|Ahead of print publication
Effect of prolactin on penile erection: a cross-sectional study
Zhi-He Xu1, Dong Pan1, Tong-Yan Liu1, Ming-Zhen Yuan1, Jian-Ye Zhang1, Shan Jiang1, Xue-Sheng Wang1, Yong Guan1, Sheng-Tian Zhao2,3
1 Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250011, China
2 Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong 250021, China
3 Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
|Date of Submission||21-Oct-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||04-Jan-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||30-Apr-2019|
Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong 250021, China; Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250011, China
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Although elevated prolactin levels have been shown to inhibit penile erection, the relationship between prolactin and erection of the penile tip or base has not been extensively researched. We therefore investigated the prolactin's effects on erection of the penile tip and base, with a cross-sectional study of 135 patients with erectile dysfunction, based on scores of ≤21 on the International Index of Erectile Function-5. All patients were tested for nocturnal penile tumescence, blood pressure, serum glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, prolactin, estradiol, testosterone, and progesterone. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the associations between prolactin levels and erection at the penile tip and base. We found no obvious relationship between erection time at penile tip and prolactin levels, but observed a negative correlation between base erection time and prolactin level (hazard ratio: −2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −5.13–−0.22). With increasing prolactin concentration, multivariate analysis showed obvious reduction in base erection time among patients with normal Rigiscan results (hazard ratio: −3.10; 95% CI: −7.96–1.77; P < 0.05). Our data indicate that prolactin inhibits penile erection, particularly at the penile base. In addition, when the effective erection time of the penile base lasts longer than 10 min, prolactin has a more obvious inhibitory effect on penile base erection.
Keywords: erectile dysfunction; penile base; penile tip; prolactin; Rigiscan
Article in PDF
|How to cite this URL:|
Xu ZH, Pan D, Liu TY, Yuan MZ, Zhang JY, Jiang S, Wang XS, Guan Y, Zhao ST. Effect of prolactin on penile erection: a cross-sectional study. Asian J Androl [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2019 May 27]. Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/preprintarticle.asp?id=257475
| Introduction|| |
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the recurrent or consistent inability to achieve and maintain a sufficient erection to permit satisfactory sexual intercourse. A meta-analysis consortium study reported that ED was present in nearly 17% of all European males in 2004 and that it will affect 322 million European males by 2025.,
ED may result from psychological, neurologic, hormonal, arterial, or cavernosal impairment or from a combination of these factors., This study was performed to investigate the relationship between prolactin (PRL) and ED.
PRL is a 23 kDa-polypeptide hormone secreted by pituitary lactotroph cells, under negative dopaminergic and positive serotoninergic control.,,, Unlike other hormones secreted by the anterior pituitary gland, PRL secretion is controlled primarily by inhibition from the hypothalamus and is not subject to negative feedback, directly or indirectly, by peripheral hormones. It self-inhibits by a countercurrent flow in the hypophyseal pituitary portal system, which initiates secretion of hypothalamic dopamine and inhibits pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH).
Previous studies have shown that elevated PRL inhibits penile erection.,,, However, few studies have shown a relationship between PRL and erection of the penile tip or penile base. The potential relationship between ED and PRL led us to investigate the relationship between PRL levels and erections of the penile tip and penile base.
| Patients and Methods|| |
This study included 135 patients with ED, based on scores of ≤21 on the International Index of Erectile Function-5 from January 2012 to November 2017 at our Andrology Clinic at the Department of Urology in the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China. This clinical study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Shandong University. All participants gave written informed consent to participate in the study. Men were included in the study if they had ED longer than 3 months' duration. We excluded patients who had (a) a history of neurologic disease, (b) genital or spinal cord injuries, (c) morbid obesity, (d) use of drugs that affect erectile function, (e) severe heart disease, (f) bleeding disorders, (g) penile fibrosis, (h) hypertension, (i) diabetes, (j) hypogonadism, and/or (k) abnormal androgen profile.
Thorough ED histories were taken from all patients in this study. They also received general, genital, neuromonitoring (i.e., nerve assessment), ultrasonography (i.e., arterial and venous assessment), and urologic physical examinations, blood analyses that included serum glucose, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), PRL, progesterone (P), estradiol (E), and testosterone (T). The assays were performed at the laboratory of the Second Hospital of Shandong University, using a biochemical analyzer (Modular Analytics, Roche, Mannheim, Germany).
Nocturnal penile tumescence tests were performed in all patients using the Rigiscan device (Timm Medical Technologies, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, USA).,, To reduce interference with sleep quality, the device was applied to each patient's penis for 3 consecutive nights; changes in penile tumescence and radial rigidity were recorded throughout the duration of each night. To ensure accurate readings, patients were asked to avoid insomnia, caffeine, or alcohol intake and to evacuate their bladders before going to sleep. After each monitoring period, all data were transferred to a personal computer and analyzed by Rigiscan device (Timm Medical Technologies, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, USA). The software recognized an erectile event if there was a 20% increase in loop circumference of ≥3 min in duration. We recorded erection time and rigidity. All patients had normal nocturnal erectile activity, which comprised at least one erection with rigidity of ≥60% at penile tip or base, lasting longer than 10 min as documented by the Rigiscan. We considered rigidity of ≥60% to be an effective erection.
For both tip and base erections, we chose the recorded effective erection with the longest duration, and then divided participants into those whose longest-lasting effective erection was at the tip (tip group) and those whose longest-lasting effective erection was at the base (base group). We then divided the base group into two subgroups: those whose effective erection time was >10 min (Group 1) and those whose effective erection time was ≤10 min (Group 2). All research subjects were ED patients, including both organic ED (for which a physical cause could be found) and psychological ED (for which no physical cause could be found). We supposed that, if after all examinations (including the Rigiscan), we found no physical abnormality indicative of organic ED, then the patient's ED was psychological in nature.
Statistical analyses were performed using Empower Stats software, version 2.18.5 (X&Y Solutions Inc., Boston, MA, USA). Baseline characteristics were presented as mean ± standard deviation (s.d.). We conducted regression analysis to fit the smoothing curve. Univariate analyses were performed to determine the significance of variables. Subsequently, multivariate analyses were performed to determine whether PRL levels were independently associated with tip or base erections after adjusting for likely confounders, including age, systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, blood glucose, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, FSH, E, LH, or P.
| Results|| |
Basic characteristics of all 135 patients are shown in [Table 1]. Their mean age was 33.97 ± 10.70 years old. Their mean concentrations of PRL and T were 14.43 ± 6.63 μg l −1 and 4.58 ± 1.52 μg l −1, respectively. Univariate analysis showed a stronger correlation between PRL level and Base 60 (hazard ratio [HR]: −0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.88–0) than that between PRL level and Tip 60 (HR: −0.48, 95% CI: −1.56–0.59).
|Table 1: General characteristics of all patients and univariate analysis result|
Click here to view
The smoothing curve showed that Tip 60 increased linearly with PRL [Figure 1]. Base 60 was inversely correlated with PRL level. After adjusting for age, systolic BP, diastolic BP, blood glucose, TC, HDL, LDL, FSH, E, T, LH, P, and total tip duration (the total time of penile tip erection), multivariate analyses showed that a unit increase in PRL was associated with an increase of 0.46 min (95% CI: −0.80–1.72) in Tip 60 [Table 2]. After adjusting for age, systolic BP, diastolic BP, blood glucose, TC, TG, HDL, LDL, FSH, E, T, LH, and P, a unit increase in PRL was associated with a decrease of 2.68 min (95% CI: −5.13–−0.22) in Base 60 (P < 0.05; [Table 3]. We found no obvious relationship between penile tip erection time and PRL level, but observed a negative correlation between penile base erection time and PRL level (HR: −2.68; 95% CI: −5.13–−0.22).
|Figure 1: Smoothing curve of Tip 60 or Base 60 by PRL. PRL: prolactin; Tip 60: the time penile tip rigidity >60%; Base 60: the time penile base rigidity >60%.|
Click here to view
Basic characteristics of patients in Groups 1 and 2 are shown in [Supplementary Table 1 [Additional file 1]]. There were 55 patients in Group 1 and 80 patients in Group 2. The mean age of patients in Group 1 (33.91 ± 11.78 years) was similar to that of patients in Group 2 (34.01 ± 9.96 years). Patients in Group 1 had a higher mean PRL level (14.47 ± 5.82 μg l −1) than did patients in Group 2 (14.40 ± 7.31 μg l −1). Base 60 in Group 2 was much higher than that in Group 1 (40.72 ± 41.65 min versus 2.54 ± 2.75 min). Group 1 had higher mean blood glucose, TC, TG, LDL, and FSH levels than Group 2; Group 1 had lower mean HDL, E, LH, T, and P levels than Group 2.
Univariate analysis showed a stronger correlation between PRL levels and Group 2 (HR: −0.93, 95% CI: −2.24–0.38) than for Group 1 (HR: −0.03, 95% CI: −0.15–0.09) (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis result showed that, for each unit increase in PRL level, mean erection duration decreased by 0.08 min (95% CI: −0.30–0.13) in Group 1, and by 2.31 min (95% CI: −5.58–0.96) in Group 2, after adjusting for age, systolic BP, diastolic BP, blood glucose, TC, and TG. For each unit increase in PRL level, mean erection duration decreased by 0.07 min (95% CI: −0.35–0.21) in Group 1, and by 3.10 min (95% CI: −7.96–1.77) in Group 2, after adjusting for age, systolic BP, diastolic BP, blood glucose, TC, HDL, LDL, FSH, E, T, LH, and P (P < 0.05; [Table 4] and [Table 5]).
| Discussion|| |
ED is a common condition which interferes with quality of life of affected persons. The World Health Organization states that sexual well-being is essential to the physical and emotional health of individuals, couples, and families and the social and economic improvement of countries.
Penile erection is a neurovascular event modulated by psychological factors and hormonal status. When sexual stimulation, the cavernous nerve terminals release the neurotransmitters and the endothelial cells in the penile release the relaxing factors, resulting in the relaxation of penile vascular smooth muscle and a several-fold increase in penile blood flow. At the same time, relaxation of the trabecular smooth muscle increases the compliance of the sinusoids, facilitating rapid filling and expansion of the sinusoidal system. The subtunical venular plexuses are thus compressed between the trabeculae and the tunica albuginea, resulting in almost total occlusion of venous outflow., These events trap the blood within the corpora cavernosa and raise the penis from a dependent position to an erect position, with an intracavernous pressure of approximately 100 mmHg (the phase of full erection). PRL secretion is under the inhibitory control by hypothalamic dopamine, and dopamine secretion is influenced by PRL release. PRL has been suggested to have a role in modulating sexual behavior and activity, through central or peripheral mechanisms. The central mechanisms are likely mediated by the dopaminergic system, which regulates both PRL secretion and sexual function. Notably, dopamine is a major modulator of sexual function;, moreover, PRL may influence erectile function by modulating dopaminergic function at specific brain sites.,,, The mutual interaction between PRL and dopamine, together with the well-known effects of PRL on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, supports the role of PRL as a hormone that regulates sexual function. Elevated PRL is associated with impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. In the central nervous system, hyperprolactinemia inhibits centers that control sexual desire and erection; experiments in mouse models have suggested that inhibition of erectile function occurs through the induction of hyperprolactinemia at a supraspinal level within the central nervous system. Under physiological conditions, PRL specifically binds to Leydig cells and promotes secretion of T by interstitial cells through downstream action of LH; moreover, it acts on the epididymis and prostate to maintain the functionality of the accessory gonads and promote sperm production. Androgen can indirectly promote penile erection by mechanisms such as enhancing sexual desire and sexual arousal; moreover, it plays an important role in maintaining normal erectile tissue structure of the penis. T deficiency can lead to reduction of trabecular smooth muscle, increased extracellular matrix, deposition of subadhesive fat cells, and other physiological problems. During the erection process, the above changes in the penile tissue may cause venous leak due to venous occlusion, resulting in erectile dysfunction. Excessive PRL can inhibit the release of FSH and LH through the central nervous system, thereby reducing the synthesis and secretion of sex hormones, which affects sperm maturation. In addition, excessive PRL destroys the synergistic effect of gonadotropin, which directly affects gonadotropin, as well as the responsiveness of accessory gonads to gonadotropin; it also affects the metabolism, motion, and capacitation of sperm, which can reduce male gonad function. Peripherally, chronic hyperprolactinemia has been found to arrest penile erection viadirect action at the vascular level in the penile corpus cavernosumof dogs.
Elevated PRL alters the balance among neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and hormones involved in libido and erection, affecting dopaminergic tone. An imbalance is generated between dopamine which stimulates sexual function, and serotonin which inhibits sexual function. At the neuroendocrine level, elevated PRL decreases GnRH expression, interferes with GnRH action, inhibits gonadotrophin secretion, reduces T to dihydrotestosterone conversion, and decreases central dopamine action.,,, Some data in animal models have associated acute increases in serum PRL levels with arrested penile erection, probably via inhibition of smooth muscle relaxation of the penile corpus cavernosum.,
Past studies demonstrated that PRL has a negative effect on erectile function., However, to our knowledge, few studies have shown a relationship between PRL and erections at the penile tip or penile base. In addition, there are no uniform standards for normal erections, as determined by Rigiscan analysis. In our present study, univariate analyses confirmed that PRL affected male erectile function. However, we have shown, for the first time, that PRL levels are not strongly associated with penile tip erection duration, and that they are inversely related to penile base erection duration [Figure 1]. Multivariate analysis showed that PRL level was independently associated with Tip 60 or Base 60, after adjusting for some confounders. Therefore, we concluded that the penile base was more meaningful than the penile tip in assessing the effect of PRL on erectile function, and we performed further analysis of the base group.
By study the Group 1 and Group 2 in Base 60, we could know that the effects of prolactin on the same position of the penile were different as the effective erection changes. In univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, Group 2 showed a greater change than Group 1 in Base 60 when PRL increased. We supposed that the longer the effective erection lasted, the more obvious the effects of prolactin was. We would do further experiments to verify this hypothesis in the future.
The study showed that PRL had a greater effect on the penile base than the penile tip; additionally, there was a more obvious inhibitory effect on base erections when the effective erection lasted longer than 10 min. We concluded that in patients whose effective erections lasted longer than 10 min, the cause of ED was not organic, but psychological.
We suggest that the differences between the penile tip and penile base should be considered when we study the relationship between penile erectile dysfunction and PRL using Rigiscan analysis; base data comprise a more reliable reference set, which will enable more effective and more accurate research.
This study had several limitations. First, there were relatively few subjects and a low number of variables, which might have affected our results. In addition, normal PRL ranges might vary slightly among different laboratory machines, and should therefore be adjusted on the basis of these machines. A series of comprehensive blinded validation studies are warranted to confirm the clinical effects of PRL.
| Conclusions|| |
In conclusion, we confirmed that PRL inhibits erectile function. We also found that the penile base is more sensitive to PRL than the penile tip. In addition, for penile base effective erections that last longer than 10 min, PRL has a more obvious inhibitory effect on penile base erection.
| Author Contributions|| |
STZ and YG designed this study; ZHX performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript; and DP, TYL, MZY, JYZ, SJ, and XSW collected the data and helped design the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
| Competing Interests|| |
All authors declared no competing interests.
| Acknowledgments|| |
This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81670625 and No. 81470969), the Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (No. ZR2017BH104, No. ZR2018MH006, No. ZR2018BH007 and No. ZR2015PH023), and the Youth Foundation and Youth Talent Foundation of the Second Hospital of Shandong University (No. 2018YT32 and No. Y2015010038).
Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Asian Journal of Andrology website.
| References|| |
NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH consensus development panel on impotence. JAMA
1993; 270: 83–90.
Ayta IA, McKinlay JB, Krane RJ. The likely worldwide increase in erectile dysfunction between 1995 and 2025 and some possible policy consequences. BJU Int
1999; 84: 50–6.
de Boer BJ, Bots ML, Lycklama a Nijeholt AA, Moors JP, Pieters HM, et al
. Erectile dysfunction in primary care: prevalence and patient characteristics. The ENIGMA study. Int J Impot Res
2004; 16: 358–64.
Grainger R. Erectile dysfunction. Lancet
2013; 381: 153–65.
Muneer A, Kalsi J, Nazareth I, Arya M. Erectile dysfunction. BMJ
2014; 348: g129.
Benjonathan N, Lapensee CR, Lapensee EW. What can we learn from rodents about prolactin in humans? Endocr Rev
2008; 29: 1–41.
Bachelot A, Binart N. Reproductive role of prolactin. Reproduction
2007; 133: 361–9.
Bolefeysot C, Goffin V, Edery M, Binart N, Kelly PA. Prolactin (PRL) and its receptor: actions, signal transduction pathways and phenotypes observed in PRL receptor knockout mice. Endocr Rev
1998; 19: 225.
Sobrinho LG. Prolactin, psychological stress and environment in humans: adaptation and maladaptation. Pituitary
2003; 6: 35–9.
Abha M, Sharma MN. Hyperprolactinemia. J Hum Reprod Sci
Buvat J. Hyperprolactinemia and sexual function in men: a short review. Int J Impot Res
2003; 15: 373–7.
Doherty PC, Baum MJ, Todd RB. Effects of chronic hyperprolactinemia on sexual arousal and erectile function in male rats. Neuroendocrinology
1986; 42: 368–75.
Aoki H, Fujioka T, Matsuzaka J, Kubo T, Nakamura K, et al
. Suppression by prolactin of the electrically induced erectile response through its direct effect on the corpus cavernosum penis in the dog. J Urol
1995; 154: 595–600.
Ra S, Aoki H, Fujioka T, Sato F, Kubo T, et al
. In vitro
contraction of the canine corpus cavernosum penis by direct perfusion with prolactin or growth hormone. J Urol
1996; 156: 522–5.
Bradley WE, Timm GW, Gallagher JM, Johnson BK. New method for continuous measurement of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity. Urology
1985; 26: 4–9.
Hatzichristou DG, Hatzimouratidis K, Ioannides E, Yannakoyorgos K, Dimitriadis G, et al
. Nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring in young potent volunteers: reproducibility, evaluation criteria and the effect of sexual intercourse. J Urol
1998; 159: 1921–6.
Hatzichristou D, Rosen RC, Derogatis LR, Low WY, Meuleman EJ, et al
. Recommendations for the clinical evaluation of men and women with sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med
2010; 7(1 Pt 2): 337–48.
Yaman O, Tokatli Z, Ozdiler E, Anafarta K. Effect of aging on quality of nocturnal erections: evaluation with NPTR testing. Int J Impot Res
2004; 16: 150–3.
World Health Organization. Promotion of sexual health: recommendations for action. Antigua Guatemala: World Association for Sexology; 2000.
Fournier GR Jr, Juenemann KP, Lue TF, Tanagho EA. Mechanisms of venous occlusion during canine penile erection: an anatomic demonstration. J Urol
1987; 137: 163–7.
Banya Y, Ushiki T, Takagane H, Aoki H, Kubo T, et al
. Two circulatory routes within the human corpus cavernosum penis: a scanning electron microscopic study of corrosion casts. J Urol
1989; 142: 879–83.
Goffin V, Binart N, Touraine P, Kelly PA. Prolactin: the new biology of an old hormone. Annu Rev Physiol
2002; 64: 47–67.
Jern P. The endocrinology of sexual arousal. J Endocrinol
2005; 186: 411–27.
Genazzani AR, Gastaldi M, Bidzinska B, Mercuri N, Genazzani AD, et al
. The brain as a target organ of gonadal steroids. Psychoneuroendocrinology
1992; 17: 385–90.
Mangurian LP, Walsh RJ, Posner BI. Prolactin enhancement of its own uptake at the choroid plexus. Endocrinology
1992; 131: 698–702.
Mohankumar PS, Mohankumar SM, Arbogast L, Quadri SK, Voogt JL. Effects of chronic hyperprolactinemia on tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic neurons. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
1998; 217: 461–5.
Paradisi R, Grossi G, Pintore A, Venturoli S, Porcu E, et al
. Evidence for a pathological reduction in brain dopamine metabolism in idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Acta Endocrinol
1991; 125: 246–52.
Hull EM, Bitran D, Pehek EA, Warner RK, Band LC, et al
. Dopaminergic control of male sex behavior in rats: effects of an intracerebrally-infused agonist. Brain Res
1986; 370: 73–81.
Galdiero M, Pivonello R, Grasso LF, Cozzolino A, Colao A. Growth hormone, prolactin, and sexuality. J Endocrinol Invest
2012; 35: 782–94.
Devoto CE, Aravena CL. [Hyperprolactinemia and sexual dysfunction among males]. Rev Chil Endocrinol Diabetes
2015; 8: 25-31. [Article in Spanish].
Delavierre D, Girard P, Peneau M, Ibrahim H. [Should plasma prolactin assay be routinely performed in the assessment of erectile dysfunction? Report of a series of 445 patients. Review of the literature]. Prog Urol
1999; 9: 1097–101. [Article in French].
De RM, Zarrilli S, Vitale G, Di SC, Orio F, et al
. Six months of treatment with cabergoline restores sexual potency in hyperprolactinemic males: an open longitudinal study monitoring nocturnal penile tumescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2004; 89: 621–5.
Soran H, Wu FC. Endocrine causes of erectile dysfunction. Int J Androl
2010; 28: 28–34.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]