|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 473-478
Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of androgen insensitivity syndrome patients
Shi-Min Yuan1, Ya-Nan Zhang2, Juan Du1,3, Wen Li1,3, Chao-Feng Tu3, Lan-Lan Meng1, Ge Lin1,3, Guang-Xiu Lu1,3, Yue-Qiu Tan1,3
1 Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of Citic-Xiangya, Changsha 410078, China
2 Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha 410078, China
3 Institute of Reproduction and Stem Cell Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China
|Date of Submission||29-Aug-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||25-Jan-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||18-May-2018|
Dr. Yue-Qiu Tan
Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of Citic-Xiangya, Changsha 410078, China; Institute of Reproduction and Stem Cell Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), an X-linked recessive genetic disorder of sex development, is caused by mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) gene, and is characterized by partial or complete inability of specific tissues to respond to androgens in individuals with the 46,XY karyotype. This study aimed to investigate AR gene mutations and to characterize genotype–phenotype correlations. Ten patients from unrelated families, aged 2–31 years, were recruited in the study. Based on karyotype, altered hormone profile, and clinical manifestations, nine patients were preliminarily diagnosed with complete AIS and one with partial AIS. Genetic analysis of AR gene revealed the existence of 10 different mutations, of which five were novel (c.2112 C>G[p.S704R], c.2290T>A[p.Y764N], c.2626C>T[p.Q876X], c.933dupC[p.K313Qfs*28], and c.1067delC[p.A356Efs*123]); the other five were previously reported (c.1789G>A[p.A597T], c.2566C>T[p.R856C], c.2668G>A[p.V890M], c.2679C>T[p.P893L], and c.1605C>G[p.Y535X]). Regarding the distribution of these mutations, 60.0% were clustered in the ligand-binding domain of AR gene. Exons 1 and 8 of AR gene each accounted for 30.0% (3/10) of all mutations. Most of the truncation mutations were in exon 1 and missense mutations were mainly located in exons 4–8. Our study expands the spectrum of AR gene mutations and confirms the usefulness of AR gene sequencing to support a diagnosis of AIS and to enable prenatal or antenatal screening.
Keywords: androgen insensitivity syndrome;androgen receptor; disorder of sex development; mutation
|How to cite this article:|
Yuan SM, Zhang YN, Du J, Li W, Tu CF, Meng LL, Lin G, Lu GX, Tan YQ. Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of androgen insensitivity syndrome patients. Asian J Androl 2018;20:473-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Yuan SM, Zhang YN, Du J, Li W, Tu CF, Meng LL, Lin G, Lu GX, Tan YQ. Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of androgen insensitivity syndrome patients. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Jul 26];20:473-8. Available from: https://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2018/20/5/473/232713 - DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_17_18
| Introduction|| |
Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS; OMIM# 300068) is a common 46, XY disorder of sex development (DSD) resulting from complete or partial resistance to the biological actions of androgens. Affected individuals typically exhibit inguinal swelling during infancy or primary amenorrhea during puberty. According to the degree of androgen responsiveness, AIS presents with a broad spectrum of defects in the external genitalia and can be subdivided into three phenotypes: complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) with typical female external genitalia, partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS) with predominantly male or ambiguous external genitalia, and mild androgen insensitivity syndrome (MAIS) with typical male external genitalia or an isolated micropenis, but with gynecomastia at puberty and infertility in adulthood. Of these categories, CAIS is the classic manifestation of AIS. The clinical diagnosis of CAIS is typically based on primary amenorrhea at puberty or inguinal hernia and labial swelling in a female infant with a 46, XY karyotype. A pathogenic mutation of the androgen receptor gene (AR; OMIM# 313700) is the only established molecular cause of the X-linked recessive inherited disease.
The AR gene is located on chromosome Xq11-12 and contains eight exons that encode a protein of 920 amino acid residues. This protein functions as a steroid hormone-activated transcription factor and contains four major functional domains: the N-terminal domain (NTD, transcriptional activation region encoded by exon 1), the DNA-binding domain (DBD, encoded by exon 2 and 3), and finally, the ligand-binding domain (LBD, encoded by exon 4–8), which is involved in binding to androgens and relevant co-activator proteins. Upon binding of the hormone ligand, the androgen receptor protein dissociates from accessory proteins, translocates into the nucleus, dimerizes, and subsequently stimulates the transcription of androgen-responsive genes., Thus, normal primary male sexual development before birth and the development of secondary sexual characteristics during puberty require the presence of a functional androgen receptor.
To date, more than 1000 different AIS-causing variantsin AR gene have been identified., Among these, missense mutations are the most common which primarily occur in the AR-DBD or AR-LBD, leading to impairment in DNA or androgen binding, respectively. Splicing, small insertions and deletions, and nonsense mutations have also been reported, which result in a premature stop codon.
In this study, we report the clinical characteristics and the molecular genetic analysis of AR gene in ten unrelated patients suffering from AIS. Sequence analysis of the AR gene identified the disease-associated mutations. Our study expands the spectrum of mutations associated with AIS and may contribute to treatment and reproductive counseling for these patients.
| Patients and Methods|| |
Ten unrelated patients from ten nonconsanguineous families attending the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of Citic-Xiangya (Changsha, China) during 2013–2016 were included in the study. Based on the karyotype, altered hormone profile, and clinical manifestations such as external genitalia, primary amenorrhea, inguinal hernia, and scant or absent pubic and/or axillary hair, nine patients were preliminarily diagnosed with CAIS. One case was suspected of having PAIS because of the ambiguous external genitalia. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of Citic-Xiangya, and written informed consent was obtained from all adult patients or the parents of pediatric patients.
Mutation analysis of the AR gene
Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients using the QIAamp DNA blood Midi kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). All the eight exons and the intron–exon boundaries of AR gene were amplified by PCR using specific primers designed with Primer 5 software [Table 1]. The 50-μl PCR reaction mixture included 25 μl of GoTaq Green Master Mix (2×, Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 22 μl of RNase-free water, 50 ng of DNA, and 10 μmol l−1 of each primer. Amplification reactions were performed in a thermocycler set at 95°C for 5 min (initial denaturation) followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 40 s, annealing at the appropriate temperatures for 40 s, and extension at 72°C for 40 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The amplified PCR products were analyzed using 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis to determine the band size. Subsequently, bi-directional sequencing of the amplified PCR products was performed using an ABI 3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Forster City, CA, USA).
|Table 1: Primers used for androgen receptor gene amplification and sequencing|
Click here to view
Nucleotide sequences were analyzed using the DNASTAR software package (Madison, WI, USA), and the results were compared with reference sequences GenBank NG_009014.2 (AR, g.DNA), GenBank NM_000044.2 (AR, c.DNA), and GenBank NP_000035.2 (AR, p.protein) through BLAST searches. The human gene mutation database, the NCBI dbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP), and the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.internationalgenome.org/1000-genomes-browsers/) were used to determine whether the detected mutations had been reported previously.
Prediction of AR mutation effects
The potential pathogenicity of the novel AR mutations was examined by in silico analysis using three different software packages: Polyphen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2) and SIFT (http://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg/) for missense mutations and Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/) for all mutations.
| Results|| |
The clinical features and hormone data of the ten patients are presented in [Table 2]. Among these patients, six (aged 16–31 years) visited their physician owing to primary amenorrhea, three (aged 2–18 years) for inguinal hernia, and the remaining one (aged 9 years) for severe hypospadias; all had a 46, XY karyotype. All patients presented with typical female external genitalia and were diagnosed with suspected CAIS, with the exception of Case 3 who presented severe hypospadias and a presumptive diagnosis of PAIS.
|Table 2: Clinical characteristics and hormone levels of the ten patients with androgen insensitivity syndrome|
Click here to view
For the postpubertal patients, other major clinical manifestations were as follows: well-developed breasts, scant or absent pubic and/or axillary hair, absent/rudimentary Müllerian structures (including uteri and ovaries), and inguinal/abdominal testes. All patients underwent hormone testing, except Case 3. The levels of most of the serum hormones, including follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and testosterone, were within or elevated above the normal male reference range, as shown in [Table 2]. Cases 5, 6, and 8 underwent gonadectomy, and histological analysis of the gonadal tissues of Case 8 showed prepubertal tubules and large areas of fibrosis within the gonads. No germ cells were observed in either gonad [Figure 1]. The data of Cases 5 and 6 were not available. Case 3 had been raised as a boy and was reported previously. He was preliminarily clinically diagnosed with PAIS because of ambiguous external genitalia, including perineal hypospadias, unilateral cryptorchidism, and phallocampsis. Cases 1, 5, 7, and 8 had one or more relatives with a similar phenotype, whereas the others were sporadic. Family pedigrees of Cases 1, 5, 7, and 8 based on Standardized Human Pedigree Nomenclature are shown in [Figure 2].
|Figure 1: Histological analysis of the gonadal tissues of Case 8, obtained by gonadectomy. Large areas of prepubertal tubules (arrow) surrounded by some fibrosis (arrowhead) are visualized, with no germ cells in the gonads. Scale bar = 25 μm.|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Partial pedigrees of the families 1, 5, 7, and 8. The proband is indicated by an arrow. Black symbols: affected individuals; open symbols: unaffected individuals; black spots: carriers; squares: males; circles: females.|
Click here to view
Molecular genetic analysis of the AR gene
Sequence analysis revealed that all ten patients harbored AR mutations. Ten different mutations, including six missense mutations, two nonsense mutations, one duplication, and one deletion, were found. The number of CAG and GGC repeat in exon 1 of AR gene ranged from 20 to 26 and 13 to 17, respectively [Table 3]. The two novel missense mutations were: c.2112C>G (p.S704R), identified in Case 1, and c.2290T>A (p.Y764N), detected in Case 2. The remaining four known missense mutations, c.1789G>A (p.A597T), c.2566C>T (p.R856C), c.2668G>A (p.V890M), and c.2679C>T (p.P893L), which led to the change of a single amino acid, were identified in Cases 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. A known nonsense mutation (c.1605C>G (p.Y535X)) in exon 1 was detected in Case 7. Case 8 had a novel C>T substitution at site c.2626 that changed the glutamine (CAG) at 876 to a stop codon (TAG) (p.Q876X). In the family of Case 8, the mother and a maternal aunt of the proband were heterozygous for this mutation. A maternal cousin and another maternal aunt who presented with similar clinical features also had the same mutation [Table 3]. Case 9 presented with a duplication mutation, c.933dupC, which changed lysine to glutamine at codon 313 and introduced a premature stop at codon 341 (c.933dupC (p.K313Qfs*28)). Case 10 harbored the single nucleotide deletion c.1067delC, leading to a frameshift and a truncated protein containing only 479 amino acids (c.1067delC (p.A356Efs*123)). The two frameshift mutations were in exon 1 and are reported for the first time in this study. Familial analysis showed that the affected relatives of Case 1, 5, 7, and 8 also harbored the same AR mutation of the proband. The detailed results for the patients and their available family members are shown in [Figure 2], [Figure 3] and [Table 3].
|Figure 3: Sanger sequence traces of the ten mutations are depicted. The position of the AR gene mutation is indicated by an arrow. AR: androgen receptor.|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Summary of androgen receptor gene mutations in the ten Chinese patients with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome|
Click here to view
Prediction of the effects of the novel mutations
All detected novel mutations were evaluated as “disease causing” by Mutation Taster. The amino acid changes c.2112C>G (p.S704R) and c.2290T>A (p.Y764N) were predicted as “probably damaging” with a score of 1.000 (sensitivity: 0.00 and specificity: 1.00) by PolyPhen-2 and “not tolerated” with scores of 0.01 and 0.02, respectively (<0.05 suggests potential pathogenicity), by Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) analysis.
| Discussion|| |
AIS is commonly found in individuals with 46, XY DSD, and CAIS is the classic manifestation of the disease. In this study, we investigated the genetic causes of ten patients with AIS and identified ten different mutations of AR gene, including six missense and four truncation mutations, which led to a premature stop codon and were predicted to result in the synthesis of truncated proteins. Sixty percentage of the identified mutations were detected in LBD, and exons 1 and 8 of the AR gene each accounted for 30.0% (3/10) of all mutations [Table 3]and [Figure 4]. Among these ten detected mutations, p.S704R, p.Y764N, p.Q876X, p.K313Qfs*28, and p.A356Efs*123 have not been described previously in the literature.
|Figure 4: Schematic diagram showing the AR gene and the localization of the ten mutations identified in the present study. The exons of the AR gene are indicated by numbered boxes. AR: androgen receptor.|
Click here to view
Exon 1 of the AR gene contains two polymorphic trinucleotide repeats CAG and GGC, which encode polyglutamine and polyglycine tracts, respectively. These polyamino acids play an important role in the N-terminal transactivation domain of the AR protein. In a healthy population, the number of CAG and GGC repeats varies from 8 to 33 and 10 to 27, respectively., Some studies have shown a relationship between the two polymorphic microsatellite regions of the receptor and its transactivational activity., In this study, the number of CAG repeats ranged from 20 to 26, whereas the number of GGC repeats ranged from 13 to 17; the most frequent number of repeats was 20 and 16, respectively [Table 3]. Therefore, it appears that there is no correlation between the function of these mutant proteins and the number of both repeats in these patients.
The p.S704R mutation, resulting from a C>G transition in exon 4 (c.2112 C>G), led to a change from serine (AGC) to arginine (AGG) at codon 704 and was predicted to be pathogenic by in silico mutation analysis software. Although this mutation has not been reported previously, similar missense mutations at the same codon have been described elsewhere. The mutations p.S704C (c.2110A>T) and p.S704I (c.2111G>T) have been identified in patients with CAIS., Moreover, another single nucleotide change, p.S704G (c.2110A>G), was found in a patient with PAIS with ambiguous external genitalia. Thus, the codon at residue 704 seems to be a critical position for AR protein functionality.
The other novel missense mutation identified in this study, c.2290T>A(p.Y764N), is located in exon 5 of AR gene and was detected in Case 2. Other mutations at codon 764 have also been found previously. Mutation p.Y764H caused by a T>C substitution at site c. 2290 was found to be causative of CAIS, while the recurrent mutation p.Y764C was first described in a PAIS family by McPhaul et al. and has since been frequently reported in Brazil, and the United Kingdom. The nonsense mutation p.Y764X was also detected in the same codon of a CAIS individual. These studies indicate that the codon at residue 764 might be a mutational hot spot. The hinge region and LBD of AR are essential for dimerization of the AR protein., Mutations in these regions could impair the function of the receptor by disrupting dimer formation and impairing AR-induced transactivation., Thus, the two novel missense mutations in the present study may interfere with receptor dimerization, resulting in CAIS.
The c.1789G>A(p.A597T) mutation in the AR gene was detected in Case 3, who was the only PAIS patient in the study and suffered from hypospadias, penis deformity, and cryptorchidism. Gast et al. previously demonstrated that this single amino acid exchange could result in PAIS as an effect of DNA binding of the androgen receptor. This appears to suggest that a small modification of the androgen receptor binding has a defined phenotype. However, phenotypes of PAIS are highly variable and clinically indistinguishable from other 46, XY DSD diseases, such as 5α-reductase type 2 deficiency caused by SRD5A2 mutations and 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 deficiency resulting from a HSD17B3 defect. In our study, mutations in SRD5A2 gene and HSD17B3 gene-coding regions of Case 3 were not detected (data not shown).
The other three previously described missense mutations were identified in AR-LBD, which is important for binding to androgen and relevant co-activator proteins. The p.R856C mutation was found in Case 4 and confirmed to affect the binding of the androgen receptor and ligand., In Case 5, the p.V890M mutation, which was described as p. V889M in an earlier study, occurred at a CpG hot spot and could lead to reduced androgen binding. Moreover, the mutant receptor has a higher ligand dissociation rate and is unstable. Another known mutation in Case 6, p.P893L, has repeatedly been reported as a cause of CAIS.30–32
Two nonsense mutations were also found in the present study: the previously reported mutation p.Y535X in Case 7 and the novel mutation p.Q876X in Case 8. These mutations led to a premature stop codon in exons 1 and 8, generating truncated proteins containing only 535 and 876 amino acids, respectively.In vitro functional assays in a previous study by McPhaul et al. revealed that the p.Y535X mutation decreased the androgen binding to approximately zero. In our study, p.Q876X was the only truncation mutation detected in the LBD of the AR protein, in which nonsense mutations are rare. Both the two nonsense mutations led to truncated AR proteins, which were expected to affect androgen binding and could explain the cause of AIS in these families.
Two novel frameshift mutations were detected in the study, including a duplication mutation and a deletion mutation. Duplication mutations of AR gene are rare in AIS patients, but Case 9 was shown to harbor a c.933dupC mutation. The deletion mutation, c.1067delC, was detected in Case 10. Both frameshift mutations were located in exon 1 and were predicted to cause truncated AR proteins that lacked their essential functional domains (DBD or LBD).
In the present study, most of the detected missense mutations were located in the LBD and led to CAIS. The possible reason may be that the major missense mutations occurring in NTD or DBD, which usually lead to MAIS or PAIS, had a mild effect on AR function so that these patients were easily missed or misdiagnosed with other 46, XY DSD diseases. In addition, missense mutations in the LBD mainly cause CAIS because of disruptions of the AR protein function such as interference with ligand binding, disruption in dimer formation, or impaired AR-induced transactivation. In the present study, however, most truncation mutations, including p.Y535X, p.K313Qfs *28, and p.A356Efs*123, were identified in the NTD. Compared with single amino acid changes, truncation mutations in the NTD, including nonsense and frameshift mutations, are considered to be more intolerable. This is because of the loss of many crucial functional domains and the disruption of AR gene expression through the introduction of nonsense codons, which induce nonsense-mediated mRNA decay., Although no functional studies have been performed for these truncation mutations, mutant proteins lacking several key regions could be pathogenic or degraded, or confer a loss of function.
| Conclusion|| |
Our molecular diagnosis identified ten different pathogenic AR gene mutations in ten patients with AIS. Our study expands the spectrum of AR gene mutations and could provide evidence for the genetic and reproductive counseling of families with AIS.
| Author Contributions|| |
SMY conducted the genetic studies, drafted the initial manuscript, and wrote the manuscript; YNZ participated in data collection and sequence alignment, performed the initial analyses, and approved the final manuscript as submitted; JD and WL conceived of the study; CFT and LLM participated in data collection; GL and GXL critically reviewed the manuscript; YQT conceived of the study, helped draft the initial manuscript, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
| Competing Interests|| |
All authors declare no competing interests.
| Acknowledgments|| |
The authors are grateful to the patients and their family members for participating in this study. This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771645 and 81471432 to YQT).
| References|| |
Hughes IA, Davies JD, Bunch TI, Pasterski V, Mastroyannopoulou K, et al.
Androgen insensitivity syndrome. Lancet
2012; 380: 1419–28.
Mongan NP, Tadokoro-Cuccaro R, Bunch T, Hughes IA. Androgen insensitivity syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab
2015; 29: 569–80.
Sack JS, Kish KF, Wang C, Attar RM, Kiefer SE, et al.
Crystallographic structures of the ligand-binding domains of the androgen receptor and its T877A mutant complexed with the natural agonist dihydrotestosterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2001; 98: 4904–9.
Matias PM, Donner P, Coelho R, Thomaz M, Peixoto C, et al.
Structural evidence for ligand specificity in the binding domain of the human androgen receptor. Implications for pathogenic gene mutations. J Biol Chem
2000; 275: 26164–71.
Gottlieb B, Beitel LK, Nadarajah A, Paliouras M, Trifiro M. The androgen receptor gene mutations database: 2012 update. Hum Mutat
2012; 33: 887–94.
Infante JB, Alvelos MI, Bastos M, Carrilho F, Lemos MC. Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome caused by a novel splice donor site mutation and activation of a cryptic splice donor site in the androgen receptor gene. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol
2016; 155: 63–6.
Yuan S, Meng L, Zhang Y, Tu C, Du J, et al.
Genotype-phenotype correlation and identification of two novel SRD5A2
mutations in 33 Chinese patients with hypospadias. Steroids
2017; 125: 61–6.
Bennett RL, French KS, Resta RG, Doyle DL. Standardized human pedigree nomenclature: update and assessment of the recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns
2008; 17: 424–33.
Simanainen U, Brogley M, Gao YR, Jimenez M, Harwood DT, et al.
Length of the human androgen receptor glutamine tract determines androgen sensitivity in vivo
. Mol Cell Endocrinol
2011; 342: 81–6.
Delli Muti N, Agarwal A, Buldreghini E, Gioia A, Lenzi A, et al.
Have androgen receptor gene CAG and GGC repeat polymorphisms an effect on sperm motility in infertile men? Andrologia
2014; 46: 564–9.
Knoke I, Allera A, Wieacker P. Significance of the CAG repeat length in the androgen receptor gene (AR) for the transactivation function of an M780I mutant AR. Hum Genet
1999; 104: 257–61.
Audi L, Fernandez-Cancio M, Carrascosa A, Andaluz P, Toran N, et al.
Novel (60%) and recurrent (40%) androgen receptor gene mutations in a series of 59 patients with a 46, XY disorder of sex development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2010; 95: 1876–88.
Chin VL, Sheffer-Babila S, Lee TA, Tanaka K, Zhou P. A case of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome with a novel androgen receptor mutation. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab
2012; 25: 1145–51.
Radmayr C, Culig Z, Glatzl J, Neuschmid-Kaspar F, Bartsch G, et al.
Androgen receptor point mutations as the underlying molecular defect in 2 patients with androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Urol
1997; 158: 1553–6.
Quigley CA, De Bellis A, Marschke KB, el-Awady MK, Wilson EM, et al.
Androgen receptor defects: historical, clinical, and molecular perspectives. Endocr Rev
1995; 16: 271–321.
McPhaul MJ, Marcelli M, Tilley WD, Griffin JE, Isidro-Gutierrez RF, et al.
Molecular basis of androgen resistance in a family with a qualitative abnormality of the androgen receptor and responsive to high-dose androgen therapy. J Clin Invest
1991; 87: 1413–21.
Melo KF, Mendonca BB, Billerbeck AE, Costa EM, Inacio M, et al.
Clinical, hormonal, behavioral, and genetic characteristics of androgen insensitivity syndrome in a Brazilian cohort: five novel mutations in the androgen receptor gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2003; 88: 3241–50.
Murono K, Mendonca BB, Arnhold IJ, Rigon AC, Migeon CJ, et al.
Human androgen insensitivity due to point mutations encoding amino acid substitutions in the androgen receptor steroid-binding domain. Hum Mutat
1995; 6: 152–62.
Ahmed SF, Cheng A, Dovey L, Hawkins JR, Martin H, et al.
Phenotypic features, androgen receptor binding, and mutational analysis in 278 clinical cases reported as androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2000; 85: 658–65.
Cheikhelard A, Morel Y, Thibaud E, Lortat-Jacob S, Jaubert F, et al.
Long-term followup and comparison between genotype and phenotype in 29 cases of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Urol
2008; 180: 1496–501.
Centenera MM, Harris JM, Tilley WD, Butler LM. The contribution of different androgen receptor domains to receptor dimerization and signaling. Mol Endocrinol
2008; 22: 2373–82.
Haelens A, Verrijdt G, Callewaert L, Christiaens V, Schauwaers K, et al.
DNA recognition by the androgen receptor: evidence for an alternative DNA-dependent dimerization, and an active role of sequences flanking the response element on transactivation. Biochem
2003; 369: 141–51.
Nadal M, Prekovic S, Gallastegui N, Helsen C, Abella M, et al.
Structure of the homodimeric androgen receptor ligand-binding domain. Nat Commun
2017; 8: 14388.
Turek-Plewa J, Eckersdorf-Mastalerz A, Kaluzewski B, Helszer Z, Trzeciak WH. A mutation c.C2812T in the androgen receptor gene resulting in Pro817Leu substitution may affect dimerization of the androgen receptor and result in androgen insensitivity syndrome. Fertil Steril
2006; 85: 1822.e1–4.
Gast A, Neuschmid-Kaspar F, Klocker H, Cato AC. A single amino acid exchange abolishes dimerization of the androgen receptor and causes Reifenstein syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol
1995; 111: 93–8.
De Bellis A, Quigley CA, Cariello NF, el-Awady MK, Sar M, et al.
Single base mutations in the human androgen receptor gene causing complete androgen insensitivity: rapid detection by a modified denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis technique. Mol Endocrinol
1992; 6: 1909–20.
McPhaul MJ, Marcelli M, Zoppi S, Wilson CM, Griffin JE, et al.
Mutations in the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor gene cluster in two regions of the gene. J Clin Invest
1992; 90: 2097–101.
MacLean HE, Ball EM, Rekaris G, Warne GL, Zajac JD. Novel androgen receptor gene mutations in Australian patients with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Hum Mutat
2004; 23: 287.
De Bellis A, Quigley CA, Marschke KB, el-Awady MK, Lane MV, et al.
Characterization of mutant androgen receptors causing partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1994; 78: 513–22.
Kanayama H, Naroda T, Inoue Y, Kurokawa Y, Kagawa S. A case of complete testicular feminization: laparoscopic orchiectomy and analysis of androgen receptor gene mutation. Int J Urol
1999; 6: 327–30.
Ledig S, Jakubiczka S, Neulen J, Aulepp U, Burck-Lehmann U, et al.
Novel and recurrent mutations in patients with androgen insensitivity syndromes. Horm Res
2005; 63: 263–9.
Hughes IA, Werner R, Bunch T, Hiort O. Androgen insensitivity syndrome. Semin Reprod Med
2012; 30: 432–42.
McPhaul MJ, Marcelli M, Tilley WD, Griffin JE, Wilson JD. Androgen resistance caused by mutations in the androgen receptor gene. FASEB J
1991; 5: 2910–5.
Nilsen TW, Graveley BR. Expansion of the eukaryotic proteome by alternative splicing. Nature
2010; 463: 457–63.
Rouan F, Pulkkinen L, Meneguzzi G, Laforgia S, Hyde P, et al.
Epidermolysis bullosa: novel and de novo
premature termination codon and deletion mutations in the plectin gene predict late-onset muscular dystrophy. J Invest Dermatol
2000; 114: 381–7.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Individualized Care for Patients with Intersex (Differences of Sex Development): Part 4/4.Considering the Ifs, Whens, and Whats Regarding Sexual-Reproductive System Surgery
| ||Kanthi Bangalore Krishna,Barry A. Kogan,Tom Mazur,Piet Hoebeke,Guy Bogaert,Peter A. Lee |
| ||Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2021; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||A hemizygous mutation in the androgen receptor gene causes different phenotypes of androgen insensitivity syndrome in two siblings by disrupting the nuclear translocation
| ||Chunjie Liu,Yongfen Lyu,Pin Li |
| ||Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Novel compound variants of the AR and MAP3K1 genes are related to the clinical heterogeneity of androgen insensitivity syndrome
| ||Yiping Cheng,Yan Sun,Yiming Ji,Dongqing Jiang,Guoxin Teng,Xiaoming Zhou,Xinli Zhou,Guimei Li,Chao Xu |
| ||Bioscience Reports. 2020; 40(5) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Novel Mutations Segregating with Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome and their Molecular Characteristics
| ||Pilar Malcher,Pilar Jedrzejczak,Pilar Stokowy,Pilar Monem,Pilar Nowicka-Bauer,Pilar Zimna,Pilar Czyzyk,Pilar Maciejewska-Jeske,Pilar Meczekalski,Pilar Bednarek-Rajewska,Pilar Wozniak,Pilar Rozwadowska,Pilar Kurpisz |
| ||International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(21): 5418 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|