Article Cited by others


Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses

Otero Javier Romero, Cruz César Rojas, Gómez Borja García, Geli Joaquim Sarquella, Polo Jose Medina, Castañé Eduard Ruiz, Antolín Alfredo Rodríguez

Year : 2017| Volume: 19| Issue : 3 | Page no: 321-325

   This article has been cited by
1 Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples’ Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation
Selahittin Çayan,Ramazan Asci,Ozan Efesoy,Mustafa Suat Bolat,Erdem Akbay,Önder Yaman
The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2019;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Effects of penile fracture and its surgical treatment on psychosocial and sexual function
M S Bolat,M Özen,K Önem,A Açikgöz,R Asci
International Journal of Impotence Research. 2017;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Comparative evaluation of physical characteristics of different inflatable penile prostheses
Paholo Barboglio Romo,Harshitha Prakash Chikkatur,Sahana Beldona,Yooni Yi,Tim M. Bruns,Bahaa S. Malaeb
Scandinavian Journal of Urology. 2017; : 1
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Long-term patient-reported satisfaction with different inflatable penile prosthesis: Comparison between AMS 700CX and Coloplast Titan
Afonso Morgado,Ana Sofía Cavadas,Luis Pacheco Figueiredo,Nuno Tomada
Revista Internacional de Andrología. 2017;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
5 The Multiple-Slit Technique (MUST) for Penile Length and Girth Restoration
Paulo H. Egydio,Franklin E. Kuehhas
The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2017;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]


Read this article