|
 
 |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2021 | Volume
: 23
| Issue : 1 | Page : 24-29 |
|
Next-generation sequencing: toward an increase in the diagnostic yield in patients with apparently idiopathic spermatogenic failure
Rossella Cannarella1, Rosita A Condorelli1, Stefano Paolacci2, Federica Barbagallo1, Giulia Guerri2, Matteo Bertelli2, Sandro La Vignera1, Aldo E Calogero1
1 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
2 MAGI EUREGIO, Bolzano 39100, Italy
| Date of Submission | 10-Nov-2019 |
| Date of Acceptance | 06-Apr-2020 |
| Date of Web Publication | 10-Jul-2020 |
Correspondence Address:
Rosita A Condorelli
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania 95123
Italy
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_25_20
A large proportion of patients with idiopathic spermatogenic failure (SPGF; oligozoospermia or nonobstructive azoospermia [NOA]) do not receive a diagnosis despite an extensive diagnostic workup. Recent evidence has shown that the etiology remains undefined in up to 75% of these patients. A number of genes involved in germ-cell proliferation, spermatocyte meiotic divisions, and spermatid development have been called into play in the pathogenesis of idiopathic oligozoospermia or NOA. However, this evidence mainly comes from case reports. Therefore, this study was undertaken to identify the molecular causes of SPGF. To accomplish this, 15 genes (USP9Y, NR5A1, KLHL10, ZMYND15, PLK4, TEX15, TEX11, MEIOB, SOHLH1, HSF2, SYCP3, TAF4B, NANOS1, SYCE1, and RHOXF2) involved in idiopathic SPGF were simultaneously analyzed in a cohort of 25 patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia or NOA, accurately selected after a thorough diagnostic workup. After next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, we identified the presence of rare variants in the NR5A1 and TEX11 genes with a pathogenic role in 3/25 (12.0%) patients. Seventeen other different variants were identified, and among them, 13 have never been reported before. Eleven out of 17 variants were likely pathogenic and deserve functional or segregation studies. The genes most frequently mutated were MEIOB, followed by USP9Y, KLHL10, NR5A1, and SOHLH1. No alterations were found in the SYCP3, TAF4B, NANOS1, SYCE1, or RHOXF2 genes. In conclusion, NGS technology, by screening a specific custom-made panel of genes, could help increase the diagnostic rate in patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia or NOA.
Keywords: azoospermia; next-generation sequencing; oligozoospermia; spermatogenetic failure
How to cite this article:
Cannarella R, Condorelli RA, Paolacci S, Barbagallo F, Guerri G, Bertelli M, La Vignera S, Calogero AE. Next-generation sequencing: toward an increase in the diagnostic yield in patients with apparently idiopathic spermatogenic failure. Asian J Androl 2021;23:24-9 |
How to cite this URL:
Cannarella R, Condorelli RA, Paolacci S, Barbagallo F, Guerri G, Bertelli M, La Vignera S, Calogero AE. Next-generation sequencing: toward an increase in the diagnostic yield in patients with apparently idiopathic spermatogenic failure. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 1];23:24-9. Available from: https://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2021/23/1/24/289431 - DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_25_20 |
| Introduction | |  |
According to the World Health Organization, oligozoospermia occurs when the sperm concentration is lower than 15 × 10[6] spermatozoa per ml or when the total sperm count is below 39 × 10[6] spermatozoa.[1] Notably, the prevalence of oligozoospermia has increased over decades since both sperm concentration and total sperm count have decreased by half in the last 40 years.[2]
Despite an extensive diagnostic workup, only a minority of patients with oligozoospermia receive a specific diagnosis; thus, the etiology often remains unidentified.[3] Genetic testing has been regarded as an important tool in severe male infertility diagnosis due to the high prevalence of genetic abnormalities in these patients.[4] Currently, structural or numerical chromosomal aberrations (e.g., Klinefelter syndrome, 47, XXY karyotype), microdeletions in the azoospermia factor (AZF) region of the long arm of the Y chromosome, or mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene in obstructive azoospermia are performed in clinical practice.[5] However, data from the German Database Androbase[6] reveal that a causal genetic diagnosis is recognized only in approximately 4% of patients with unexplained oligozoospermia and in 20% of patients with azoospermia.[7]
Human spermatogenesis is a 74-day-long complex process taking place in the seminiferous tubules by which diploid cells develop into haploid mature spermatozoa.[8],[9] It is thought to be orchestrated by up to 2000 genes. Among them, 600–900 genes are exclusively expressed by male germline cells.[10],[11],[12],[13]
Recently, several monogenic causes of spermatogenic failure (SPGF) have been described, and overall, up to 60 candidate genes have allegedly been involved in human sperm number, motility, and/or morphological defects.[14] Current evidence is mainly based on case reports or case series, although several studies that have investigated the prevalence of monogenic forms of SPGF are available.[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] However, such prevalence has mostly been explored by the research of a specific single-gene mutation among a cohort of patients with apparently idiopathic oligozoospermia, while the investigation of a broad panel of genes has not been performed so far.
Preliminary data suggest that their recognition in clinical practice would be promising. Accordingly, the analysis of testis-expressed 11 (TEX11), nuclear receptor subfamily 5, group A, member 1 (NR5A1), and doublesex- and MAB3-related transcription factor 1 (DMRT1) genes in a cohort of 80 patients with nonobstructive idiopathic azoospermia (NOA), no karyotype alterations, and no Yq AZF microdeletions, led to the discovery of likely pathogenic mutations in 4 patients (i.e., 5% of all cohort), raising the diagnostic rate up to 25%.[7]
We recently reviewed all the monogenic causes of SPGF reported so far, and we suggested that the detection of a broadened diagnostic panel of genes in patients with apparently idiopathic NOA or severe oligozoospermia may increase the probability of reaching a diagnosis.[14] Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of monogenic causes of SPGF through an investigation of a panel of 15 genes [Table 1] thought to regulate sperm production by next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis in patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia or NOA. | Table 1: Genes whose mutations cause spermatogenic failure characterized by decreased sperm number
Click here to view |
| Patients and Methods | | |
Patients
This was a cross-sectional study performed on patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia or NOA referred to the Division of Andrology and Endocrinology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. Each patient underwent a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, which included serum hormone measurement, ultrasound (US) testicular evaluation, prostate-vesicular transrectal US, sperm, and urethral swab culture if male accessory gland infection was suspected, echo-color Doppler for varicocele detection, karyotype, Yq AZF microdeletions, and CFTR gene analysis (if needed). Sperm analysis was repeated at least twice in our Laboratory of Seminology, Division of Andrology and Endocrinology, University of Catania. Patients whose oligozoospermia or NOA was diagnosed at the end of the aforementioned diagnostic process were excluded. Instead, those whose cause of SPGF was not found were enrolled in the present study and underwent blood sampling for NGS analysis and candidate gene sequencing [Table 1].
Ethical approval
Informed written consent was obtained from each participant after full explanation of the purpose and nature of all procedures used. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Internal Review Board of the Division of Andrology and Endocrinology, University of Catania.
Sperm analysis
Semen samples were collected by masturbation into a sterile container after 2–7 days of sexual abstinence and were analyzed immediately after liquefaction. According to the 2010 WHO guidelines, each sample was evaluated for seminal volume, pH, sperm count, progressive motility, morphology, and round cell concentration.[1]
Bioinformatic and genetic analysis
Genetic analysis was performed using an NGS approach and a custom-made gene panel designed to include the main genes involved in SPGF [Table 1]. A MiSeq personal sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for NGS. Sanger sequencing was performed for this gene panel when the target region coverage was less than 10 reads and for the family segregation study. All laboratory methods have been described elsewhere.[21] Briefly, 50 ng of genomic DNA was fragmented by enzymatic methods (Nextera Transposome System, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the target regions were enriched by Illumina Nextera Rapid Capture Enrichment (Thermo Scientific). Sequencing was performed by Illumina MiSeq using a paired-end protocol and 150 bp long reads. Nucleotide alterations were analyzed and validated by PCR. Fastq (forward-reverse) files were obtained after sequencing. Read alignment was performed using BWA (0.7.17-r1188) software (GitHub, San Francisco, CA, USA). Duplicates were removed using the SAMBAMBA (0.6.7) program (GitHub), and GATK (4.0.0.0; GitHub) was used for realignment. We searched the international databases dbSNP (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/) and Human Gene Mutation Database professional (HGMD; http://www.biobase-international.com/product/hgmd) for all nucleotide changes. In silico evaluation of the pathogenicity of nucleotide changes in exons was performed using the Variant Effect Predictor tool (http://www.ensembl.org/Tools/VEP) and MutationTaster (http://www. mutationtaster.org). Minor allele frequencies (MAFs) were checked in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). All variants were evaluated according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines.[22] Nucleotide variants next to the 3’ UTR are indicated with “*”.
| Results | | |
Overall, 25 unrelated patients satisfied the inclusion criteria and showed idiopathic oligozoospermia (n = 18) or NOA (n = 7). At enrollment, their clinical features, including age, hormone serum levels, and testicular volume, are reported in [Table 2]. | Table 2: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients enrolled in this study
Click here to view |
We found a total of 16 different rare nucleotide alterations, 12 of which have never been associated with a pathological phenotype. Rare variants with a known pathogenic effect in the NR5A1 (c.1063G>A p. Val355Met and c.1052C>T p. Ala351Val) and TEX11 (c.2288T>C p. Val763Ala) genes were identified in 3/25 (12.0%) patients with oligozoospermia. Rare variants with uncertain pathogenic roles in the ubiquitin-specific protease 9, Y chromosome (USP9Y; c.3178G>A p. Ala1060Thr), kelch-like 10 (KLHL10; c.* 5C>G), zinc finger mynd-containing protein 15 (ZMYND15; c.2015G>A p. Arg672His), polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4; c.17G>A p. Gly6Glu and c.1556G>C p. Trp519Ser), testis-expressed 15 (TEX15; c.7118G>A p. Ser2373Asn), spermatogenesis- and oogenesis-specific basic Helix-Loop-Helix protein 1 (SOHLH1; c.916C>A p. Leu306Met and c.868G>C p. Glu290Gln), TEX11 (c.776C>T p. Thr259Ile), and meiosis-specific protein with OB domains (MEIOB; c.318C>A p. Ser106Arg, c.634G>A p. Asp212Asn, c.643T>G p. Ser215Ala and c.* 4G>A) genes were found in 11/25 (44.0%) patients (8 with oligozoospermia and 3 with NOA). In 11/25 (44.0%) patients (7 with oligozoospermia and 4 with NOA), no variants were found in the screened genes [Table 3] and [Table 4]. | Table 3: Variants found in the patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia enrolled in this study
Click here to view |
 | Table 4: Variants found in the patients with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia enrolled in this study
Click here to view |
Among variants with an uncertain pathogenic role, 2 rare nucleotide alterations of the MEIOB gene were found in 4 patients (2 had oligozoospermia and 2 had NOA). The c.* 4G>A variant was found in 2 patients with NOA, and the c.634G>A p. Asp212Asn variant was found in one patient with oligozoospermia and one with NOA. In particular, a patient with NOA, increased gonadotropin levels, and low testicular volume had both the c.634G>A p. Asp212Asn and the c.* 4G>A variants [Table 4]. The USP9Y c.3178G>A p. Ala1060Thr variation was observed in 2 patients with oligozoospermia. Similarly, the same KLHL10 rare variation (c.* 5C>G) was identified in one patient with oligozoospermia and one with NOA. Rare nucleotide variations in SOHLH1 were identified in two different patients. The remaining variants were found in one patient each.
| Discussion | | |
Disorders of spermatogenesis are widespread throughout the world. In particular, the prevalence of oligozoospermia has increased in the last four decades, as meta-regression data suggest.[2] Worryingly, despite a comprehensive diagnostic workup, only a minority of patients receive a definite diagnosis, indicating the need to revise and implement the diagnostic tools currently adopted in clinical practice.
A genetic cause of oligozoospermia or NOA is thought to occur in the most severe cases. Although an increasing number of gene mutations have been reported in patients with apparently idiopathic oligozoospermia or NOA,[14] only screening for chromosomal abnormalities, Yq microdeletions, or CFTR mutations is routinely performed. Currently, NGS technology can be successfully used to perform molecular screening of a wide custom-made gene panel in a large cohort of patients with reasonable effort in terms of cost, workload, and time.[23]
In the present study, we analyzed a panel of 15 genes known to be involved in spermatogonia proliferation, spermatocyte meiotic divisions, and spermatid maturation whose loss-of-function mutations have been reported to play a role in SPGF [Table 1]. We studied 25 patients, 18 with idiopathic oligozoospermia and 7 with idiopathic NOA, carefully selected after a complete diagnostic workup. Overall, we found 17 rare genetic variants, 13 of which have never been reported before.
We identified three variants with a clearly known pathogenic effect in three patients (12.0%). Indeed, these variants have already been reported, and their causal role has been proven by functional studies. NR5A1 is a gene with an autosomal dominant inheritance, encoding a nuclear receptor transcription factor involved in adrenal and gonadal development, steroidogenesis, and reproduction. Mutations in this gene have been described in patients with oligozoospermia or NOA.[24],[25] The NR5A1 Val355Met mutation has been reported to interfere with protein function.[26] Indeed, Val355 is a conserved amino acid residue belonging to a functional domain of the protein. The Val355Met variant halves the protein activity in several different assay systems, resulting in a heterozygous partial NR5A1 loss of function.[26] Similarly, Ala351 is a conserved amino acid residue of a functional domain of the NR5A1 protein. Ala351Val has already been reported in a case of a disorder of sexual development.[27] Furthermore, a variant of the same codon Ala351Glu has been reported in XY sex reversal.[28]
TEX11, mapping to the Xq13.1 chromosome, is a meiosis-specific factor that plays a role in double-strand DNA breaks (DSB) repair.[29] Mutations in this gene have already been reported in patients with spermatogenic arrest at the meiotic phase.[16] The Val673Ala variant has been reported in NOA patients, and functional studies have shown its pathogenic role.[30]
Among the newly reported variants, 11 may be disease causing. A genetic variant was considered to be likely disease causing if it had a very low frequency in the general population (gnomAD minor allele frequency, detailed in [Table 3] and [Table 4], it modified a conserved amino acid residue, and was predicted to significantly affect the protein structure or function by in silico evaluation. Functional or segregation studies are warranted to confirm their pathogenic role. By contrast, pathogenic variants were defined in the case of existing functional studies documenting their disease-causing role.
USP9Y, mapping to the Yq11.221 chromosome, encodes ubiquitin-specific proteinase 9 and maps inside the so-called AZFa region. Mutations and deletions in this gene have been reported in NOA patients,[31],[32] representing the Y-linked SPGF phenotype (OMIM 415000). However, a 513 594 bp deletion in the AZFa region encompassing the USP9Y gene has been described in a normozoospermic man and his brother and father.[33] Thus, the role of this gene in SPGF has yet to be clarified. Interestingly, we found the Ala1060Thr variation, which has never been reported, in two patients with oligozoospermia. Ala1060 is a conserved amino acid residue whose variation may potentially impact protein function. However, functional or segregation studies are needed to clarify its role.
KLHL10, with an autosomal dominant inheritance, is the hallmark of SPGF10 (OMIM 608778). It encodes an evolutionarily conserved protein specifically expressed in spermatids. The c.674A>C p. Gln21Pro and the c.937G>A p. Ala313Thr variants affecting protein homodimerization have been reported in patients with oligozoospermia.[34] We also found a novel variant in the 3’ UTR region, the c.* 5C>G variant, in one patient with oligozoospermia and one with NOA. The functional role of this rare nucleotide alteration should be investigated.
MEIOB encodes an evolutionarily conserved protein in vertebrates with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding sites. It has been implicated in the pathogenesis of SPGF only recently. The mouse orthologue protein is indispensable for crossing-over, and meiob-deficient mice show SPGF due to meiotic arrest.[35],[36] Accordingly, few MEIOB homozygous mutations have been reported in patients with NOA due to spermatocyte meiotic arrest.[37],[38] Overall, we identified four novel variants (c.318C>A p. Ser106Arg, c.634G>A p. Asp212Asn, c.643T>G p. Ser215Ala and c.* 4G>A), two of them (c.634G>A p. Asp212Asn and c.* 4G>A) occurring twice in our cohort. In particular, c.634G>A p. Asp212Asn is a missense variant affecting a conserved amino acid residue without altering its chemical properties. c.* 4G>A maps to the 3'UTR region of the gene. Notably, these variants have both been found in a patient with NOA, increased gonadotropin levels and low testicular volume, all signs of impaired testicular function.
PLK4 is involved in germ-cell maintenance. In humans, heterozygous variations have been reported in NOA patients.[15] We reported two novel variants (c.17G>A p. Gly6Glu and c.1556G>C p. Trp519Ser) in a patient with oligozoospermia, both affecting conserved amino acid residues and changing the amino acid nature. The etiological role of these variants in the onset of oligozoospermia needs further investigation.
TEX15 is involved in DNA DSB repair occurring in spermatocyte meiotic divisions.[39] The homozygosity for a truncating mutation and the compound heterozygosity of a single-nucleotide deletion and a truncating mutation cause NOA[40] and maturation arrest at the primary spermatocyte stage.[41] A role of the newly identified heterozygous c.7118G>A p. Ser2373Asn TEX15 variant in the pathogenesis of oligozoospermia cannot be excluded and should be clarified.
SOHLH1 is known to be involvedin spermatogonia proliferation, encoding spermatogenesis- and oogenesis-specific basic helix-loop-helix protein 1.[42] Heterozygosity for a splice-site mutation has been observed in NOA patients.[43] We found two rare variants. The c.916C>A p. Leu306Met one has been reported in patients with oligozoospermia. It has previously been reported in primary ovarian insufficiency, but its etiological role has not been fully confirmed.[44],[45] The variation regards a conserved amino acid residue, and it does not drastically alter its function. The c.868G>C p. Glu290Gln nucleotide alteration was found in a patient with NOA. It has never been reported so far, and it involves a conserved amino acid residue, with no consequences on the amino acid nature. Its functional role should be investigated.
| Conclusion | | |
The results of this pilot study contribute to further expanding the current knowledge on nucleotide alterations of SPGF-related genes. As pathogenic variants, they were found in 12.0% of the enrolled patients; hence, this panel [Table 1] should be used to assess the prevalence of disease-causing genetic variants in a wider sample size prior to its introduction in the screening of these mutations in clinical practice. The investigation of this wide custom-made gene panel in patients with idiopathic oligozoospermia or NOA by NGS technology may reasonably increase the rate of diagnosis. Furthermore, likely pathogenic variants need to be assessed in fertile patients to ascertain their role in the etiology of the disease and to be further investigated by functional or segregation studies. Finally, the possible prognostic role in the evaluation of testicular sperm retrieval rate, pregnancy outcome, and health risk for the offspring needs to be addressed in the future.
| Author Contributions | | |
RC conceived the study, participated in data analysis, and wrote the original draft. RAC participated in data analysis and in project supervision. SP performed the genomic studies and participated in the writing of the original draft. FB participated in the writing of the original draft. GG participated in the genomic studies and performed the statistical analysis. MB participated in the draft of the manuscript and in project supervision. SLV participated in project supervision and in review and editing of the final version of the manuscript. AEC conceived the study, supervised the project, and edited the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree with the order of presentation of the authors.
| Competing Interests | | |
All authors declared no competing interests.
| References | | |
| 1. | World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5 th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.  |
| 2. | Levine H, Jørgensen N, Martino-Andrade A, Mendiola J, Weksler-Derri D, et al. Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23: 646–59. |
| 3. | Punab M, Poolamets O, Paju P, Vihljajev V, Pomm K, et al. Causes of male infertility: a 9-year prospective monocentre study on 1737 patients with reduced total sperm counts. Hum Reprod 2017; 32: 18–31. |
| 4. | Xie C, Chen X, Liu Y, Wu Z, Ping P. Multicenter study of genetic abnormalities associated with severe oligospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia. J Int Med Res 2018; 46: 107–14. |
| 5. | Tournaye H, Krausz C, Oates RD. Concepts in diagnosis and therapy for male reproductive impairment. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5: 554–64. |
| 6. | Tüttelmann F, Luetjens CM, Nieschlag E. Optimising workflow in andrology: a new electronic patient record and database. Asian J Androl 2006; 8: 235–41. |
| 7. | Tüttelmann F, Ruckert C, Röpke A. Disorders of spermatogenesis: perspectives for novel genetic diagnostics after 20 years of unchanged routine. Med Genet 2018; 30: 12–20. |
| 8. | Neto FT, Bach PV, Najari BB, Li PS, Goldstein M. Genetics of male infertility. Curr Urol Rep 2016; 17: 70. |
| 9. | Potter SJ, De Falco T. Role of the testis interstitial compartment in spermatogonial stem cell function. Reproduction 2017; 153: 151–62. |
| 10. | Schultz N, Hamra FK, Garbers DL. A multitude of genes expressed solely in meiotic or postmeiotic spermatogenic cells offers a myriad of contraceptive targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 12201–6. |
| 11. | Matzuk MM, Lamb DJ. The biology of infertility: research advances and clinical challenges. Nat Med 2008; 14: 1197–213. |
| 12. | Yan W. Male infertility caused by spermiogenic defects: lessons from gene knockouts. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2009; 306: 24–32. |
| 13. | Chalmel F, Lardenois A, Evrard B, Mathieu R, Feig C, et al. Global human tissue profiling and protein network analysis reveals distinct levels of transcriptional germline-specificity and identifies target genes for male infertility. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 3233–48. |
| 14. | Cannarella R, Condorelli RA, Duca Y, La Vignera S, Calogero AE. New insights into the genetics of spermatogenic failure: a review of the literature. Hum Genet 2019; 138: 125–40. |
| 15. | Miyamoto T, Bando Y, Koh E, Tsujimura A, Miyagawa Y, et al. A PLK4 mutation causing azoospermia in a man with Sertoli cell-only syndrome. Andrology 2016; 4: 75–81. |
| 16. | Yatsenko AN, Georgiadis AP, Röpke A, Berman AJ, Jaffe T, et al. X-linked TEX11 mutations, meiotic arrest, and azoospermia in infertile men. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2097–107. |
| 17. | Miyamoto T, Hasuike S, Yogev L, Maduro MR, Ishikawa M, et al. Azoospermia in patients heterozygous for a mutation in SYCP3. Lancet 2003; 362: 1714–9. |
| 18. | Bashamboo A, Ferraz-de-Souza B, Lourenco D, Lin L, Sebire NJ, et al. Human male infertility associated with mutations in NR5A1 encoding steroidogenic factor 1. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 87: 505–12. |
| 19. | Ferlin A, Rocca MS, Vinanzi C, Ghezzi M, Di Nisio A, et al. Mutational screening of NR5A1 gene encoding steroidogenic factor 1 in cryptorchidism and male factor infertility and functional analysis of seven undescribed mutations. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 163–9. |
| 20. | Choi Y, Jeon S, Choi M, Lee M, Park M, et al. Mutations in SOHLH1 gene associate with nonobstructive azoospermia. Hum Mutat 2010; 31: 788–93. |
| 21. | Mattassi R, Manara E, Colombo PG, Manara S, Porcella A, et al. Variant discovery in patients with Mendelian vascular anomalies by next-generation sequencing and their use in patient clinical management. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67: 922–32. |
| 22. | Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, et al. ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015; 17: 405–24. |
| 23. | Michelini S, Vettori A, Maltese PE, Cardone M, Bruson A, et al. Genetic screening in a large cohort of Italian patients affected by primary lymphedema using a next generation sequencing (NGS) approach. Lymphology 2016; 49: 57–72. |
| 24. | Röpke A, Tewes AC, Gromoll J, Kliesch S, Wieacker P, et al. Comprehensive sequence analysis of the NR5A1 gene encoding steroidogenic factor 1 in a large group of infertile males. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21: 1012–5. |
| 25. | Zare-Abdollahi D, Safari S, Mirfakhraie R, Movafagh A, Bastami M, et al. Mutational screening of the NR5A1 in azoospermia. Andrologia 2015; 47: 395–401. |
| 26. | Philibert P, Zenaty D, Lin L, Soskin S, Audran F, et al. Mutational analysis of steroidogenic factor 1 ( NR5a1) in 24 boys with bilateral anorchia: a French collaborative study. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 3255–61. |
| 27. | Philibert P, Paris F, Audran F, Kalfa N, Polak M, et al. Phenotypic variation of SF1 gene mutations. Adv Exp Med Biol 2011; 707: 67–72. |
| 28. | Rocca MS, Ortolano R, Menabò S, Baronio F, Cassio A, et al. Mutational and functional studies on NR5A1 gene in 46, XY disorders of sex development: identification of six novel loss of function mutations. Fertil Steril 2018; 109: 1105–13. |
| 29. | Adelman CA, Petrini JH. ZIP4H ( TEX11) deficiency in the mouse impairs meiotic double strand break repair and the regulation of crossing over. PLoS Genet 2008; 4: e1000042. |
| 30. | Yang F, Silber S, Leu NA, Oates RD, Marszalek JD, et al. TEX11 is mutated in infertile men with azoospermia and regulates genome-wide recombination rates in mouse. EMBO Mol Med 2015; 7: 1198–210. |
| 31. | Sun C, Skaletsky H, Birren B, Devon K, Tang Z, et al. An azoospermic man with a de novo point mutation in the Y-chromosomal gene USP9Y. Nat Genet 1999; 23: 429–32. |
| 32. | Foresta C, Ferlin A, Moro E. Deletion and expression analysis of AZFa genes on the human Y chromosome revealed a major role for DBY in male infertility. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9: 1161–9. |
| 33. | Luddi A, Margollicci M, Gambera L, Serafini F, Cioni M, et al. Spermatogenesis in a man with complete deletion of USP9Y. New Engl J Med 2009; 360: 881–5. |
| 34. | Yatsenko AN, Roy A, Chen R, Ma L, Murthy LJ, et al. Non-invasive genetic diagnosis of male infertility using spermatozoal RNA: KLHL10 mutations in oligozoospermic patients impair homodimerization. Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15: 3411–9. |
| 35. | Luo M, Yang F, Leu NA, Landaiche J, Handel MA, et al. MEIOB exhibits single-stranded DNA binding and exonuclease activities and is essential for meiotic recombination. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 2788. |
| 36. | Souquet B, Abby E, Hervé R, Finsterbusch F, Tourpin S, et al. MEIOB targets single-strand DNA and is necessary for meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet 2013; 9: e1003784. |
| 37. | Gershoni M, Hauser R, Barda S, Lehavi O, Arama E, et al. A new MEIOB mutation is a recurrent cause for azoospermia and testicular meiotic arrest. Hum Reprod 2019; 34: 666–71. |
| 38. | Gershoni M, Hauser R, Yogev L, Lehavi O, Azem F, et al. A familial study of azoospermic men identifies three novel causative mutations in three new human azoospermia genes. Genet Med 2017; 19: 998–1006. |
| 39. | Yang F, Eckardt S, Leu NA, McLaughlin KJ, Wang PJ. Mouse TEX15 is essential for DNA double-strand break repair and chromosomal synapsis during male meiosis. J Cell Biol 2008; 180: 673–9. |
| 40. | Okutman O, Muller J, Baert Y, Serdarogullari M, Gultomruk M, et al. Exome sequencing reveals a nonsense mutation in TEX15 causing spermatogenic failure in a Turkish family. Hum Mol Genet 2015; 24: 5581–8. |
| 41. | Colombo R, Pontoglio A, Bini M. Two novel TEX15 mutations in a family with nonobstructive azoospermia. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2017; 2: 283–6. |
| 42. | Suzuki H, Ahn HW, Chu T, Bowden W, Gassei K, et al. SOHLH1 and SOHLH2 coordinate spermatogonial differentiation. Dev Biol 2012; 361: 301–12. |
| 43. | Nakamura S, Miyado M, Saito K, Katsumi M, Nakamura A, et al. Next-generation sequencing for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: implications for significant roles of monogenic/oligogenic mutations. Andrology 2017; 5: 824–31. |
| 44. | Bouilly J, Beau I, Barraud S, Bernard V, Azibi K, et al. Identification of multiple gene mutations accounts for a new genetic architecture of primary ovarian insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101: 4541–50. |
| 45. | Zhao S, Li G, Dalgleish R, Vujovic S, Jiao X, et al. Transcription factor SOHLH1 potentially associated with primary ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 548–53. |
| 46. | Ayhan O, Balkan M, Guven A, Hazan R, Atar M, et al. Truncating mutations in TAF4B and ZMYND15 causing recessive azoospermia. J Med Genet 2014; 51: 239–44. |
| 47. | Kusz-Zamelczyk K, Sajek M, Spik A, Glazar R, Jedrzejczak P, et al. Mutations of NANOS1, a human homologue of the Drosophila morphogen, are associated with a lack of germ cells in testes or severe oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia. J Med Genet 2013; 50: 187–93. |
| 48. | Maor-Sagie E, Cinnamon Y, Yaacov B, Shaag A, Goldsmidt H, et al. Deleterious mutation in SYCE1 is associated with non-obstructive azoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32: 887–91. |
| 49. | Borgmann J, Tüttelmann F, Dworniczak B, Röpke A, Song HW, et al. The human RHOX gene cluster: target genes and functional analysis of gene variants in infertile men. Hum Mol Genet 2016; 25: 4898–910. |
| 50. | Wang X, Jin HR, Cui YQ, Chen J, Sha YW, et al. Case study of a patient with cryptozoospermia associated with a recessive TEX15 nonsense mutation. Asian J Androl 2018; 20: 101–2. |
| 51. | Mou L, Wang Y, Li H, Huang Y, Jiang T, et al. A dominant-negative mutation of HSF2 associated with idiopathic azoospermia. Hum Genet 2013; 132: 159–65. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Male Infertility Diagnosis: Improvement of Genetic Analysis Performance by the Introduction of Pre-Diagnostic Genes in a Next-Generation Sequencing Custom-Made Panel |
|
| Vincenza Precone,Rossella Cannarella,Stefano Paolacci,Gian Maria Busetto,Tommaso Beccari,Liborio Stuppia,Gerolamo Tonini,Alessandra Zulian,Giuseppe Marceddu,Aldo E. Calogero,Matteo Bertelli | | Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2021; 11 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Seminal Plasma Transcriptome and Proteome: Towards a Molecular Approach in the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Male Infertility |
|
| Rossella Cannarella,Federica Barbagallo,Andrea Crafa,Sandro La Vignera,Rosita A. Condorelli,Aldo E. Calogero | | International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(19): 7308 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Clinical Evaluation of a Custom Gene Panel as a Tool for Precision Male Infertility Diagnosis by Next-Generation Sequencing |
|
| Rossella Cannarella,Vincenza Precone,Giulia Guerri,Gian Maria Busetto,Gian Carlo Di Renzo,Sandro Gerli,Elena Manara,Astrit Dautaj,Matteo Bertelli,Aldo Eugenio Calogero | | Life. 2020; 10(10): 242 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
Search Pubmed for