ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of print publication  

Evaluation of gonadotropin-replacement therapy in male patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism


1 Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul 34096, Turkey
2 Department of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34104, Turkey
3 Department of Urology, Biruni University Hospital, Istanbul 34295, Turkey

Date of Submission04-Sep-2018
Date of Acceptance25-Dec-2018
Date of Web Publication03-May-2019

Correspondence Address:
Mazhar Ortac,
Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul 34096
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_6_19

PMID: 31062720

  Abstract 


Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) is a rare disease in which medical treatment has a high success rate to achieve fertility. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of hormone replacement therapy and determine predictive factors for successful spermatogenesis and spontaneous pregnancy in patients with idiopathic HH. A total of 112 patients with low testosterone (T), luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and normal prolactin levels were diagnosed with HH and administered LH and FSH analogs as hormone replacement therapy. During treatment, 96 (85.7%) patients had sperm present in ejaculate samples. Among these patients, 72 were married and wanted a child. Of these 72 patients, 48 (66.7%) of couples had pregnancies from natural conception. After initiation of treatment, the mean time for the appearance of sperm in semen was 9.48 months. There were no significant differences between baseline FSH, T, and LH levels; however, older age, larger testicular size, and low rate of undescended testes were favorable factors for successful spermatogenesis. Larger testicular size and older age were also the main predictive factors for natural conception. We found that patients with undescended testes had a younger age, smaller testes, and lower T levels compared with patients exhibiting descended testes. The rate of sperm found in the ejaculate was not significantly decreased in patients with undescended compared with descended testis (73.7% vs 87.6%, P = 0.261). The medical approach for males with HH and azoospermia provides a successful treatment modality in regard to successful spermatogenesis and achievement of pregnancy.

Keywords: gonadotropins; infertility; male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism; pregnancies; spermatogenesis


Article in PDF

How to cite this URL:
Ortac M, Hidir M, Salabas E, Boyuk A, Bese C, Pazir Y, Kadioglu A. Evaluation of gonadotropin-replacement therapy in male patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Asian J Androl [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2019 Jul 20]. Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/preprintarticle.asp?id=257693




  Introduction Top


The normal development of fertility needs pulsatile secretion of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), which stimulates the synthesis of gonadotropins (luteinizing hormone [LH] and follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH]) from the anterior pituitary. Gonadotrophins stimulate gonadal testosterone production and spermatogenesis. LH stimulates testicular Leydig cell proliferation and testosterone secretion, whereas FSH induces the development of spermatogenesis via the activation of sertoli cells.[1],[2] Both LH and FSH are the primary hormonal factors regulating testicular functions required for male fertility, via the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Failure of this axis, such as disrupted GnRH or gonadotrophin secretion, leads to clinical hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH).[3] HH may be either acquired or congenital and is a relatively rare cause (<1%) of male infertility. A congenital form of HH accompanied with anosmia is referred to as Kallmann syndrome.[4]

Regardless of etiology, HH is one of the few causes of male infertility treatable with hormone replacement. Several clinical studies demonstrated that subcutaneous gonadotropin injections or pulsatile GnRH therapy induced the development of secondary sexual characteristics and spermatogenesis, as well as testicular enlargement. Both gonadotropin therapy and GnRH induced the appearance of sperm in the ejaculate.[5],[6],[7],[8] Besides gonadotropin therapy, other studies showed that human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) treatment without FSH may stimulate spermatogenesis, particularly in patients with a large testicular volume (>4 ml) and no history of cryptorchidism.[9] Moreover, FSH treatment stimulated partial spermatogenesis in a hypogonadal mouse model.[10] In clinical practice, traditional treatment includes the administration of hCG (1000–1500 IU) and FSH (75–150 IU) 2 to 3 times per week.[7] There is no ideal pharmaceutical dosage for HH treatment in the current literature. Furthermore, the success rate of treatment and its influencing factors have not been fully established.[8],[9],[11],[12] Studies on this topic lack the necessary patient population size due to the low incidence of the disease and the heterogeneity of treatment options. A golden standard medical treatment for HH remains to be defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of subcutaneous gonadotropin injections and determine predictive factors for successful spermatogenesis and spontaneous pregnancy in 135 patients diagnosed with HH.


  Patients and Methods Top


A total of 135 azoospermic patients diagnosed with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) (2002–2012) were included in this retrospective study. The diagnosis of IHH included physical examination, low testosterone levels with low/inappropriately normal FSH/LH values, normal prolactin levels, and azoospermia. Anatomical hypophysis pathologies shown by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were an exclusion criterion. Patients did not undergo genetic testing for diagnosed Kallmann syndrome or normosmic IHH. Clinical findings including testicle volumes, history of undescended testis, and medical and family histories recorded on enrollment. Average values of both testicular volumes were recorded via a Prader orchidometer (ASSI, Westbury, NY, USA). Semen samples were obtained via masturbation with visual erotic stimulation at the hospital. All semen samples were analyzed in the andrology laboratory of Istanbul Medical Faculty according to the criterion of the World Health Organization (WHO) laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen 1999 (before 2010) and 2010 (after 2010).[13],[14]

Patients diagnosed with IHH were administered LH and FSH analogs as hormone replacement therapy. A total of 23 patients were excluded from the study due to insufficient medical data. All of the remaining patients were followed up with quarterly semen and hormonal analysis. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocols of Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey and informed consent was waived for this retrospective study.

Treatment protocol

Urine-derived gonadotrophin therapy, which had been in use until 2010, was changed to recombinant form. Intramuscular hCG treatment started with a dose of 1500 IU (twice per week) and adjusted according to testosterone levels and testicular development over 6 months. If the patient remained azoospermic at the end of 6 months, FSH treatment (75–150 IU, twice per week) was added to the regime. Target FSH levels of 4–6 IU were achieved by FSH dose adjustments. The follow-up protocol included the quarterly assessment of semen, and FSH and testosterone levels.

The recombinant forms of FSH and LH were Gonal F (Merck-Serono, Geneva, Switzerland) and Ovitrelle (Merck-Serono), respectively. The urine forms of FSH and LH were Menogon (Ferring, GmbH, Kiel, Germany) and Pregnyl (Organon, Oss, Netherlands), respectively.

Statistical analyses

The Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. We divided patients into two groups based on the presence of sperm. Thereafter, couples with sperm were divided into two groups according to their pregnancy status. Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages and compared using the Chi-square test. Continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviations and compared using the independent sample t-test. Dependent variables were examined by paired samples t-test. Correlation analyses were evaluated using the Pearson's correlation coefficient. For multivariate analysis, possible factors identified with univariate analyses were further examined by logistic regression analysis to determine independent predictors of patient outcome. Statistical significance was considered when the two-tailed value of P < 0.05.


  Results Top


A summary of baseline data is presented in [Table 1]. A total of 112 patients with IHH and azoospermia were investigated, and the average age at diagnosis was 27.9 (range: 15–51) years. The baseline LH, FSH, and testosterone levels were 0.53 ± 0.77 IU l −1, 0.63 ± 0.61 IU l −1, and 1.10 ± 1.90 ng dl −1, respectively. Approximately half of the patients had received various treatment options, such as gonadotropins or androgen replacement, before presenting at our clinic. Fifteen patients (13.4%) had a history of cryptorchidism. Mean baseline testicular size was 5.16 ± 2.43 ml, lower than the normal expected testicular size. Following the combined hormonal treatment regime, 85.7% (96/112) of patients had sperm detected in ejaculate samples.
Table 1: Baseline data of patients (n=112)

Click here to view


The mean time for the first appearance of sperm in treated patients was 9.48 ± 6.8 months. The mean FSH and testosterone levels at the time of first sperm detection were 3.29 ± 2.19 IU l −1 and 8.27 ± 3.57 ng dl −1, respectively.

The mean serum FSH, LH, and testosterone levels, age, testicular volume, and history of undescended testis were compared between the two groups differentiated by the absence or appearance of sperm in the ejaculate. According to logistic regression and t-test analysis, no statistically significant differences were detected between these two groups in terms of baseline FSH, testosterone, and LH (all P > 0.05). However, patients with successful spermatogenesis were older (28.63 vs 23.75 years, P = 0.001), had a larger testicular size (5.02 vs 5.15 ml, P = 0.019) and a lower rate of undescended testes (0.11 vs 0.45, P = 0.026) [Table 2] and [Table 3]. In patients with successful spermatogenesis, the mean testicular volume increased after gonadotropin treatment (5.3 ± 4.0 ml vs 11.6 ± 9.0 ml, P = 0.001), compared with patients lacking sperm.
Table 2: Predictive factors for spermatogenesis (t-test)

Click here to view
Table 3: Predictive factors for spermatogenesis (correlated regression analysis)

Click here to view


Among the patients with induced spermatogenesis, 70 patients wanted children and 48 of these patients impregnated their partners by natural conception and seven required assisted reproductive technology (ART). The mean sperm count was 10.19 × 106 ml −1 at the time of spontaneous pregnancy. The mean time needed for spontaneous pregnancy was 21 ± 9 months. According to logistic regression analysis, increased age and larger testicular size were the main predictors factors of spontaneous pregnancy [Table 4] and [Table 5]. The average age of patients with or without spontaneous pregnancy was 30.0 and 21.2 years, respectively (P = 0.001). The average testicular size of patients with or without spontaneous pregnancy was 5.31 ± 2.40 ml and 4.68 ± 1.96 ml (P = 0.0018), respectively. However, the mean serum FSH, LH, and testosterone levels, and a history of undescended testis were found to have no statistically significant differences between the two groups (all P > 0.05).
Table 4: Predictive factors for pregnancy (t-test)

Click here to view
Table 5: Predictive factors for pregnancy (correlated regression analysis)

Click here to view


Subgroup analyses were used to investigate whether undescended testes were a negative predictor factor for the outcome of therapy. We found that patients with undescended testes had a younger age, smaller testes, and lower testosterone level compared with patients with descended testes (all P < 0.05) [Table 6]. In addition, the rate of sperm found in the ejaculate was decreased in patients with undescended testis; however, the difference was not statistically significant (73.7% vs 87.6%, P = 0.261). Among the treated cryptorchid patients with induced spermatogenesis (n = 11), of 9 patients wanting children, only four impregnated their partners with natural conception. In safety evaluation, no patients developed severe effects during the treatment period.
Table 6: Comparable patients with descended and undescended testes

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The LH-FSH combination is an effective therapy for restoring spermatogenesis in male patients with gonadotrophin-deficiency.[2] In this retrospective study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of gonadotropin therapy for the restoration of spermatogenesis in 112 HH patients. In addition, the potential effect of baseline factors on treatment outcomes was also explored. Approximately 85.7% (96/112) of the patients had detectable sperm in ejaculates during treatment. Dwyer et al.[15] and the European Metrodin HP Study Group [16] reported that FSH/hCG treatment induced spermatogenesis in 84% and 89.3% of patients with HH, respectively. In a meta-analysis of 30 studies by Rastrelli et al.,[8] the overall success rate of gonadotropin therapy on gonadotrophin-deficient male patients was 75% (range: 69%–81%).

Treatment of HH may take a long time to induce successful spermatogenesis. Dwyer et al.[15] reported that the time to develop spermatogenesis ranges from 3 to 19 months and 9 to 12 months for mono and combined gonadotrophin treatments, respectively. Different time periods for stimulation of sperm production may reflect different population groups and treatment regimens.[15] In this study, the mean time to achieve spermatogenesis was 9.4 months, consistent with other studies reporting the median time of the first appearance of sperm appearance reported as 9–12 months.[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] Matsumoto et al.[19] found that the median time of first sperm appearance was 12.9 (range: 6.1–17.1) months. However, Liu et al.[21] reported a longer median time of 15 months to obtain sperm in the ejaculate.[16] They speculated that this difference may relate to longer treatment sessions with lower dose hCG treatment and longer follow-up time.

Several studies have focused on the predictive factors for successful spermatogenesis in patients with HH.[6],[9],[12],[22],[23] In the current study, larger basal testicular volume, older age, and a lower incidence rate of undescended testis were positive predictive factors for achieving sperm in the ejaculate. Testicular size increased significantly after gonadotrophin therapy in patients with induced spermatogenesis. These findings support previous studies in which basal testicular volume and the rate of undescended testis were reported as the main prognostic factors for the restoration of spermatogenesis.[2] The relationship between testicular development and sperm restoration is expected since it is known that normal testicular function is an essential part of a functional HPG axis in healthy adult men.[3] It was proposed that mean testicular volumes >4 ml defined an important threshold for the success of sperm restoration.[24] Spratt et al.[25] reported that patients with partial/normal nocturnal LH pulses had larger testicular volume (4 ml) compared with those without LH pulses. Furthermore, Burris et al.[12] found that testicular sizes <4 ml were associated with complete gonadotropin deficiency, whereas a size >4 ml suggested partial gonadotropin deficiency. Although 71% of HH patients with a testicular size of ≥4 ml responded to gonadotrophin treatment, this rate was only 36% in patients with a testicular size of <4 ml.[26]

In the current study, testicular size was measured via the Prader orchidometer. Despite this subjective method, the orchidometer is closely correlated with measurements by ultrasonography. However, it should be noted that the orchidometer was shown to overestimate testicular volume, particularly with small testes.[27] Cryptorchidism is a common anomaly of male genitalia, estimated to affect 2%–4% of full-term male infants, and is a significant prognostic factor for fertility in both the general population and HH patients. A history of undescended testes almost always negatively affects the restoration of sperm in patients with HH.[9],[15],[17] In this study, we found that HH patients with cryptorchidism had a lower probability of achieving spermatogenesis. Furthermore, patients with undescended testes had smaller testicular volumes compared with descended testes in HH patients, possibly explaining the poor induction of spermatogenesis in cryptorchid testes. Similarly, in a study of 223 HH patients by Liu et al.,[21] the sperm restoration rate was only 64%, and an association was found between basal testicular volume and the presence of undescended testicles with the restoration of sperm. Pitteloud et al.[22] reported a high incidence of cryptorchidism (40%) in patients with HH that was shown to be a negative predictive factor for both testicular growth and spermatogenesis.

Although age is not a factor for successful spermatogenesis in the current literature, older patients had better outcomes compared with younger patients in our study. Liu et al.[21] also reported that older age was associated with earlier spermatogenesis in patients with HH. The higher motivation to achieve fertility and thus better compliance with the treatment was suggested as a possible reason for this association.

Regardless of the treatment options, the total number of sperm in patients with IHH generally remains below the normal level. However, this finding does not prevent these patients from become fathers, as pregnancy rates of 50%–80% can be achieved with a sperm concentration of 5 × 106 ml −1.[28],[29] Our data showed that nearly 68% of patients who wanted children achieved spontaneous pregnancy with gonadotrophin therapy. Furthermore, testicular volume was the most important predictor for spontaneous pregnancy. According to the existing data, the main predictive factor for spontaneous pregnancy is testicular size.[30] Farhat et al.[31] and Buchter et al.[32] reported that 58% and 72% of patients, respectively, achieved spontaneous pregnancy with gonadotrophins or GnRH treatment. Both studies also reported that patients with larger testicular size had a better outcome regarding spontaneous pregnancy rates.

In the present work, the average sperm concentration was 10 × 106 ml −1 at the time of impregnation and the mean time to achieve spontaneous pregnancy was 21 months, which is agreement with the limited published data. A median treatment duration of 20.5, 20, and 23 months was found by Liu et al.,[17] Kung et al.,[33] and Burris et al.,[12] respectively. However, Liuet al.[17] also showed that the median sperm concentration with spontaneous pregnancy was 8.0 × 106 ml −1 and the median time to achieve spontaneous pregnancy was 28.2 months. This may be related to the long follow-up time for patients with restored spermatogenesis in the later study. Consequently, these results show that most patients with IHH who undergo gonadotropin treatment may have a child; however, treatment sessions may be prolonged.

In this study, there were no clear data for patients who had received androgen therapy before gonadotropin treatment. According to the current literature, there is no evidence that testosterone replacement treatment prior gonadotropins has an effect on fertility outcomes in patients with IHH. A single retrospective study found that prior testosterone therapy provided a poor prognostic factor for fertility outcomes.[17] However, the meta-analysis published by Rastrelli et al.[8] did not support the findings of that study.

In this study, patients did not undergo genetic testing for diagnosed Kallmann syndrome or normosmic IHH. Central HH may be associated with genetic mutation, as nearly 40% of patients typically have some genetic form of hypogonadism. Some mutation may be associated with partial or reversible GnRH deficiency, such as G protein-coupled receptor (GPR54) mutations.[34] Treatment-induced increases in total testosterone can be influenced by estradiol levels values, which were not assessed in our study, highlighting a potential limitation.


  Conclusion Top


The current medical approach for males with HH and azoospermia allows the successful induction of spermatogenesis for the achievement of pregnancy. Larger testicular volumes of descended testes and older age are positive predictive factors for successful spermatogenesis. Larger testicular volumes and older age also are positive factors for natural conception. Randomized controlled trials with greater patient numbers will be needed for future studies.


  Author Contributions Top


MO and AK contributed to the conception and design of the study. AB, YP, and CB acquired the data. MO, ES, and MH drafted the manuscript. MO and AK revised it for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


  Competing Interests Top


All authors declare no competing interests.



 
  References Top

1.
O'Shaughnessy PJ. Hormonal control of germ cell development and spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2014; 29: 55–65.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Boehm U, Bouloux PM, Dattani MT, de Roux N, Dode C, et al. Expert consensus document: European Consensus Statement on congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism – pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2015; 11: 547–64.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Silveira LF, Latronico AC. Approach to the patient with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 1781–8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Dohle GR, Colpi GM, Hargreave TB, Papp GK, Jungwirth A, et al. EAU guidelines on male infertility. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 703–11.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hayes F, Dwyer A, Pitteloud N. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) and gonadotropin therapy. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Feingold KR, Grossman A, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Dwyer AA, Sykiotis GP, Hayes FJ, Boepple PA, Lee H, et al. Trial of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone pretreatment for GnRH-induced fertility in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: E1790–5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rastrelli G, Vignozzi L, Maggi M. Different medications for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Endocr Dev 2016; 30: 60–78.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Rastrelli G, Corona G, Mannucci E, Maggi M. Factors affecting spermatogenesis upon gonadotropin-replacement therapy: a meta-analytic study. Andrology 2014; 2: 794–808.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Liu PY, Gebski VJ, Turner L, Conway AJ, Wishart SM, et al. Predicting pregnancy and spermatogenesis by survival analysis during gonadotrophin treatment of gonadotrophin-deficient infertile men. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 625–33.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
O'Shaughnessy PJ, Monteiro A, Verhoeven G, De Gendt K, Abel MH. Effect of FSH on testicular morphology and spermatogenesis in gonadotrophin-deficient hypogonadal mice lacking androgen receptors. Reproduction 2010; 139: 177–84.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ley SB, Leonard JM. Male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: factors influencing response to human chorionic gonadotropin and human menopausal gonadotropin, including prior exogenous androgens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1985; 61: 746–52.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Burris AS, Rodbard HW, Winters SJ, Sherins RJ. Gonadotropin therapy in men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: the response to human chorionic gonadotropin is predicted by initial testicular size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988; 66: 1144–51.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Dwyer AA, Raivio T, Pitteloud N. Gonadotrophin replacement for induction of fertility in hypogonadal men. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 29: 91–103.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
European Metrodin HP Study Group. Efficacy and safety of highly purified urinary follicle-stimulating hormone with human chorionic gonadotropin for treating men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 256–62.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Liu PY, Baker HW, Jayadev V, Zacharin M, Conway AJ, et al. Induction of spermatogenesis and fertility during gonadotropin treatment of gonadotropin-deficient infertile men: predictors of fertility outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 801–8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Warne DW, Decosterd G, Okada H, Yano Y, Koide N, et al. A combined analysis of data to identify predictive factors for spermatogenesis in men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism treated with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 594–604.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Matsumoto AM, Snyder PJ, Bhasin S, Martin K, Weber T, et al. Stimulation of spermatogenesis with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (follitropin alfa; GONAL-f ®): long-term treatment in azoospermic men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 979–90.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Bouloux P, Warne DW, Loumaye E; FSH Study Group in Men's Infertility. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 270–3.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Liu Z, Mao J, Wu X, Xu H, Wang X, et al. Efficacy and outcome predictors of gonadotropin treatment for male congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a retrospective study of 223 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95: e2867.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Pitteloud N, Hayes FJ, Dwyer A, Boepple PA, Lee H, et al. Predictors of outcome of long-term GnRH therapy in men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 4128–36.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Ishikawa T, Ooba T, Kondo Y, Yamaguchi K, Fujisawa M. Assessment of gonadotropin therapy in male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 1697–9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Dwyer AA, Raivio T, Pitteloud N. Management of endocrine disease: reversible hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Eur J Endocrinol 2016; 174: R267–74.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Spratt DI, Carr DB, Merriam GR, Scully RE, Rao PN, et al. The spectrum of abnormal patterns of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: clinical and laboratory correlations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987; 64: 283–91.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Miyagawa Y, Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Takao T, Tohda A, et al. Outcome of gonadotropin therapy for male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism at university affiliated male infertility centers: a 30-year retrospective study. J Urol 2005; 173: 2072–5.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Sakamoto H, Saito K, Ogawa Y, Yoshida H. Testicular volume measurements using prader orchidometer versus ultrasonography in patients with infertility. Urology 2007; 69: 158–62.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Zitzmann M, Nieschlag E. Hormone substitution in male hypogonadism. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 161: 73–88.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Han TS, Bouloux PM. What is the optimal therapy for young males with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2010; 72: 731–7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Rohayem J, Drechsel H, Tittel B, Hahn G, Pfaeffle R, et al. Long-term outcomes, genetics, and pituitary morphology in patients with isolated growth hormone deficiency and multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies: a single-centre experience of four decades of growth hormone replacement. Horm Res Paediatr 2016; 86: 106–16.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Farhat R, Al-zidjali F, Alzahrani AS. Outcome of gonadotropin therapy for male infertility due to hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Pituitary 2010; 13: 105–10.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Buchter D, Behre HM, Kliesch S, Nieschlag E. Pulsatile GnRH or human chorionic gonadotropin/human menopausal gonadotropin as effective treatment for men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a review of 42 cases. Eur J Endocrinol 1998; 139: 298–303.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Kung AW, Zhong YY, Lam KS, Wang C. Induction of spermatogenesis with gonadotrophins in Chinese men with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Int J Androl 1994; 17: 241–7.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Valdes-Socin H, Rubio Almanza M, Tome Fernandez-Ladreda M, Debray FG, Bours V, et al. Reproduction, smell, and neurodevelopmental disorders: genetic defects in different hypogonadotropic hypogonadal syndromes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2014; 5: 109.  Back to cited text no. 34
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

 
Top
 
 
  Search
 
 Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Ortac M
    -  Hidir M
    -  Salabas E
    -  Boyuk A
    -  Bese C
    -  Pazir Y
    -  Kadioglu A
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Author Contributions
Competing Interests
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed725    
    PDF Downloaded115    

Recommend this journal