Table of Contents  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 311-312

Redo surgery for failed hypospadias treatment using a novel single-stage repair

Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China

Date of Submission09-Feb-2017
Date of Acceptance23-May-2017
Date of Web Publication04-Jul-2017

Correspondence Address:
Yi-Dong Liu
Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_22_17

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Wu M, Chen SZ, Ye WJ, Liu YD. Redo surgery for failed hypospadias treatment using a novel single-stage repair. Asian J Androl 2018;20:311-2

How to cite this URL:
Wu M, Chen SZ, Ye WJ, Liu YD. Redo surgery for failed hypospadias treatment using a novel single-stage repair. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Jul 28];20:311-2. Available from: - DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_22_17

Dear Editor,

Urethral reconstruction of severe hypospadias represents one of the oldest problems and most common surgical challenges for pediatric surgeons. We recently developed a novel single-stage repair for these reoperative procedures. The aim of this letter is to describe our surgical procedure and report the first six cases treated with this technique. A total of six patients with prior failed repairs were referred to our center for reoperative hypospadias repair and underwent the novel single-stage procedure. The patient characteristics are presented in [Table 1]. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Renji Hospital, which was affiliated to the Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Informed consent was obtained from patients or their parents.
Table 1: The clinical characteristics of all the patients

Click here to view

A stay suture was placed through the glans for traction and sectioning scarring near the urethral plate, and an artificial erection was induced to confirm a straight incision. Penile scarring was reduced by sectioning the urethral plate as necessary, and the urethral plate was then fixed tensionless to the proximal portion of the penile body. A defect between the distal glans and urethral plate on the ventral part of the penis remained. Due to previous repairs, the base near the urethra above the surface of the tunica albuginea was not well vascularized. Before rebuilding the urethral plate with a graft, the external spermatic fascia (ESF) was dissected from the inner layers up to the level of the external ring, thereby allowing the graft to reach the distal part of the glans. The graft was subsequently fixed to the base of the penis because the base exhibited a long pedicle and was well vascularized. The buccal mucosal graft was retrieved from the inferior lip and was transferred to the ESF to create the urethral foundation and rebuild the continuity of the urethral plate ([Figure 1]). A preputial island flap of local penile skin was created, transported to the ventral region, and anastomosed to the urethral plate made from the buccal mucosal graft. The remaining external spermatic fascia, pericordal adipose tissue, and pedicled ventral dartos flap were mobilized to cover the neourethra. A urethral silicone tube was maintained for 3 weeks, and no suprapubic cystostomy was left in place. Cystoscopy was performed approximately 4 weeks postoperatively.
Figure 1: (a) Sectioned urethral plate is fixed tensionless to the proximal portion of the penile body and there is a defect between the distal glans region and the sectioned urethral plate in the ventral part of the penis. (b) The external spermatic fascia (ESF) is dissected off and transported to the bed of corpora cavernosa. (c) The buccal mucosal graft is transferred to the surface of the ESF to rebuild the continuity of the urethral plate. (d) Onlay anastomosis of adjacent penile skin flap is following to recreate a neourethra.

Click here to view

The patients ranged in age from 3 to 22 years (median: 9.6 years, interquartile range: 8 years), and the follow-up time ranged from 6 to 26 months (median: 10 months, interquartile range: 12 months). In the six redo cases, the location of the meatus at the time of reoperative surgery was essentially unaltered in two cases due to severe chordee or rotation, whereas the remaining four cases required repair of long urethral defects secondary to total or partial urethral dehiscence. Complications of the procedure were identified in one patient who complained of obstructive voiding symptoms due to meatal stenosis and another patient who developed a urethrocutaneous fistula postoperatively (total complication rate: 33.3%). Meatal dilation was successful in the former case, and a simple urethrocutaneous fistula closure was performed in the reoperation case. Cystoscopy results of the six patients show that the grafts are in good survival and smooth.

The treatment of failed hypospadias repair remains one of the most challenging problems faced by urologists worldwide because the tissue of penis is often scarred and unsuited to further surgical procedures. Particularly in cases with poor-quality surrounding tissue in the reoperative field, the paucity of genital skin, significant scarring, and the lack of adequate facilities have led to the discouraging results reported by earlier researchers. Different surgical salvage approaches, including tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty, the Mathieu repair, onlay and tubularized island flaps, and free grafts, have been reported.[1],[2],[3],[4] If the urethral plate is present and sufficiently wide after prior failed hypospadias repair, urologists may opt for TIP urethroplasty. However, if the urethral plate is not suitable for TIP, especially if the urethral plate is absent or grossly scarred, thereby contributing to chordee and insufficient penile skin, a two-staged repair may be considered. Bracka[5] reported a low complication rate in his cohort of primary repairs who underwent two-staged repairs, and Nitkunan's data also support the idea that the complication rate for secondary cases is similar to primary repairs with a two-stage approach.[6] Even in patients with ten or more failed procedures ("hypospadias cripples"), Nitkunan et al.[6] consider the two-stage repair to be the first choice approach.

Another broad category is single-stage buccal graft repair, given that the debate over a single-stage or two-stage repair for redo hypospadias surgery is ongoing. Macedo et al.[7] introduced the concept of combining different and well-accepted principles of urethral repair in one operation for complex primary hypospadias cases, which consists of using a buccal mucosal graft to substitute for the urethral plate and enabling an onlay transverse flap anastomosis covered by a second flap of tunica vaginalis. Considering the adjacent keloid scarring and urethral plate to be unsuitable for usage, we sectioned the urethral plate and removed all scarred and fibrotic tissue to expose the bed on the tunica albuginea, which was not well vascularized after prior failed repairs. The microvascularity of the ESF was suitable, and the wide ESF flap with a long pedicle could be easily mobilized to the distal penis without any risk for injury to spermatic vessels.[8] We used the ESF to reinforce the vascularity of the tunica albuginea bed of corpora cavernosa before harvesting and quilting the buccal graft.

In summary, our novel combined technique is safe and effective. The approach uses a buccal mucosal graft placed over a pedicled external spermatic fascia flap with an overlaid adjacent penile skin flap, and this surgery appears to be a suitable technique for salvage urethroplasty in patients with prior failed hypospadias repairs.

  Author Contributions Top

MW carried out the studies, participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and participated in the draft of the manuscript. SZC and WJY participated in study design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. YDL conceived of the study and provided the academic guidance. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  Competing Interests Top

All authors declare no competing interests.

  References Top

Barbagli G, Perovic S, Djinovic R, Sansalone S, Lazzeri M. Retrospective descriptive analysis of 1176 patients with failed hypospadias repair. J Urol 2010; 183: 207-11.  Back to cited text no. 1
Snodgrass WT, Lorenzo A. Tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty for hypospadias reoperation. BJU Int 2002; 89: 98-100.  Back to cited text no. 2
Borer JG, Bauer SB, Peters CA, Diamond DA, Atala A, et al. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: Expanded use in primary and repeat surgery for hypospadias. J Urol 2001; 165: 581-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
Shanberg AM, Sanderson K, Duel B. Re-operative hypospadias repair using the Snodgrass incised plate urethroplasty. BJU Int 2001; 87: 544-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
Bracka A. The role of two-stage repair in modern hypospadiology. Indian J Urol 2008; 24: 210-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
Nitkunan T, Johal N, O′Malley K, Cuckow P. Secondary hypospadias repair in two stages. J Pediatr Urol 2006; 2: 559-63.  Back to cited text no. 6
Macedo A Jr, Liguori R, Ottoni SL, Garrone G, Damazio E, et al. Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique). J Pediatr Urol 2011; 7: 299-304.  Back to cited text no. 7
Yamataka A, Ando K, Lane GJ, Miyano T. Pedicled external spermatic fascia flap for urethroplasty in hypospadias and closure of urethrocutaneous fistula. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33: 1788-9.  Back to cited text no. 8


  [Figure 1]

  [Table 1]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Author Contributions
Competing Interests
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded330    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal