INVITED REVIEW
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 15-19

Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics


Prosthetic Urology Research and Development, Boston Scientific, Minnetonka, MN 55343, USA

Correspondence Address:
Jonathan J Lund
Prosthetic Urology Research and Development, Boston Scientific, Minnetonka, MN 55343
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_115_19

Rights and Permissions

For patients with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction, implantable penile prostheses continue to be a viable treatment. Medical device developers apply design controls during the development cycle to ensure that a product performs as intended in the final use environment. This process relies heavily on the principles of systems engineering and documents every facet of performance, unmet need, and risk. To better understand design philosophy, it is important to frame benchmarked performance outcomes in the context of the ideal state. Careful consideration of erectile anatomy and physiology, including flaccid state, transitional phases, and full tumescence, informs penile prosthesis design philosophy and provides the foundation for product advancement.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1463    
    Printed88    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded160    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal