|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 349-354
Rapid screening for Klinefelter syndrome with a simple high-resolution melting assay: a multicenter study
Dong-Mei Fu1, Yu-Lin Zhou1, Jing Zhao2, Ping Hu3, Zheng-Feng Xu3, Shi-Ming Lv4, Jun-Jie Hu4, Zhong-Min Xia1, Qi-Wei Guo1
1 United Diagnostic and Research Center for Clinical Genetics, School of Public Health of Xiamen University and Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xiamen 361003, China
2 Xiamen Kingnova Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361028, China
3 Center of Medical Genetics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
4 Clinical Analysis Center, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China
|Date of Submission||20-Sep-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||10-Jan-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||30-Mar-2018|
Dr. Qi-Wei Guo
United Diagnostic and Research Center for Clinical Genetics, School of Public Health of Xiamen University and Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xiamen 361003, China
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is the set of symptoms that result from the presence of an extra X chromosome in males. Postnatal population-based KS screening will enable timely diagnosis of this common chromosomal disease, providing the opportunity for early intervention and therapy at the time point when they are most effective and may prevent later symptoms or complications. Therefore, through this study, we introduced a simple high-resolution melting (HRM) assay for KS screening and evaluated its clinical sensitivity and specificity in three medical centers using 1373 clinical blood samples. The HRM assay utilized a single primer pair to simultaneously amplify specific regions in zinc finger protein, X-linked (ZFX) and zinc finger protein, Y-linked (ZFY). In cases of KS, the ratios of ZFX/ZFY are altered compared to those in normal males. As a result, the specific melting profiles differ and can be differentiated during data analysis. This HRM assay displayed high analytical specificity over a wide range of template DNA amounts (5 ng–50 ng) and reproducibility, high resolution for detecting KS mosaicism, and high clinical sensitivity (100%) and specificity (98.1%). Moreover, the HRM assay was rapid (2 h per run), inexpensive (0.2 USD per sample), easy to perform and automatic, and compatible with both whole blood samples and dried blood spots. Therefore, this HRM assay is an ideal postnatal population-based KS screening tool that can be used for different age groups.
Keywords: high-resolution melting; Klinefelter syndrome; multicenter study; postnatal population-based screening
|How to cite this article:|
Fu DM, Zhou YL, Zhao J, Hu P, Xu ZF, Lv SM, Hu JJ, Xia ZM, Guo QW. Rapid screening for Klinefelter syndrome with a simple high-resolution melting assay: a multicenter study. Asian J Androl 2018;20:349-54
|How to cite this URL:|
Fu DM, Zhou YL, Zhao J, Hu P, Xu ZF, Lv SM, Hu JJ, Xia ZM, Guo QW. Rapid screening for Klinefelter syndrome with a simple high-resolution melting assay: a multicenter study. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Aug 2];20:349-54. Available from: https://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2018/20/4/349/228970 - DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_15_18
Dong-Mei Fu, Yu-Lin Zhou
These authors contributed equally to this work.
| Introduction|| |
Klinefelter syndrome (KS), the set of symptoms that results from an extra X chromosome in males, is one of the most common chromosomal disorders, with a prevalence of 0.1%–0.2% of all live male births, 3%–4% of infertile males, and 10%–12% of azoospermic patients. The typical karyotype of KS patients is 47, XXY, which constitutes approximately 90% of cases. Other chromosomal abnormalities found in patients with KS include higher-grade aneuploidies, such as 48, XXXY, and mosaicisms, such as 47, XXY/46, XY, which constitute the remaining approximately 10% of cases.
The complete spectrum of KS phenotypes is unclear. The classic phenotypes of KS include tall stature, small testes, sparse facial and body hair, signs of androgen deficiency, and azoospermia. However, KS patients may also suffer from a number of illnesses, including osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, psychiatric illnesses, and even cancer.,, More recently, other phenotypes, including specific cognitive, behavioral, and psychosocial features, which may present in childhood, along with delayed development and/or language difficulties, were also shown to be related to KS, broadening our knowledge of this genetic syndrome.,, Notably, increasing evidence has shown that offering a wide range of treatments and interventions, such as testosterone replacement treatment, testicular sperm extraction, early speech and occupation therapy, educational assistance, and classroom interventions, at the appropriate age can improve the long-term quality in life of individuals with KS and alleviate later complications.,,,
Although the phenotypes observed in patients with KS are treatable, effective intervention and treatment rely on timely diagnosis. Unfortunately, most KS patients (an estimated 75%) do not receive an essential, timely diagnosis because it is frequently overlooked by health-care professionals and the public. Among the diagnosed cases, most are diagnosed in adulthood during infertility investigations.,, Because of this systemic lack of early diagnosis, most KS patients fail to receive the potential benefits of specific treatments and interventions and may suffer a wide spectrum of physiological and psychological difficulties. Thus, population-based KS screening is urgently needed for comprehensive diagnosis of KS., Such comprehensive diagnosis may also eliminate research bias and improve our understanding of KS.
Traditional diagnostic methods, including karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are accurate; however, they are also labor-intensive, expensive, and lacking inadequate capacity, which limits their utility for large-scale population-based KS screening. Noninvasive prenatal testing for various conditions has been widely integrated into prenatal care. However, the application of noninvasive prenatal KS screening remains controversial because of the mild phenotypic presentation of KS, unsatisfactory sensitivity and specificity of testing, maternal anxiety, and the complications of genetic counseling., Therefore, postnatal screening is preferred for comprehensive diagnosis of KS.
In this study, we introduced a simple high-resolution melting (HRM) assay for postnatal population-based KS screening and evaluated its clinical sensitivity and specificity in three medical centers, using 1373 clinical blood samples. We also investigated the compatibility of this assay with dried blood spot (DBS) samples.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Principle of KS screening by HRM
The principle behind KS screening by HRM is based on the results of a previous study and is illustrated in [Figure 1]. Briefly, zinc finger protein, X-linked (ZFX) and zinc finger protein, Y-linked (ZFY) are paralogous genes located on the X and Y chromosomes, respectively. The DNA sequences of these two genes are highly similar. We designed a primer pair based on the identical regions of these two genes to amplify ZFX and ZFY simultaneously [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. The two amplicons differ at some nucleotides; thus, they can form heterozygous dsDNA structures that have a specific melting profile during HRM. When the ratios of ZFX/ZFY differ (e.g., 47, XXY vs 46, XY), the specific melting profiles also differ [Figure 1]c. To delineate KS cases, the relative signal difference (RSD) values were plotted using a 46, XY reference sample as a baseline. Then, the cases with RSD values below an appropriate cut-off value were scored as KS cases [Figure 1]d.
|Figure 1: Principle of Klinefelter syndrome screening by high-resolution melting. (a) ZFX and ZFY amplicons. The red letters indicate the primer binding sites, and the bidirectional arrows indicate the nucleotides that differ between the two sequences. (b) PCR amplification. ZFX and ZFY are simultaneously amplified by a primer pair. (c) High-resolution melting. Different ZFX/ZFY ratios result in different melting profiles. (d) Difference plot. Difference curves were plotted from the melting curves and the RSD values below an appropriate cut-off value were scored as Klinefelter syndrome cases. RSD: relative signal difference; ZFX: zinc finger protein, X-linked; ZFY: zinc finger protein, Y-linked; PCR: polymerase chain reaction.|
Click here to view
Determining the optimal amount of DNA template for KS screening
We first determined the optimal amount of DNA template to achieve the highest analytical specificity. First, 46, XY and 47, XXY DNA samples (n = 12 each; the sample size was determined by statistical analysis) were collected from the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory of Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xiamen, China. Then, these two groups of DNA samples were analyzed using the HRM assay with 50, 25, 10, or 5 ng of DNA template. The amount of template at which the highest analytical specificity was achieved was used in subsequent analyses.
Cut-off value for KS screening
To determine the cut-off value for KS screening, we first evaluated the RSD range of normal samples. For the analysis, 96 normal 46, XY DNA samples were used in the HRM assay on 3 consecutive days, and the RSD range was determined. Next, mixed samples containing 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, or 50% 47, XXY DNA (n = 12 each) were prepared by diluting 47, XXY DNA samples with a 46, XY reference DNA sample to mimic 46, XY/47, XXY mosaicism. The mixed samples were then analyzed with the HRM assay, and the RSD range was determined.
A cut-off value was established and adjusted by analyzing the RSD ranges for the 46, XY samples and 46, XY/47, XXY mosaicisms. The DNA samples used in this study were collected from the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory of Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital.
To better evaluate the clinical sensitivity and specificity by detecting additional KS cases in the multicenter study, instead of population-based recruitment, we recruited patients with oligozoospermia (i.e., sperm concentration <15 × 10 ml−1) or azoospermia who received karyotyping and Y chromosomal microdeletion testing at Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xiamen; Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; and the Women's Hospital at the School of Medicine of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. We used the same DNA samples which were used for Y chromosomal microdeletion for our KS screening. At each center, DNA samples were numbered by a technologist who did not know the corresponding karyotype, and a second technologist who performed and analyzed the HRM assays knew only the sample number. Then, the results of the HRM screening and karyotyping were analyzed by a third technologist.
A total of 1373 samples from the three hospitals were screened with the HRM assay. We used −6.00 as a cut-off value in this study; if the RSD value of a sample was smaller than −6.00, the sample was classified as “high risk” for KS; other samples were categorized as “low risk” for KS.
HRM testing using DBS
To investigate the potential for using the HRM assay for newborn KS screening, we conducted preliminary tests to determine if DNA extracted from DBS samples could be used for the HRM assay. Sixty DBS samples from male births were collected from the Newborn Screening Center of Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital. For each sample, DNA was extracted from 5 punches (3 mm diameter) of DBS. First, we evaluated whether the concentration of DBS-DNA was sufficient for HRM testing. Second, we compared the RSD values of DBS-DNA to those of whole blood samples to evaluate the effect of sample source on the HRM assay.
46, XY reference DNA samples
A total of 100 normal 46, XY DNA samples were collected from the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory of Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital. These samples were diluted to 20 ng μl−1 and mixed in equal amounts to prepare a 46, XY reference DNA sample. The 46, XY reference DNA sample was used as a standard to determine RSD values and was diluted as needed.
DNA extraction and quantification
The DNA samples used in this study were extracted using the QIAamp DNA mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. DNA extracted from whole blood was eluted in 200 μl of Elution buffer (Qiagen), whereas DNA extracted from DBS was eluted in 80 μl of Elution buffer. The DNA concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA).
PCR amplification and the HRM assay were performed on a LightCycler 480 II Thermocycler (Roche Applied Science GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Each 25 μl reaction contained 10 mmol l−1 Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mmol l−1 KCl, 1 U TaqHS (Takara, Dalian, China), 2.5 mmol l−1 Mg2+, 2 μmol l−1 SYTO™ 9 Green Fluorescent Nucleic Acid Stain (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA), 0.2 mmol l−1 of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 0.2 μmol l−1 of each forward and reverse primer. The primers used were 5′-GAACACCTTGCCAAGAAGAA-3′ and 5′-CAGCTTGTGGCTCTCCA-3′. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 15 s. The HRM analysis began with a denaturation step at 95°C for 1 min and a renaturation step at 40°C for 1 min, followed by melting (70°C–85°C, with a 0.03°C s−1 ramp rate), and 20 fluorescence acquisitions per °C were collected.
HRM data were analyzed as fluorescence versus temperature graphs using Gene Scanning software, version 1.5.0 (Roche Applied Science GmbH). The melting curve analysis comprised four steps: (1) data normalization by selecting the linear regions of the melting curves before (70°C–79°C) and after (82°C–84°C) DNA dissociation; (2) data adjustment by shifting the temperature axes of the normalized melting curves; (3) plotting the RSD value versus temperature using the 46, XY reference sample as a baseline [Figure 1]d; and (4) collection of the RSD value at a given temperature (80°C).
A normality test was conducted to determine if a set of RSD values followed a normal distribution. When the RSD value data set was nonnormally distributed, a nonparametric method, Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance (ANOVA), was used to test whether samples originated from the same distribution. All statistical analyses were performed using OriginPro 8.0 software (OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA).
The samples used in this study were remainders from previous tests, and no additional sampling was performed. Except for the karyotypes, identifying information, including the names and ages of the patients, were withheld from the study group. Therefore, no written informed consent was required. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, and Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.
| Results|| |
The optimal amount of DNA template for KS screening
As shown in [Figure 2], the RSD values of the 46, XY and 47, XXY samples were segregated into distinct groups for all tested DNA template amounts. The RSD values in the same group were not normally distributed (normality test). For samples with identical karyotypes, there was no significant difference in the RSD values at the four tested DNA template amounts (P = 0.88 for 46, XY and 0.22 for 47, XXY, Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA). For samples with different karyotypes, significant differences were found for all DNA template amounts (P = 4.88 × 10−4, Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA; [Figure 2]a. Therefore, the analytical specificities of the HRM assays were similar when 5–50 ng of DNA template was used.
|Figure 2: Optimal amount of DNA template for the screening of Klinefelter syndrome. (a) Comparison of the analytical specificity of high-resolution melting assays performed with different amounts of template DNA. (b) Mean and median RSD values of 46,XY and 47,XXY samples with different amounts of template DNA. Statistical analysis: the line within the box denotes the median, the square within the box denotes the mean, the horizontal borders of each box denote the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers denote the 5th and 95th percentiles, and the stars denote the maximum and minimum. RSD: relative signal difference.|
Click here to view
The differences in the mean and median RSD values between the 46, XY and 47, XXY samples were also calculated for all tested DNA template amounts. We used 25 ng of DNA template in subsequent studies because this amount showed the largest differences in the mean and median [Figure 2]b.
Cut-off value for KS screening
The RSD values of 96 normal samples were not normally distributed (normality test). As shown in [Figure 3]a, the HRM results obtained on 3 consecutive days showed high reproducibility (P = 0.81, Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA). Evaluation of results collected over 3 days (288 total evaluated data points) showed that the RSD range was −3.43–6.29.
|Figure 3: Cut-off value for the screening of Klinefelter syndrome. (a) RSD range for 46,XY samples. (b) Resolution of the high-resolution melting assay for detecting 46,XY/47,XYY mosaicism. Statistical analysis: the line within the box denotes the median, the square within the box denotes the mean, the horizontal borders of each box denote the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers denote the 5th and 95th percentiles, and the stars denote the maximum and minimum. (c) Analytical sensitivity and specificity for 46,XY/47,XYY mosaicism detection with different cut-off values. RSD: relative signal difference.|
Click here to view
Analyzing the RSD range of mosaic samples showed that the HRM assay exhibited high resolution for KS screening [Figure 3]b. When the lower limit of the normal samples (−3.43) was used as a cut-off value, the analytical sensitivity was 100% for samples containing more than 30% 47, XXY DNA. The cut-off value can be adjusted according to the expected resolution, sensitivity, and specificity [Figure 3]c. Finally, we used −6.00 as a cut-off value for KS screening in the subsequent multicenter validation study. Theoretically, mosaicisms containing more than 50% 47, XXY cells are detectable at this level of resolution.
We analyzed 1373 blinded clinical samples obtained from three independent clinical laboratories. As shown in [Figure 4] and [Table 1], according to the screening, 106 and 1267 samples were classified as “high risk” and “low risk” for KS, respectively. Comparison to the validated karyotype results indicated that all KS cases were detected. Of the “high-risk” samples collected from Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital, two samples were not KS cases, but rather a 45, X/46, XY(39) mosaicism and a 46, XY(37)/46, XX mosaicism. One of the “low-risk” samples obtained from the same institute was not 46, XY, but rather a 45, X., ish der(13)t(Y;13)(q11.23;p11.2)(SRY+. DYZ3+). Therefore, the HRM assay showed 100% clinical sensitivity and 98.1% clinical specificity for KS screening in the multicenter validation study.
|Figure 4: Multicenter validation of the high-resolution melting assay for the screening of Klinefelter syndrome. Institute 1: Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Institute 2: Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, and Institute 3: Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. Statistical analysis: the line within the box denotes the median, the square within the box denotes the mean, the horizontal borders of each box denote the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers denote the 5th and 95th percentiles, and the stars denote the maximum and minimum. RSD: relative signal difference.|
Click here to view
|Table 1: Multicenter validation of the high-resolution melting assay for Klinefelter syndrome screening|
Click here to view
Testing of DNA from DBS
As shown in [Figure 5]a, the mean concentration of DNA obtained from DBS was 8.0 ng μl−1 (range: 3.7–14.0 ng μl−1). When evaluating the RSD values of the DBS samples aggregated as a group, we assumed their corresponding karyotypes were all 46, XY [Figure 5]b. The RSD values of the DBS samples were compared to those of the 288 results collected from 46, XY whole blood samples using the cut-off value. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in the RSD values obtained for 46, XY DNA samples extracted from DBS and whole blood (P = 0.74, Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance [ANOVA]).
|Figure 5: Testing of DNA from DBSs. (a) Concentrations of DNA extracted from DBSs. (b) Comparison of high-resolution melting results derived from whole blood and DBS samples. Statistical analysis: the line within the box denotes the median, the square within the box denotes the mean, the horizontal borders of each box denote the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers denote 5th and 95th percentiles, and the stars denote the maximum and minimum. ANOVA: analysis of variance; DBS: dried blood spot; RSD: relative signal difference.|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
An ideal population-based screening method for a genetic disease should be highly sensitive and specific, high capacity, rapid, inexpensive, and easy to perform and automatic. Based on these criteria, HRM is one of the best screening methods used for the screening of various point mutation-based monogenic disorders., In this study, we report, for the first time, the evaluation of a HRM assay for postnatal screening of the highly prevalent chromosomal disorder, KS.
Recently, several real-time PCR-based methods have been developed for KS screening. However, these methods have some limitations that must be overcome before being used in clinical practice. For example, Mehta et al. reported a methylation-specific PCR-based assay detecting the methylation status of the X chromosome inactive-specific transcript promoter. This method showed 100% diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in a validation study with a small sample size. However, the cost and workload were too high due to the need for bisulfate conversion of template DNA, and the total turnaround time was approximately 9 h. Moreover, the conversion efficiency must be monitored to avoid false-negative results. Campos-Acevedo et al. reported another method based on the quantification of short stature homeobox (SHOX), vesicle-associated membrane protein 7 (VAMP7), and sex-determining region Y (SRY). However, this assay requires four hydrolysis probes and three reactions per sample, which leads to high cost and low test capacity. Although 1000 DBS samples were examined using this method, the clinical sensitivity and specificity are unknown because no strict karyotype validation was reported. We also developed a hydrolysis probe-based melting method to simultaneously detect KS and Y chromosomal microdeletions. However, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of this method for KS were not satisfactory. Compared with these three real-time PCR-based methods, the present HRM assay, in which a simple pair of primers with fluorescent dye in a single tube could differentiate KS, dramatically minimizes the cost (approximately 0.2 USD per reaction) and allows for relatively easy scalability (testing at least 96 samples per run). The overall turnaround time from DNA extraction to result in export was 2 h. In addition, the simple nature of HRM allows for easy automation of the assay, which can provide sufficient capacity for large-scale testing, meeting the demands of postnatal population-based screening.
Amplification with a single primer pair in our HRM assay preserved the original ZFX/ZFY ratio with high fidelity, and the results demonstrated that this strategy was not only low cost and high capacity but also high reproducibility [Figure 3]a, resolution [Figure 3]b, and clinical sensitivity and specificity [Figure 4] and [Table 1]. Based on the cut-off value set in this study, 46, XY/47, XXY mosaicisms containing more than 50% 47, XXY cells are detectable, which means that the HRM assay identified cases with a ≥1.5-fold change in the ZFX/ZFY ratio. Thus, forms of KS with higher-grade aneuploidies (e.g., 48, XXXY and 49, XXXXY) with a higher ZFX/ZFY ratio should be readily detectable. In clinical practice, the cut-off value can be adjusted or optimized according to retrospective analysis and the expected resolution, sensitivity, and specificity.
However, it must be noted that chromosomal abnormalities other than KS in which the ZFX/ZFY ratio is altered may lead to false-positive results. As in our multicenter study, a 45, X/46, XY(39) mosaicism and 46, XY(37)/46, XX mosaicism were falsely designated as “high risk” for KS. The ZFX/ZFY ratio changes in these two samples were 1.67- and 1.86-fold, respectively. However, such cases may benefit from a false-positive result, as they would likely lead to early diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities since all positive screening results should be confirmed by a diagnostic method (e.g., karyotyping). In contrast, specific KS cases with no ZFX/ZFY ratio changes (e.g., 48, XXYY and 48, XXYY/46, XY mosaicism) cannot be identified by our HRM assay and will result in a false-negative result. However, such cases are rare. Similarly, as shown in our clinical study, a rare chromosomal structural abnormality with a ZFX/ZFY ratio of 1 also cannot be detected. However, this does not compromise the clinical sensitivity of KS screening.
Interestingly, we detected no other forms of KS except for 47, XXY in our clinical study. Therefore, we hypothesize that the prevalence of other forms of KS in southern China are not as high as those published for other areas. In fact, all 156 postnatal KS cases diagnosed by karyotyping at Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital in the past 3 years were 47, XXY (unpublished data). However, the prevalence of this chromosomal disease should be further examined after implementing this population-based screening.
DSB and whole blood are common clinical DNA resources that are used for genetic screening of different age groups. However, the amount of DNA that can be extracted from DBS is limited. Our HRM assay displayed high analytical specificity when as little as 5 ng of template DNA was used [Figure 2]. Interestingly, the amount of DNA extracted from all 60 DBS samples used in our study met the optimal DNA template amount (25 ng) for the HRM assay [Figure 5]. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the HRM results obtained with DNA extracted from DBS and whole blood. Therefore, our HRM assay can be used for screening of different age groups.
| Conclusions|| |
We developed a high-resolution melting assay and evaluated its clinical capability for KS screening. This is the first multicenter, blinded study for KS screening. The assay was shown to be highly sensitive (100%) and specific (98.1%), of high capacity, rapid, inexpensive, and easy to perform and automate, and it is compatible with both whole blood samples and dried blood spot. Therefore, the high-resolution melting assay is an ideal KS screening tool for different age groups.
| Author Contributions|| |
DMF and YLZ participated in study design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. JZ, PH, ZFX, SML, JJH, and ZMX participated in data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. QWG conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed with the order of presentation of the authors.
| Competing Interests|| |
The study was not influenced by any authority, institute, or company, and all authors declared no competing interests.
| Acknowledgments|| |
We thank Dr. Wei Zhang of University of Arkansas at Little Rock for kindly providing support with statistics. This work was supported by the Grants from National Science Foundation for Young Scholars of China (project No. 81201361), the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Fujian Province (project No. 2015D012), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (project No. 2014D003), the Key Project of Fujian Province Young and Middle-aged Key Personnel Training (project No. 2013-ZQN-ZD-36), and the Key Projects of Major Diseases in Xiamen (project No. 3502Z20149030).
| References|| |
Klinefelter HF Jr, Reifenstein EC Jr, Albright F. Syndrome characterized by gynecomastia aspermatogenesis without A-Leydigism and increased excretion of follicle stimulating hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1942; 2: 615–27.
Forti G, Corona G, Vignozzi L, Krausz C, Maggi M. Klinefelter's syndrome: a clinical and therapeutical update. Sex Dev
2010; 4: 249–58.
Bonomi M, Rochira V, Pasquali D, Balercia G, Jannini EA, et al
. Klinefelter syndrome (KS): genetics, clinical phenotype and hypogonadism. J Endocrinol Invest
2017; 40: 123–34.
Lanfranco F, Kamischke A, Zitzmann M, Nieschlag E. Klinefelter's syndrome. Lancet
2004; 364: 273–83.
Salzano A, Arcopinto M, Marra AM, Bobbio E, Esposito D, et al
. Klinefelter syndrome, cardiovascular system, and thromboembolic disease: review of literature and clinical perspectives. Eur J Endocrinol
2016; 175: R27–40.
Calogero AE, Giagulli VA, Mongioi LM, Triggiani V, Radicioni AF, et al
. Klinefelter syndrome: cardiovascular abnormalities and metabolic disorders. J Endocrinol Invest
2017; 40: 705–12.
Bojesen A, Gravholt CH. Klinefelter syndrome in clinical practice. Nat Clin Pract Urol
2007; 4: 192–204.
Samango-Sprouse C. Expansion of the phenotypic profile of the young child with XXY. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev
2010; 8 Suppl 1: 160–8.
van Rijn S, Swaab H, Aleman A, Kahn RS. Social behavior and autism traits in a sex chromosomal disorder: Klinefelter (47XXY) syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord
2008; 38: 1634–41.
Ross JL, Roeltgen DP, Stefanatos G, Benecke R, Zeger MP, et al
. Cognitive and motor development during childhood in boys with Klinefelter syndrome. Am J Med Genet A
2008; 146A: 708–19.
Gies I, Unuane D, Velkeniers B, De Schepper J. Management of Klinefelter syndrome during transition. Eur J Endocrinol
2014; 171: R67–77.
Graham JM Jr, Bashir AS, Stark RE, Silbert A, Walzer S. Oral and written language abilities of XXY boys: implications for anticipatory guidance. Pediatrics
1988; 81: 795–806.
Tournaye H, Krausz C, Oates RD. Concepts in diagnosis and therapy for male reproductive impairment. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
2017; 5: 554–64.
Skakkebaek A, Wallentin M, Gravholt CH. Neuropsychology and socioeconomic aspects of Klinefelter syndrome: new developments. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes
2015; 22: 209–16.
Herlihy AS, Halliday JL, Cock ML, McLachlan RI. The prevalence and diagnosis rates of Klinefelter syndrome: an Australian comparison. Med J Aust
2011; 194: 24–8.
Bojesen A, Juul S, Gravholt CH. Prenatal and postnatal prevalence of Klinefelter syndrome: a national registry study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2003; 88: 622–6.
Morris JK, Alberman E, Scott C, Jacobs P. Is the prevalence of Klinefelter syndrome increasing? Eur J Hum Genet
2008; 16: 163–70.
Herlihy AS, Gillam L, Halliday JL, McLachlan RI. Postnatal screening for Klinefelter syndrome: is there a rationale? Acta Paediatr
2011; 100: 923–33.
Herlihy AS, McLachlan RI. Screening for Klinefelter syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes
2015; 22: 224–9.
Trask BJ. Fluorescence in situ
hybridization: applications in cytogenetics and gene mapping. Trends Genet
1991; 7: 149–54.
Mansfield ES. Diagnosis of Down syndrome and other aneuploidies using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and small tandem repeat polymorphisms. Hum Mol Genet
1993; 2: 43–50.
Samango-Sprouse C, Keen C, Sadeghin T, Gropman A. The benefits and limitations of cell-free DNA screening for 47, XXY (Klinefelter syndrome). Prenat Diagn
2017; 37: 497–501.
Reiss RE, Discenza M, Foster J, Dobson L, Wilkins-Haug L. Sex chromosome aneuploidy detection by noninvasive prenatal testing: helpful or hazardous? Prenat Diagn
2017; 37: 515–20.
Guo Q, Xiao L, Zhou Y. Rapid diagnosis of aneuploidy by high-resolution melting analysis of segmental duplications. Clin Chem
2012; 58: 1019–25.
Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc
1952; 47: 583–621.
Wittwer CT, Reed GH, Gundry CN, Vandersteen JG, Pryor RJ. High-resolution genotyping by amplicon melting analysis using LCGreen. Clin Chem
2003; 49: 853–60.
Montgomery JL, Sanford LN, Wittwer CT. High-resolution DNA melting analysis in clinical research and diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn
2010; 10: 219–40.
Mehta A, Mielnik A, Schlegel PN, Paduch DA. Novel methylation specific real-time PCR test for the diagnosis of Klinefelter syndrome. Asian J Androl
2014; 16: 684–8.
Campos-Acevedo LD, Ibarra-Ramirez M, de Jesus Lugo-Trampe J, de Jesus Zamudio-Osuna M, Torres-Munoz I, et al
. Dosage of sex chromosomal genes in blood deposited on filter paper for neonatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidy. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers
2016; 20: 786–90.
Zhou Y, Ge Y, Xiao L, Guo Q. Rapid and simultaneous screening of 47, XXY and AZF microdeletions by quadruplex real-time polyerase chain reaction. Reprod Biol
2015; 15: 113–21.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
|This article has been cited by|
||Rapid screening of MMACHC
gene mutations by high-resolution melting curve analysis
| ||Chao Wang,Yang Liu,Fengying Cai,Xinjie Zhang,Xiaowei Xu,Yani Li,Qianqian Zou,Jie Zheng,Yuqin Zhang,Wei Guo,Chunquan Cai,Jianbo Shu |
| ||Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 2020; : e1221 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Clinical Utility of a High-Resolution Melting Test for Screening Numerical Chromosomal Abnormalities in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
| ||Yulin Zhou,Wenyan Xu,Yancheng Jiang,Zhongmin Xia,Haixia Zhang,Xiaolu Chen,Zengge Wang,Yunsheng Ge,Qiwei Guo |
| ||The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|