Asian Journal of Andrology

INVITED REVIEW
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 15--19

Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics


Jonathan J Lund 
 Prosthetic Urology Research and Development, Boston Scientific, Minnetonka, MN 55343, USA

Correspondence Address:
Jonathan J Lund
Prosthetic Urology Research and Development, Boston Scientific, Minnetonka, MN 55343
USA

For patients with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction, implantable penile prostheses continue to be a viable treatment. Medical device developers apply design controls during the development cycle to ensure that a product performs as intended in the final use environment. This process relies heavily on the principles of systems engineering and documents every facet of performance, unmet need, and risk. To better understand design philosophy, it is important to frame benchmarked performance outcomes in the context of the ideal state. Careful consideration of erectile anatomy and physiology, including flaccid state, transitional phases, and full tumescence, informs penile prosthesis design philosophy and provides the foundation for product advancement.


How to cite this article:
Lund JJ. Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics.Asian J Androl 2020;22:15-19


How to cite this URL:
Lund JJ. Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 31 ];22:15-19
Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/article.asp?issn=1008-682X;year=2020;volume=22;issue=1;spage=15;epage=19;aulast=Lund;type=0