressive environment that protects spermatozoa from the autoimmune response might constitute an “invisible mantle” for some viruses, a hypothesis that warrants investigation.[208]

Lastly, it is indispensable to reveal some viruses' complex role in the etiology and the progression of such male genital cancers, such as penile, prostatic, and testicular. The presence of a human virome in the male genital system can elicit discoveries of viruses or a combination of them in some once-unsuspected asymptomatic men that could hide unhealthy conditions.[212]

Further studies of these viruses may provide useful information for a better understanding of the pathogenesis, routes of infection, and target tissues. Moreover, relevant research can elucidate the mechanisms of virus persistence in semen and confirm sexual and vertical transmission mechanisms. Thus, adequate and specific treatments can be developed either to cure or prevent possible sequelae in the male reproductive system, the partner, the offspring, and beyond benefiting future generations.


  Author Contributions Top


TAT and JH contributed to the design and data collection, conceived the manuscript, and wrote the first draft. YCO and FSB added to data collection. SCE contributed to the design and wrote sections of the document. EGK, AND-N and JRD wrote parts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


  Competing Interests Top


TAT, YCO, FSB, EGK, AND-N, JRD, and JH state that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could constitute a potential conflict of interest. SCE declares the receipt of unrestricted research grants from Merck and lecture fees from Merck.


  Acknowledgments Top


The authors thank Androscience, Science and Innovation Center in Andrology and High-Complex Clinical and Research Andrology Laboratory for providing a scholarship to TAT.



 
  References Top

1.
Reperant LA, Osterhaus A. AIDS, Avian flu, SARS, MERS, Ebola, Zika... what next? Vaccine 2017; 35: 4470–4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Gottlieb MS, Schroff R, Schanker HM, Weisman JD, Fan PT, et al. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and mucosal candidiasis in previously healthy homosexual men: evidence of a new acquired cellular immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med 1981; 305: 1425–31.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sharp PM, Hahn BH. Origins of HIV and the AIDS pandemic. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2011; 1: a006841.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Salam AP, Horby PW. The breadth of viruses in human semen. Emerg Infect Dis 2017; 23: 1922–4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020; 579: 270–3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020; 579: 265–9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20: 533–4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol 2020; 5: 536–44.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Dolhnikoff M, Duarte-Neto AN, de Almeida Monteiro RA, Ferraz da Silva LF, Pierre de Oliveira E, et al. Pathological evidence of pulmonary thrombotic phenomena in severe COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18: 1517–9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Nunes Duarte-Neto A, de Almeida Monteiro RA, da Silva LF, Malheiros D, de Oliveira EP, et al. Pulmonary and systemic involvement of COVID-19 assessed by ultrasound-guided minimally invasive autopsy. Histopathology 2020; 77: 186-97.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Fan C, Li K, Ding Y, Lu WL, Wang J. ACE2 expression in kidney and testis may cause kidney and testis damage after 2019-nCoV infection. medRxiv 2020. Doi: 10.1101/2020.02.12.20022418. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ma L, Xie W, Li D, Shi L, Ye G, et al. Evaluation of sex-related hormones and semen characteristics in reproductive-aged male COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol 2020. Doi: 10.1002/jmv.26259. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Liu WH, Han RQ, Wu H, Han DS. Viral threat to male fertility. Andrologia 2018; 50: e13140.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gimenes F, Souza RP, Bento JC, Teixeira JJ, Maria-Engler SS, et al. Male infertility: a public health issue caused by sexually transmitted pathogens. Nat Rev Urol 2014; 11: 672–87.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Bhushan S, Schuppe HC, Fijak M, Meinhardt A. Testicular infection: microorganisms, clinical implications and host-pathogen interaction. J Reprod Immunol 2009; 83: 164–7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Guazzone VA, Jacobo P, Theas MS, Lustig L. Cytokines and chemokines in testicular inflammation: a brief review. Microsc Res Tech 2009; 72: 620–8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Houzet L, Pérez-Losada M, Matusali G, Deleage C, Dereuddre-Bosquet N, et al. Seminal simian immunodeficiency virus in chronically infected cynomolgus macaques is dominated by virus originating from multiple genital organs. J Virol 2018; 92: e00133–18.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tsetsarkin KA, Maximova OA, Liu GP, Kenney H, Teterina N, et al. Routes of Zika virus dissemination in the testis and epididymis of immunodeficient mice. Nat Commun 2018; 9: 5350.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Voisin A, Saez F, Drevet JR, Guiton R. The epididymal immune balance: a key to preserving male fertility. Asian J Androl 2019; 21: 531–9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Dejucq N, Jegou B. Viruses in the mammalian male genital tract and their effects on the reproductive system. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2001; 65: 208–31.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Ventimiglia E, Capogrosso P, Boeri L, Serino A, Colicchia M, et al. Infertility as a proxy of general male health: results of a cross-sectional survey. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 48–55.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Nelemans T, Kikkert M. Viral innate immune evasion and the pathogenesis of emerging RNA virus infections. Viruses 2019; 11: 961.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Troy NM, Bosco A. Respiratory viral infections and host responses; insights from genomics. Respir Res 2016; 17: 156.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Long JS, Mistry B, Haslam SM, Barclay WS. Host and viral determinants of Influenza A virus species specificity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019; 17: 67–81.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Rubin S, Eckhaus M, Rennick LJ, Bamford CG, Duprex WP. Molecular biology, pathogenesis and pathology of mumps virus. J Pathol 2015; 235: 242–52.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Hviid A, Rubin S, Muhlemann K. Mumps. Lancet 2008; 371: 932–44.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Gazibera B, Gojak R, Drnda A, Osmic A, Mostarac N, et al. Spermiogram part of population with the manifest orchitis during an ongoing epidemic of mumps. Med Arch 2012; 66: 27–9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Casella R, Leibundgut B, Lehmann K, Gasser TC. Mumps orchitis: report of a mini-epidemic. J Urol 1997; 158: 2158–61.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Bjorvatn B. Mumps virus recovered from testicles by fine-needle aspiration biopsy in cases of mumps orchitis. Scand J Infect Dis 1973; 5: 3–5.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Le Goffic R, Mouchel T, Ruffault A, Patard JJ, Jegou B, et al. Mumps virus decreases testosterone production and gamma interferon-induced protein 10 secretion by human Leydig cells. J Virol 2003; 77: 3297–300.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Jiang Q, Wang F, Shi LL, Zhao X, Gong ML, et al. C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 produced by mouse Sertoli cells in response to mumps virus infection induces male germ cell apoptosis. Cell Death Dis 2017; 8: e3146.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Manson AL. Mumps orchitis. Urology 1990; 36: 355–8.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Jalal H, Bahadur G, Knowles W, Jin L, Brink N. Mumps epididymo-orchitis with prolonged detection of virus in semen and the development of anti-sperm antibodies. J Med Virol 2004; 73: 147–50.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Masarani M, Wazait H, Dinneen M. Mumps orchitis. J Royal Soc Med 2006; 99: 573–5.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Lane TM, Hines J. The management of mumps orchitis. BJU Int 2006; 97: 1–2.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Erpenbach KH. Systemic treatment with interferon-alpha 2B: an effective method to prevent sterility after bilateral mumps orchitis. J Urol 1991; 146: 54–6.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Ku JH, Kim YH, Jeon YS, Lee NK. The preventive effect of systemic treatment with interferon-alpha2B for infertility from mumps orchitis. BJU Int 1999; 84: 839–42.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Deeks SG, Overbaugh J, Phillips A, Buchbinder S. HIV infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2015; 1: 15035.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Poretsky L, Can S, Zumoff B. Testicular dysfunction in human immunodeficiency virus-infected men. Metabolism 1995; 44: 946–53.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Croxson TS, Chapman WE, Miller LK, Levit CD, Senie R, et al. Changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected homosexual men. J Clin Endoc Metab 1989; 68: 317–21.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Kushnir VA, Lewis W. Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and infertility: emerging problems in the era of highly active antiretrovirals. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 546–53.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Depaepe ME, Waxman M. Testicular atrophy in aids - a study of 57 autopsy cases. Hum Pathol 1989; 20: 210–4.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Royce RA. Sexual transmission of HIV. New Eng J Med 1997; 336: 1072–8.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Grande F, Occhiuzzi MA, Rizzuti B, Ioele G, De Luca M, et al. CCR5/CXCR4 dual antagonism for the improvement of HIV infection therapy. Molecules 2019; 24: 550.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Anderson D, Politch JA, Pudney J. HIV infection and immune defense of the penis. Am J Reprod Immunol 2011; 65: 220–9.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 369: 643–56.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med 2005; 2: e298.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet 2007; 369: 657–66.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Patterson BK, Landay A, Siegel JN, Flener Z, Pessis D, et al. Susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection of human foreskin and cervical tissue grown in explant culture. Am J Pathol 2002; 161: 867–73.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Ganor Y, Zhou Z, Tudor D, Schmitt A, Vacher-Lavenu MC, et al. Within 1 h, HIV-1 uses viral synapses to enter efficiently the inner, but not outer, foreskin mucosa and engages Langerhans-T cell conjugates. Mucosal Immunol 2010; 3: 506–22.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Fischetti L, Barry SM, Hope TJ, Shattock RJ. HIV-1 infection of human penile explant tissue and protection by candidate microbicides. AIDS 2009; 23: 319–28.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Rogers C, Klatt EC. Pathology of the testis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Histopathology 1988; 12: 659–65.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Nuovo GJ, Becker J, Simsir A, Margiotta M, Khalife G, et al. HIV-1 Nucleic-acids localize to the spermatogonia and their progeny - a study by polymerase chain-reaction in-situ hybridization. Am J Pathol 1994; 144: 1142–8.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Smith DM, Kingery JD, Wong JK, Ignacio CC, Richman DD, et al. The prostate as a reservoir for HIV-1. AIDS 2004; 18: 1600–2.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Deleage C, Moreau M, Rioux-Leclercq N, Ruffault A, Jegou B, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus infects human seminal vesicles in vitro and in vivo. Am J Pathol 2011; 179: 2397–408.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Anderson JA, Ping LH, Dibben O, Jabara CB, Arney L, et al. HIV-1 populations in semen arise through multiple mechanisms. PLoS Pathog 2010; 6: e1001053.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Ceballos A, Lenicov FR, Sabatte J, Rodrigues CR, Cabrini M, et al. Spermatozoa capture HIV-1 through heparan sulfate and efficiently transmit the virus to dendritic cells. J Ex Med 2009; 206: 2717–33.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Zafer M, Horvath H, Mmeje O, van der Poel S, Semprini AE, et al. Effectiveness of semen washing to prevent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission and assist pregnancy in HIV-discordant couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2016; 105: 645–55.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Pariz JR, Ranea C, Monteiro RA, Evenson DP, Drevet JR, et al. Melatonin and caffeine supplementation used, respectively, as protective and stimulating agents in the cryopreservation of human sperm improves survival, viability, and motility after thawing compared to traditional TEST-yolk buffer. Ox Med Cell Long 2019; 2019: 6472945.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Tachet A, Dulioust E, Salmon D, De Almeida M, Rivalland S, et al. Detection and quantification of HIV-1 in semen: identification of a subpopulation of men at high potential risk of viral sexual transmission. AIDS 1999; 13: 823–31.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Pasquier C, Walschaerts M, Raymond S, Moinard N, Saune K, et al. Patterns of residual HIV-1 RNA shedding in the seminal plasma of patients on effective antiretroviral therapy. Basic Clin Androl 2017; 27: 17.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Kalichman SC, Di Berto G, Eaton L. Human immunodeficiency virus viral load in blood plasma and semen: review and implications of empirical findings. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35: 55–60.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Politch JA, Mayer KH, Welles SL, O'Brien WX, Xu C, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy does not completely suppress HIV in semen of sexually active HIV-infected men who have sex with men. AIDS 2012; 26: 1535–43.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Lisco A, Munawwar A, Introini A, Vanpouille C, Saba E, et al. Semen of HIV-1-infected individuals: local shedding of herpesviruses and reprogrammed cytokine network. J Infect Dis 2012; 205: 97–105.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Gianella S, Mehta SR, Strain MC, Young JA, Vargas MV, et al. Impact of seminal cytomegalovirus replication on HIV-1 dynamics between blood and semen. J Med Virol 2012; 84: 1703–9.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Gianella S, Smith DM, Vargas MV, Little SJ, Richman DD, et al. Shedding of HIV and human herpesviruses in the semen of effectively treated HIV-1-infected men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57: 441–7.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Houzet L, Matusali G, Dejucq-Rainsford N. Origins of HIV-infected leukocytes and virions in semen. J Infect Dis 2014; 210: S622–30.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Gokengin D, Geretti AM, Begovac J, Palfreeman A, Stevanovic M, et al. 2014 European Guideline on HIV testing. Int J STD AIDS 2014; 25: 695–704.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
2018 Quick Reference Guide: Recommended Laboratory HIV Testing Algorithm for Serum or Plasma Specimens. This 2018 Document is to be Used in Conjunction with the 2014 Laboratory Testing for the Diagnosis of HIV Infection. Available from: http://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/aids/providers/testing/index.html. [Last accessed on 2020 Dec 22].  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. In: Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection: Recommendations for a Public Health Approach. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Polen KD, Gilboa SM, Hills S, Oduyebo T, Kohl KS, et al. Update: interim guidance for preconception counseling and prevention of sexual transmission of Zika virus for men with possible Zika virus exposure - United States, August 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018; 67: 868–71.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Ma WQ, Li SH, Ma SQ, Jia LN, Zhang FC, et al. Zika virus causes testis damage and leads to male infertility in mice. Cell 2017; 167: 1511–24.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.
Govero J, Esakky P, Scheaffer SM, Fernandez E, Drury A, et al. Zika virus infection damages the testes in mice. Nature 2016; 540: 438–42.  Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.
Clancy CS, Van Wettere AJ, Siddharthan V, Morrey JD, Julander JG. Comparative histopathologic lesions of the male reproductive tract during acute infection of Zika virus in AG129 and Ifnar-/- mice. Am J Pathol 2018; 188: 904–15.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.
Joguet G, Mansuy JM, Matusali G, Hamdi S, Walschaerts M, et al. Effect of acute Zika virus infection on sperm and virus clearance in body fluids: a prospective observational study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 1200–8.  Back to cited text no. 75
    
76.
Epelboin S, Dulioust E, Epelboin L, Benachi A, Merlet F, et al. Zika virus and reproduction: facts, questions and current management. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23: 629–45.  Back to cited text no. 76
    
77.
Spencer JL, Lahon A, Tran LL, Arya RP, Kneubehl AR, et al. Replication of Zika virus in human prostate cells: a potential source of sexually transmitted virus. J Infect Dis 2018; 217: 538–47.  Back to cited text no. 77
    
78.
Bagasra O, Addanki KC, Goodwin GR, Hughes BW, Pandey P, et al. Cellular targets and receptor of sexual transmission of Zika virus. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2017; 25: 679–86.  Back to cited text no. 78
    
79.
Matusali G, Houzet L, Satie AP, Mahe D, Aubry F, et al. Zika virus infects human testicular tissue and germ cells. J Clin Invest 2018; 128: 4697–710.  Back to cited text no. 79
    
80.
Chan JF, Zhang AJ, Chan CC, Yip CC, Mak WW, et al. Zika virus infection in dexamethasone-immunosuppressed mice demonstrating disseminated infection with multi-organ involvement including orchitis effectively treated by recombinant type I interferons. EBioMedicine 2016; 14: 112–22.  Back to cited text no. 80
    
81.
Osuna CE, Lim SY, Deleage C, Griffin BD, Stein D, et al. Zika viral dynamics and shedding in rhesus and cynomolgus macaques. Nat Med 2016; 22: 1448–55.  Back to cited text no. 81
    
82.
Hirsch AJ, Smith JL, Haese NN, Broeckel RM, Parkins CJ, et al. Zika Virus infection of rhesus macaques leads to viral persistence in multiple tissues. PLoS Pathogens 2017; 13: e1006219.  Back to cited text no. 82
    
83.
Kawiecki AB, Mayton EH, Dutuze MF, Goupil BA, Langohr IM, et al. Tissue tropisms, infection kinetics, histologic lesions, and antibody response of the MR766 strain of Zika virus in a murine model. Virol J 2017; 14: 82.  Back to cited text no. 83
    
84.
Duggal NK, Ritter JM, Pestorius SE, Zaki SR, Davis BS, et al. Frequent Zika virus sexual transmission and prolonged viral RNA shedding in an immunodeficient mouse model. Cell Rep 2017; 18: 1751–60.  Back to cited text no. 84
    
85.
Silasi M, Cardenas I, Kwon JY, Racicot K, Aldo P, et al. Viral infections during pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol 2015; 73: 199–213.  Back to cited text no. 85
    
86.
Barzon L, Percivalle E, Pacenti M, Rovida F, Zavattoni M, et al. Virus and antibody dynamics in travelers with acute Zika virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 66: 1173–80.  Back to cited text no. 86
    
87.
Mead PS, Duggal NK, Hook SA, Delorey M, Fischer M, et al. Zika virus shedding in semen of symptomatic infected men. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1377–85.  Back to cited text no. 87
    
88.
Huits R, De Smet B, Arien KK, Van Esbroeck M, Bottieau E, et al. Zika virus in semen: a prospective cohort study of symptomatic travellers returning to Belgium. Bull World Health Organ 2017; 95: 802–9.  Back to cited text no. 88
    
89.
de Laval F, Matheus S, Briolant S. Kinetics of Zika viral load in semen. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 697–9.  Back to cited text no. 89
    
90.
Paz-Bailey G, Rosenberg ES, Sharp TM. Persistence of Zika virus in body fluids - final report reply. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 198–9.  Back to cited text no. 90
    
91.
Baud D, Gubler DJ, Schaub B, Lanteri MC, Musso D. An update on Zika virus infection. Lancet 2017; 390: 2099–109.  Back to cited text no. 91
    
92.
Musso D, Ko AI, Baud D. Zika virus infection - after the pandemic. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 1444–57.  Back to cited text no. 92
    
93.
Koppolu V, Raju TS. Zika virus outbreak: a review of neurological complications, diagnosis, and treatment options. J Neurovirol 2018; 24: 255–72.  Back to cited text no. 93
    
94.
Gupta S, Kumar P, Das BC. HPV: Molecular pathways and targets. Curr Probl Cancer 2018; 42: 161–74.  Back to cited text no. 94
    
95.
Souho T, Benlemlih M, Bennani B. Human papillomavirus infection and fertility alteration: a systematic review. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0126936.  Back to cited text no. 95
    
96.
Chesson HW, Dunne EF, Hariri S, Markowitz LE. The estimated lifetime probability of acquiring human papillomavirus in the United States. Sex Transm Dis 2014; 41: 660–4.  Back to cited text no. 96
    
97.
Zea-Mazo JW, Negrette-Mejia YA, Cardona-Maya W. [Virus of sexual transmission: semen and virus relationship]. Actas Urol Esp 2010; 34: 845–53. [Article in Spanish].  Back to cited text no. 97
    
98.
Heidegger I, Borena W, Pichler R. The role of human papilloma virus in urological malignancies. Anticancer Res 2015; 35: 2513–9.  Back to cited text no. 98
    
99.
Glenn WK, Ngan CC, Amos TG, Edwards RJ, Swift J, et al. High risk human papilloma viruses (HPVs) are present in benign prostate tissues before development of HPV associated prostate cancer. Infect Agent Cancer 2017; 12: 46.  Back to cited text no. 99
    
100.
Yang L, Xie SH, Feng XS, Chen YH, Zheng TZ, et al. Worldwide prevalence of human papillomavirus and relative risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 14667.  Back to cited text no. 100
    
101.
Kohn JR, Gabrielson AT, Kohn TP. Human papilloma virus: to what degree does this sexually transmitted infection affect male fertility? Fertil Steril 2020; 113: 927–8.  Back to cited text no. 101
    
102.
Foresta C, Patassini C, Bertoldo A, Menegazzo M, Francavilla F, et al. Mechanism of human papillomavirus binding to human spermatozoa and fertilizing ability of infected spermatozoa. PLoS One 2011; 6: e15036.  Back to cited text no. 102
    
103.
Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Ventimiglia E, Pederzoli F, Cazzaniga W, et al. High-risk human papillomavirus in semen is associated with poor sperm progressive motility and a high sperm DNA fragmentation index in infertile men. Hum Reprod 2019; 34: 209–17.  Back to cited text no. 103
    
104.
Cao X, Wei R, Zhang X, Zhou J, Lou J, et al. Impact of human papillomavirus infection in semen on sperm progressive motility in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2020; 18: 38.  Back to cited text no. 104
    
105.
Stanley MA. Epithelial cell responses to infection with human papillomavirus. Clin Microbiol Rev 2012; 25: 215–22.  Back to cited text no. 105
    
106.
Laprise C, Trottier H, Monnier P, Coutlee F, Mayrand MH. Prevalence of human papillomaviruses in semen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 640–51.  Back to cited text no. 106
    
107.
Dunne EF, Nielson CM, Stone KM, Markowitz LE, Giuliano AR. Prevalence of HPV infection among men: a systematic review of the literature. J Infect Dis 2006; 194: 1044–57.  Back to cited text no. 107
    
108.
Foresta C, Noventa M, De Toni L, Gizzo S, Garolla A. HPV-DNA sperm infection and infertility: from a systematic literature review to a possible clinical management proposal. Androl 2015; 3: 163–73.  Back to cited text no. 108
    
109.
Garolla A, Engl B, Pizzol D, Ghezzi M, Bertoldo A, et al. Spontaneous fertility and in vitro fertilization outcome: new evidence of human papillomavirus sperm infection. Fertil Steril 2016; 105: 65–72.  Back to cited text no. 109
    
110.
Perino A, Giovannelli L, Schillaci R, Ruvolo G, Fiorentino FP, et al. Human papillomavirus infection in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization procedures: impact on reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 1845–8.  Back to cited text no. 110
    
111.
Foresta C, Pizzol D, Bertoldo A, Menegazzo M, Barzon L, et al. Semen washing procedures do not eliminate human papilloma virus sperm infection in infertile patients. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 1077–82.  Back to cited text no. 111
    
112.
Garolla A, De Toni L, Menegazzo M, Foresta C. Caution in the use of standard sperm-washing procedures for assisted reproduction in HPV-infected patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41: 967-8.  Back to cited text no. 112
    
113.
Lyu ZY, Feng XS, Li N, Zhao W, Wei LP, et al. Human papillomavirus in semen and the risk for male infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17: 714.  Back to cited text no. 113
    
114.
Capra G, Nyitray AG, Lu B, Perino A, Marci R, et al. Analysis of persistence of human papillomavirus infection in men evaluated by sampling multiple genital sites. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015; 19: 4153–63.  Back to cited text no. 114
    
115.
Cai T, Di Vico T, Durante J, Tognarelli A, Bartoletti R. Human papilloma virus and genitourinary cancers: a narrative review. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2018; 70: 579–87.  Back to cited text no. 115
    
116.
Park IU, Introcaso C, Dunne EF. Human papillomavirus and genital warts: a review of the evidence for the 2015 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61: S849–55.  Back to cited text no. 116
    
117.
Ferenczy A. Laser treatment of genital human papillomavirus infections in the male patient. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1991; 18: 525–35.  Back to cited text no. 117
    
118.
Garolla A, De Toni L, Bottacin A, Valente U, Ponce MD, et al. Human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccination improves reproductive outcome in infertile patients with HPV semen infection: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 912.  Back to cited text no. 118
    
119.
Wald A, Matson P, Ryncarz A, Corey L. Detection of herpes simplex virus DNA in semen of men with genital HSV-2 infection. Sex Transm Dis 1999; 26: 1–3.  Back to cited text no. 119
    
120.
Bezold G, Politch JA, Kiviat NB, Kuypers JM, Wolff H, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmissible pathogens in semen from asymptomatic male infertility patients with and without leukocytospermia. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1087–97.  Back to cited text no. 120
    
121.
Groves MJ. Genital herpes: a review. Am Fam Physician 2016; 93: 928–34.  Back to cited text no. 121
    
122.
Taylor TJ, Brockman MA, McNamee EE, Knipe DM. Herpes simplex virus. Front Biosci 2002; 7: d752–64.  Back to cited text no. 122
    
123.
Pallier C, Tebourbi L, Chopineau-Proust S, Schoevaert D, Nordmann P, et al. Herpesvirus, cytomegalovirus, human sperm and assisted fertilization. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1281–7.  Back to cited text no. 123
    
124.
Morris SR, Zhao M, Smith DM, Vargas MV, Little SJ, et al. Longitudinal viral dynamics in semen during early HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 64: 428–34.  Back to cited text no. 124
    
125.
Gianella S, Morris SR, Anderson C, Spina CA, Vargas MV, et al. Herpes viruses and HIV-1 drug resistance mutations influence the virologic and immunologic milieu of the male genital tract. AIDS 2013; 27: 39–47.  Back to cited text no. 125
    
126.
Osborne BJ, Marsh AK, Huibner S, Shahabi K, Liu C, et al. Clinical and mucosal immune correlates of HIV-1 semen levels in antiretroviral-naive men. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017; 4: ofx033.  Back to cited text no. 126
    
127.
Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015; 64: 1–137.  Back to cited text no. 127
    
128.
Yuen MF, Chen DS, Dusheiko GM, Janssen HL, Lau DT, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018; 4: 18036.  Back to cited text no. 128
    
129.
Manns MP, Buti M, Gane E, Pawlotsky JM, Razavi H, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017; 3: 17006.  Back to cited text no. 129
    
130.
Kang XJ, Xie QD, Zhou XL, Li FZ, Huang JH, et al. Effects of hepatitis B virus S protein exposure on sperm membrane integrity and functions. PLoS One 2012; 7: e33471.  Back to cited text no. 130
    
131.
Moretti E, Federico MG, Giannerini V, Collodel G. Sperm ultrastructure and meiotic segregation in a group of patients with chronic hepatitis B and C. Andrologia 2008; 40: 286–91.  Back to cited text no. 131
    
132.
Su FH, Chang SN, Sung FC, Su CT, Shieh YH, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection and the risk of male infertility: a population-based analysis. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 1677–84.  Back to cited text no. 132
    
133.
Durazzo M, Premoli A, Di Bisceglie C, Bertagna A, Faga E, et al. Alterations of seminal and hormonal parameters: an extrahepatic manifestation of HCV infection? World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 3073–6.  Back to cited text no. 133
    
134.
Lorusso F, Palmisano M, Chironna M, Vacca M, Masciandaro P, et al. Impact of chronic viral diseases on semen parameters. Andrologia 2010; 42: 121–6.  Back to cited text no. 134
    
135.
La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, D'Agata R, Calogero AE. Sperm DNA damage in patients with chronic viral C hepatitis. Eur J Inter Med 2012; 23: E19–24.  Back to cited text no. 135
    
136.
Hofny ER, Ali ME, Taha EA, Nafeh HM, Sayed DS, et al. Semen and hormonal parameters in men with chronic hepatitis C infection. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 2557–9.  Back to cited text no. 136
    
137.
Hofer H, Donnerer J, Sator K, Staufer K, Scherzer TM, et al. Seminal fluid ribavirin level and functional semen parameters in patients with chronic hepatitis C on antiviral combination therapy. J Hepatol 2010; 52: 812–6.  Back to cited text no. 137
    
138.
Inoue T, Tanaka Y. Hepatitis B virus and its sexually transmitted infection an update. Microbial Cell 2016; 3: 420–37.  Back to cited text no. 138
    
139.
Verrier ER, Colpitts CC, Schuster C, Zeisel MB, Baumert TF. Cell culture models for the investigation of hepatitis B and D virus infection. Viruses 2016; 8: 261.  Back to cited text no. 139
    
140.
StollBecker S, Repp R, Glebe D, Schaeffer S, Kreuder J, et al. Transcription of hepatitis B virus in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from persistently infected patients. J Virol 1997; 71: 5399–407.  Back to cited text no. 140
    
141.
Mason A, Wick M, White H, Perrillo R. Hepatitis-b virus-replication in diverse cell-types during chronic hepatitis-b virus-infection. Hepatology 1993; 18: 781–9.  Back to cited text no. 141
    
142.
Lang ZW. [Distribution of hepatitis B virus in testicle tissue in patients with hepatitis B infection]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 1993; 73: 329–31, 379. [Article in Chinese].  Back to cited text no. 142
    
143.
Hadchouel M, Scotto J, Huret JL, Molinie C, Villa E, et al. Presence of HBV DNA in spermatozoa - a possible vertical transmission of HBV via the germ line. J Med Virol 1985; 16: 61–6.  Back to cited text no. 143
    
144.
Huang JM, Huang TH, Qiu HY, Fang XW, Zhuang TG, et al. Studies on the integration of hepatitis B virus DNA sequence in human sperm chromosomes. Asian J Androl 2002; 4: 209–12.  Back to cited text no. 144
    
145.
Huang JH, Zhong Y, Fang XW, Xie QD, Kang XJ, et al. Hepatitis B virus S protein enhances sperm apoptosis and reduces sperm fertilizing capacity in vitro. PloS One 2013; 8: e68688.  Back to cited text no. 145
    
146.
Cassuto NG, Sifer C, Feldmann G, Bouret D, Moret F, et al. A modified RT-PCR technique to screen for viral RNA in the semen of hepatitis C virus-positive men. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3153–6.  Back to cited text no. 146
    
147.
Bourlet T, Lornage J, Maertens A, Garret AS, Saoudin H, et al. Prospective evaluation of the threat related to the use of seminal fractions from hepatitis C virus-infected men in assisted reproductive techniques. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 530–5.  Back to cited text no. 147
    
148.
Fei QJ, Yang XD, Ni WH, Pan CS, Huang XF. Can hepatitis B virus DNA in semen be predicted by serum levels of hepatitis B virus DNA, HBeAg, and HBsAg in chronically infected men from infertile couples? Andrology 2015; 3: 506–11.  Back to cited text no. 148
    
149.
Fagan EA, Alexander GJ, Davison F, Williams R. Persistence of free HBV DNA in body secretions and liver despite loss of serum HBV DNA after interferon-induced seroconversion. J Med Virol 1986; 20: 183–8.  Back to cited text no. 149
    
150.
Huysman A, Patel M, Dieterich DT. Hepatitis B: the immaculate infection. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2007; 3: 724–6.  Back to cited text no. 150
    
151.
Bradshaw D, Lamoury F, Catlett B, Applegate TL, McAllister J, et al. A comparison of seminal hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels during recent and chronic HCV infection in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals. J Infect Dis 2015; 211: 736–43.  Back to cited text no. 151
    
152.
Turner SS, Gianella S, Yip MJ, van Seggelen WO, Gillies RD, et al. Shedding of hepatitis C virus in semen of human immunodeficiency virus-infected men. Open Forum Infect Dis 2016; 3: ofw057.  Back to cited text no. 152
    
153.
Briat A, Dulioust E, Galimand J, Fontaine H, Chaix ML, et al. Hepatitis C virus in the semen of men coinfected with HIV-1: prevalence and origin. AIDS 2005; 19: 1827–35.  Back to cited text no. 153
    
154.
Pasquier C, Bujan L, Daudin M, Righi L, Berges L, et al. Intermittent detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in semen from men with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HCV. J Med Virol 2003; 69: 344–9.  Back to cited text no. 154
    
155.
Leruez-Ville M, Kunstmann JM, De Almeida M, Rouzioux C, Chaix ML. Detection of hepatitis C virus in the semen of infected men. Lancet 2000; 356: 42–3.  Back to cited text no. 155
    
156.
Nicastri E, Kobinger G, Vairo F, Montaldo C, Mboera LE, et al. Ebola virus disease epidemiology, clinical features, management, and prevention. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2019; 33: 953–76.  Back to cited text no. 156
    
157.
Martines RB, Ng DL, Greer PW, Rollin PE, Zaki SR. Tissue and cellular tropism, pathology and pathogenesis of Ebola and Marburg viruses. J Pathol 2015; 235: 153–74.  Back to cited text no. 157
    
158.
Sneller MC, Reilly C, Badio M, Bishop RJ, Eghrari AO, et al. A longitudinal study of Ebola sequelae in Liberia. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 924–34.  Back to cited text no. 158
    
159.
Schindell BG, Webb AL, Kindrachuk J. Persistence and sexual transmission of filoviruses. Viruses 2018; 10: 683.  Back to cited text no. 159
    
160.
Deen GF, Broutet N, Xu W, Knust B, Sesay FR, et al. Ebola RNA persistence in semen of Ebola virus disease survivors - final report. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1428–37.  Back to cited text no. 160
    
161.
Williamson DA, Chen MY. Emerging and reemerging sexually transmitted infections. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 2023–32.  Back to cited text no. 161
    
162.
Lemon SM, Mahmoud AA. The threat of pandemic Influenza: are we ready? Biosecur Bioterror 2005; 3: 70–3.  Back to cited text no. 162
    
163.
Paules C, Subbarao K. Influenza. Lancet 2017; 390: 697–708.  Back to cited text no. 163
    
164.
Macleod J. Effect of chickenpox and of pneumonia on semen quality. Fertil Steril 1951; 2: 523–33.  Back to cited text no. 164
    
165.
Buch JP, Havlovec SK. Variation in sperm penetration assay related to viral illness. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 844–6.  Back to cited text no. 165
    
166.
Sergerie M, Mieusset R, Croute F, Daudin M, Bujan L. High risk of temporary alteration of semen parameters after recent acute febrile illness. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 970.e1–7.  Back to cited text no. 166
    
167.
Evenson DP, Jost LK, Corzett M, Balhorn R. Characteristics of human sperm chromatin structure following an episode of Influenza and high fever: a case study. J Androl 2000; 21: 739–46.  Back to cited text no. 167
    
168.
Payne K, Kenny P, Scovell JM, Khodamoradi K, Ramasamy R. Twenty-first century viral pandemics: a literature review of sexual transmission and fertility implications in men. Sex Med Rev 2020; 8: 518–30.  Back to cited text no. 168
    
169.
Chow EJ, Doyle JD, Uyeki TM. Influenza virus-related critical illness: prevention, diagnosis, treatment. Crit Care 2019; 23: 214.  Back to cited text no. 169
    
170.
Ison MG. Optimizing antiviral therapy for Influenza: understanding the evidence. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2015; 13: 417–25.  Back to cited text no. 170
    
171.
Xu JB, Zhao SZ, Teng TS, Abdalla AE, Zhu W, et al. Systematic comparison of two animal-to-human transmitted human coronaviruses: SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Viruses 2020; 12: 244.  Back to cited text no. 171
    
172.
Falsey AR, Walsh EE, Hayden FG. Rhinovirus and coronavirus infection-associated hospitalizations among older adults. J Infect Dis 2002; 185: 1338–41.  Back to cited text no. 172
    
173.
Ji W, Wang W, Zhao XF, Zai JJ, Li XG. Cross-species transmission of the newly identified coronavirus 2019-nCoV. J Med Virol 2020; 92: 433–40.  Back to cited text no. 173
    
174.
Lu RJ, Zhao X, Li J, Niu PH, Yang B, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020; 395: 565–74.  Back to cited text no. 174
    
175.
Cyranoski D. Mystery deepens over animal source of coronavirus. Nature 2020; 579: 18–9.  Back to cited text no. 175
    
176.
Li XG, Zai JJ, Zhao Q, Nie Q, Li Y, et al. Evolutionary history, potential intermediate animal host, and cross-species analyses of SARS-CoV-2. J Med Virol 2020; 92: 602–11.  Back to cited text no. 176
    
177.
Wu A, Peng Y, Huang B, Ding X, Wang X, et al. Genome composition and divergence of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating in China. Cell Host Microbe 2020; 27: 325–8.  Back to cited text no. 177
    
178.
Benvenuto D, Giovanetti M, Ciccozzi A, Spoto S, Angeletti S, et al. The 2019-new coronavirus epidemic: evidence for virus evolution. J Med Virol 2020; 92: 455–9.  Back to cited text no. 178
    
179.
de Wit E, van Doremalen N, Falzarano D, Munster VJ. SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 2016; 14: 523–34.  Back to cited text no. 179
    
180.
Zhou J, Chu H, Chan JF, Yuen KY. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection: virus-host cell interactions and implications on pathogenesis. Virol J 2015; 12: 218.  Back to cited text no. 180
    
181.
Zou X, Chen K, Zou J, Han P, Hao J, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front Med 2020; 14: 185–92.  Back to cited text no. 181
    
182.
Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Kruger N, Herrler T, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 2020; 181: 271–80.e8.  Back to cited text no. 182
    
183.
Shen LW, Mao HJ, Wu YL, Tanaka Y, Zhang W. TMPRSS2: a potential target for treatment of Influenza virus and coronavirus infections. Biochimie 2017; 142: 1–10.  Back to cited text no. 183
    
184.
Gu J, Gong EC, Zhang B, Zheng J, Gao ZF, et al. Multiple organ infection and the pathogenesis of SARS. J Ex Med 2005; 202: 415–24.  Back to cited text no. 184
    
185.
Douglas GC, O'Bryan MK, Hedger MP, Lee DK, Yarski MA, et al. The novel angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) homolog, ACE2, is selectively expressed by adult Leydig cells of the testis. Endocrin 2004; 145: 4703–11.  Back to cited text no. 185
    
186.
Hallak J, Teixeira TA, Bernardes FS, Carneiro F, Duarte SA, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and its relationship with the genitourinary tract: Implications for male reproductive health in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Andrology 2020. Doi:10.1111/andr.12896. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 186
    
187.
Baughn LB, Sharma N, Elhaik E, Sekulic A, Bryce AH, et al. Targeting TMPRSS2 in SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95: 1989–99.  Back to cited text no. 187
    
188.
Guy JL, Lambert DW, Warner FJ, Hooper NM, Turner AJ. Membrane-associated zinc peptidase families: comparing ACE and ACE2. Biochem Biophys Acta 2005; 1751: 2–8.  Back to cited text no. 188
    
189.
Chen Y, Guo Y, Pan Y, Zhao ZJ. Structure analysis of the receptor binding of 2019-nCoV. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020; 525: 135–40.  Back to cited text no. 189
    
190.
Wang Z, Xu X. scRNA-seq profiling of human testes reveals the presence of the ACE2 receptor, a Target for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Spermatogonia, Leydig and Sertoli Cells. Cells 2020; 9: 920.  Back to cited text no. 190
    
191.
Pan PP, Zhan QT, Le F, Zheng YM, Jin F. Angiotensin-converting enzymes play a dominant role in fertility. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14: 21071–86.  Back to cited text no. 191
    
192.
Stanley KE, Thomas E, Leaver M, Wells D. Coronavirus disease-19 and fertility: viral host entry protein expression in male and female reproductive tissues. Fertil Steril 2020; 114: 33–43.  Back to cited text no. 192
    
193.
Perico L, Benigni A, Remuzzi G. Should COVID-19 concern nephrologists? Why and to what extent? The emerging impasse of angiotensin blockade. Nephron 2020; 144: 213–21.  Back to cited text no. 193
    
194.
Xu J, Qi LH, Chi XH, Yang JJ, Wei XH, et al. Orchitis: a complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Biol Reprod 2006; 74: 410–6.  Back to cited text no. 194
    
195.
Yang M, Chen S, Huang B, Zhong JM, Su H, et al. Pathological findings in the testes of COVID-19 patients: clinical implications. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 6: 1124–9.  Back to cited text no. 195
    
196.
Pan F, Xiao X, Guo J, Song Y, Li H, et al. No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen of males recovering from COVID-19. Fertil Steril 2020; 113: 1135–9.  Back to cited text no. 196
    
197.
Ding YQ, He L, Zhang QL, Huang ZX, Che XY, et al. Organ distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in SARS patients: implications for pathogenesis and virus transmission pathways. J Pathol 2004; 203: 622–30.  Back to cited text no. 197
    
198.
Song C, Wang Y, Li W, Hu B, Chen G, et al. Absence of 2019 novel coronavirus in semen and testes of COVID-19 patients. Biol Reprod 2020; 103: 4–6.  Back to cited text no. 198
    
199.
Verma S, Saksena S, Sadri-Ardekani H. CE2 receptor expression in testes: implications in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Biol Reprod 2020; 103: 449–51.  Back to cited text no. 199
    
200.
Fijak M, Pilatz A, Hedger MP, Nicolas N, Bhushan S, et al. Infectious, inflammatory and 'autoimmune' male factor infertility: how do rodent models inform clinical practice? Hum Reprod Update 2018; 24: 416–41.  Back to cited text no. 200
    
201.
Tisoncik JR, Korth MJ, Simmons CP, Farrar J, Martin TR, et al. Into the eye of the cytokine storm. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2012; 76: 16–32.  Back to cited text no. 201
    
202.
Holtmann N, Edimiris P, Andree M, Doehmen C, Baston-Buest D, et al. Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 in human semen - a cohort study. Fertil Steril 2020; 114: 233–8.  Back to cited text no. 202
    
203.
Li D, Jin M, Bao P, Zhao W, Zhang S. Clinical characteristics and results of semen tests among men with coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e208292.  Back to cited text no. 203
    
204.
Paoli D, Pallotti F, Turriziani O, Mazzuti L, Antonelli G, et al. SARS-CoV-2 presence in seminal fluid: Myth or reality. Andrology 2020. Doi:10.1111/andr.12825. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 204
    
205.
Vishvkarma R, Rajender S. Could SARS-CoV-2 affect male fertility? Andrologia 2020; 52: e13712.  Back to cited text no. 205
    
206.
Esteves SC, Lombardo F, Garrido N, Alvarez J, Zini A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and repercussions for male infertility patients: a proposal for the individualized provision of andrological services. Andrology 2020. Doi: 10.1111/andr.12809. [Epub head of print].  Back to cited text no. 206
    
207.
Hallak J, Esteves SC. Concise practice recommendations for the provision of andrological services and assisted reproductive technology for male infertility patients during the SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil. Int Braz J Urol 2020; 46: 1082–9.  Back to cited text no. 207
    
208.
Xia J. Does immune privilege result in recovered patients testing positive for COVID-19 again? Biosci Trends 2020; 14: 209–11.  Back to cited text no. 208
    
209.
Hemida MG, Waheed M, Ali AM, Alnaeem A. Detection of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in dromedary camel's seminal plasma in Saudi Arabia 2015-2017. Transbound Emerg Dis 2020; 67: 2609-14.  Back to cited text no. 209
    
210.
Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA 2020; 324: 782–93.  Back to cited text no. 210
    
211.
Peiris JS, Yuen KY, Osterhaus AD, Stöhr K. The severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2431–41.  Back to cited text no. 211
    
212.
Rascovan N, Duraisamy R, Desnues C. Metagenomics and the human virome in asymptomatic individuals. Ann Rev Microbiol 2016; 70: 125–41.  Back to cited text no. 212
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Reliability of the sperm chromatin dispersion assay to evaluate sperm deoxyribonucleic acid damage in men with infertility
Sandro C. Esteves,Carmen López-Fernández,Mercedes González Martínez,Ellen A. Silva,Jaime Gosálvez
Fertility and Sterility. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Testicular pathology in fatal COVID-19: A descriptive autopsy study
Amaro N. Duarte-Neto,Thiago A. Teixeira,Elia G. Caldini,Cristina T. Kanamura,Michele S. Gomes-Gouvêa,Angela B. G. dos Santos,Renata A. A. Monteiro,João R. R. Pinho,Thais Mauad,Luiz F. F. da Silva,Paulo H. N. Saldiva,Marisa Dolhnikoff,Katia R. M. Leite,Jorge Hallak
Andrology. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Overview of Vira...
Mumps Virus
Human Immunodefi...
Zika Virus
Human Papillomav...
Herpes Simplex V...
Hepatitis B (HBV...
Ebola Virus
Influenza Virus
Coronaviruses (S...
Gaps in Knowledg...
Author Contributions
Competing Interests
Acknowledgments
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4810    
    Printed167    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded514    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]