Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 56-61

Pretreatment serum albumin/globulin ratio as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with maximal androgen blockade


1 Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
2 Institute of Prostate Disease of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
3 Center for Molecular Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
4 Hunan Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China

Date of Submission30-Nov-2017
Date of Acceptance15-May-2018
Date of Web Publication17-Jul-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Le-Ye He
Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China; Institute of Prostate Disease of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_50_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


The pretreatment serum albumin/globulin ratio (AGR) has been used as a prognostic biomarker for various cancer types. However, the prognostic value of the AGR for prostate cancer, especially for metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) after maximal androgen blockade (MAB), remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the pretreatment serum AGR for mPCa treated with MAB. This retrospective study included 214 mPCa patients receiving MAB from October 2007 to March 2017. The correlation of the AGR with survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. The cutoff value of the AGR was 1.45 according to the receiver operating characteristic curve. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with a low AGR (<1.45) had poor outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Multivariate Cox analyses showed that the AGR was an independent predictor of PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.642; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.430–0.957; P = 0.030) and CSS (HR = 0.412; 95% CI: 0.259–0.654; P < 0.001). Furthermore, in a subset of 79 patients with normal serum albumin levels (≥40.0 g l−1), the serum AGR remained an independent predictor of CSS (P = 0.009). The pretreatment AGR was an independent prognostic biomarker for PFS and CSS in patients with mPCa receiving MAB. In addition, the AGR remained effective for the prediction of CSS in patients with normal albumin levels (≥40 g l−1). However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm our conclusions.

Keywords: albumin/globulin ratio; maximal androgen blockade; metastatic prostate cancer; prognosis; survival


How to cite this article:
Wang N, Liu JY, Li X, Deng MH, Long Z, Tang J, Yao K, Zhang YC, He LY. Pretreatment serum albumin/globulin ratio as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with maximal androgen blockade. Asian J Androl 2019;21:56-61

How to cite this URL:
Wang N, Liu JY, Li X, Deng MH, Long Z, Tang J, Yao K, Zhang YC, He LY. Pretreatment serum albumin/globulin ratio as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with maximal androgen blockade. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 22];21:56-61. Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2019/21/1/56/236940 - DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_50_18




  Introduction Top


Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death among American men.[1] In China, the incidence of PCa rapidly increased from 2000 to 2011.[2] The factors driving the increase of PCa include gradual implementation of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, improved biopsy techniques,[3] and the impact of a Westernized lifestyle.[4],[5] Unlike patients in Western countries, most newly diagnosed Chinese patients already have metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa).[6]

As one of the hormonal therapies, maximal androgen blockade (MAB) offers a survival benefit comparable to that of castration alone.[7] Furthermore, MAB showed much better survival advantages than luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist monotherapy.[8],[9] Currently, many indices, including clinical stage, tumor grade, and the circulating concentration of PSA,[10] are used to determine the disease stage in PCa patients. Although PCa is a genetic disease, chronic inflammation promotes cancer progression.[11],[12],[13] Inflammatory mediators such as cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, prostaglandins, and reactive oxygen and nitrogen species are potential biomarkers.[14] Moreover, the prognostic value of such molecular markers such as Ki-67,[15] p53,[16] B cell leukemia/lymphoma (Bcl)-2,[17] and interleukin (IL)-1β and interferon (IFN)-β[18] in PCa specimens has been evaluated by immunohistochemistry. However, these biomarkers are not commonly applied in clinical practice due to high costs and the lack of standardization. In addition, due to the high proportion of newly diagnosed mPCa patients in China and the poor prognosis of mPCa compared to that of localized PCa, blood parameters that are simple, easy to access, and labor-saving are essential for predicting the therapeutic efficacy in mPCa.

Globulin (GLB) and albumin (ALB) are major components of human serum proteins that play significant roles in inflammatory responses. GLB functions as a carrier of the sex hormones and is of great importance to immunity and inflammation. Hypoalbuminemia is an indicator of poor nutritional status and is related to chronic inflammation in cancer patients.[19],[20] Low serum ALB has been used to evaluate the progression and prognosis of several types of cancers, including PCa.[20],[21],[22] The serum albumin/globulin ratio (AGR) may be used as a prognostic marker for colorectal cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.[23],[24],[25],[26] However, the prognostic value of the AGR in mPCa has not been confirmed.

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate whether the pretreatment AGR could be used as a predictor of mortality in mPCa patients receiving MAB.


  Patients and Methods Top


Patients

Two hundred and fourteen mPCa patients who received MAB as the first-line therapy between October 2007 and March 2017 were included in this study. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (Changsha, China). All patients gave informed written consent before they were enrolled in this study. The diagnosis of mPCa was confirmed by needle biopsy and pathohistological examination. The Gleason score (GS) was assessed by senior pathologists. The serum PSA level was determined. Clinical staging was performed according to the results of a clinical examination, bone scanning, and computed tomography and/or pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MAB was defined as continuous hormonal therapy using an LHRH agonist and an oral antiandrogen. No patient received any other first-line treatment such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Patients with any evidence of active infection or coexisting hematologic disease were excluded.

Data collection

General clinical data were acquired from patient records and included demographic parameters and clinical characteristics. Peripheral blood was collected before breakfast between 7 a.m. and 8 a.m. during the stay in hospital 1 day before starting MAB therapy. Serum chemical analysis and complete blood counts were performed in the central laboratory of the Third Xiangya Hospital. Blood counts were conducted using a Sysmex XE-5000 automated hematology analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan). Serum ALB and total serum protein levels were determined using an automated immunoturbidimetric analyzer (Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). The AGR was calculated using the equation AGR = ALB/(total serum protein − ALB).

Follow-up

All patients were followed up at 3-month intervals during the first 3 years after diagnosis, at 6-month intervals in years 4–5, and at 12-month intervals in years 6–11. mPCa was evaluated by measuring serum PSA levels and digital rectal examinations. PSA relapse was defined as three consecutive increases in PSA, 1 week apart, resulting in two 50% increases over the nadir with a PSA level >2.0 ng ml−1.[7] Patients with PSA relapse were further examined for local and/or distant recurrences by isotope bone scan, chest X-ray, and abdominal and pelvic MRI.

Statistical analyses

The first endpoint for progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the duration from the start of MAB to the occurrence of the first evidence of biochemical or clinical progression. The second endpoint for cancer-specific survival (CSS) was defined as the time from diagnosis to death due to mPCa. The ideal cutoff value of the pretreatment serum AGR was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, according to the surviving and deceased patients, as the value with the highest Youden's index. Differences in continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U-test, and differences in categorical data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Clinical endpoints were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and were compared by the log rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to assess the relative effect of the AGR on PFS and CSS. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


Identification of the optimal cutoff value for the AGR

Using ROC curve analysis, we found that an AGR = 1.45 was the strongest prognostic point for CSS [Figure 1]. The area under the curve (AUC) for the AGR was 0.795 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.735–0.855, Youden's index = 0.487, sensitivity = 0.774, specificity = 0.713, P < 0.001). According to the optimal cutoff value, of the total 214 patients, 100 (46.7%) were in the low AGR group (<1.45) and 114 (53.3%) were in the high AGR group (≥1.45).
Figure 1: The receiver operating characteristic curve for the pretherapeutic serum albumin/globulin ratio depending on cancer-specific survival.

Click here to view


Clinicopathological features

The distribution of clinicopathological features in the AGR subgroups is described in [Table 1], while the actual serum ALB and GLB values of patients are shown in [Supplementary Table 1 [Additional file 1]]. Patients with a pretreatment AGR ≥1.45 had a higher prevalence of younger age (P = 0.024) and high body mass index (BMI, P = 0.020). Serum ALB and hemoglobin level were lower in the low AGR group than in the high AGR group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). In addition, patients in the low AGR group had significantly higher neutrophil counts than patients in the high AGR group (P < 0.001). No differences were found for the PSA, GS, white blood cell count, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) (P > 0.05).
Table 1: The clinicopathological characteristics stratified by the albumin/globulin ratio level in 214 patients

Click here to view


Relationship between the pretreatment AGR and PFS

The mean follow-up duration was 34.79 months. During follow-up, 126 of 214 patients (58.9%) experienced tumor progression, including 68 of 100 (68.0%) patients in the low AGR group and 58 of 114 (50.9%) patients in the high AGR group.

The Kaplan–Meier curve showed significantly higher PFS rates in the high AGR group than in the low AGR group (P = 0.004, [Figure 2]). Univariate Cox regression analyses showed that the risk of disease progression was higher in the low AGR group (P = 0.005, [Table 2]). The univariate analysis also showed that PFS was significantly associated with BMI, PSA, GS, ALB, hemoglobin, neutrophil count, and ECOG PS (P < 0.05 for BMI, PSA, GS, ALB, hemoglobin, neutrophil count, and ECOG PS). In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for the effects of these parameters, we found that only the pretreatment AGR (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.642; 95% CI: 0.430–0.957; P = 0.030), PSA (P = 0.012), GS (P < 0.001), and hemoglobin (HR = 0.981; 95% CI: 0.971–0.992; P < 0.001) were independent predictors of PFS [Table 2].
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test (P = 0.004) showing progression-free survival according to the pretherapeutic optimal value of the serum albumin/globulin ratio in all 214 mPCa patients after MAB. AGR: albumin/globulin ratio; mPCa: metastatic prostate cancer; MAB: maximal androgen blockade.

Click here to view
Table 2: Prognostic value of the albumin/globulin ratio by univariate and multivariate analyses regarding progression-free survival in 214 patients

Click here to view


Relationship between the pretreatment AGR and CSS

A total 108 patients (50.5%) died from mPCa; the proportions of death in the low and high AGR group were 77.0% (77/100) and 27.2% (31/114), respectively.

In the univariate analysis, CSS was closely associated with the following parameters: age, BMI, PSA, GS, ALB, hemoglobin, neutrophil count, AGR, and ECOG PS (P < 0.05 for all, [Table 3]). In the multivariate analysis, the pretreatment AGR (HR = 0.412; 95% CI: 0.259–0.654; P < 0.001, [Table 3]) was independently associated with CSS. Other independent factors of CSS were PSA (P = 0.023), GS (P = 0.022), and hemoglobin (HR = 0.983; 95% CI: 0.972–0.994; P = 0.003). In addition, Kaplan–Meier analysis and log rank testing indicated that patients with a low AGR had shorter CSS than those with a high AGR (P < 0.001, [Figure 3]).
Table 3: Prognostic value of the albumin/globulin ratio by univariate and multivariate analyses regarding cancer-specific survival in 214 patients

Click here to view
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test (P < 0.001) showing cancer-specific survival according to the pretherapeutic optimal value of the serum albumin/globulin ratio in all 214 mPCa patients after MAB. AGR: albumin/globulin ratio; mPCa: metastatic prostate cancer; MAB: maximal androgen blockade.

Click here to view


Additional analyses for normal serum ALB

The aim of the additional analyses was to determine whether the pretreatment AGR had prognostic value for patients with a normal serum ALB level. Therefore, survival analysis was performed including only patients with ALB ≥40.0 g l−1 (n = 79). Similarly, among these patients, the 5-year CSS was 33.0% in the low AGR group and 70.0% in the high AGR group. Moreover, in this subset of 79 patients with normal serum ALB level, the multivariate analysis indicated that the serum AGR remained an independent predictor of CSS (P = 0.009).


  Discussion Top


In the present study, the pretreatment serum AGR level was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and CSS in mPCa patients treated with MAB. Furthermore, patients with a low AGR had a 1.56-fold and 2.43-fold increased risk of progression and cancer-related death, respectively, compared to that of patients with a high AGR.

Serum ALB produced by the liver is a major serum protein. Serum ALB can maintain intravascular oncotic pressure, facilitate the transport of substances, and act as a free radical scavenger.[21] The serum ALB level is accurate for prediction of malnutrition and subsequent survival in cancer patients.[27] Malnutrition, by reducing muscle mass and subsequently affecting the functional status of individuals, is an established risk factor for adverse perioperative outcomes.[28] Malnutrition weakens human defense mechanisms such as anatomic barriers, cellular and humoral immunity, and phagocyte function.[29] Consequently, patients may be ineligible for therapy, resulting in poorer survival than patients who have higher serum ALB levels. Moreover, serum ALB should also be considered as an inflammatory response marker and a reliable indicator of morbidity and mortality, reflecting disease severity.[30] Malignancy and tissue necrosis decrease the synthesis of ALB.[31] A decreased serum ALB concentration in cancer patients may result from the production of cytokines such as IL-6, which inhibits the production of albumin by hepatocytes.[32] In addition, the serum level of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α is elevated in patients with cachexia-associated chronic diseases, such as cancer, and inhibits albumin synthesis at the transcriptional level even before the onset of weight loss.[33]

GLB (total serum protein—ALB), another major protein produced by immune organs that reflects the immune state,[34] consists of various proinflammatory proteins, including C-reactive protein (CRP), complement components, and immunoglobulins. Elevated serum CRP indicates poor prognosis in mPCa patients.[35] High levels of alpha GLB and complement 3 are correlated with a poor prognosis in several cancer types.[36],[37] Furthermore, the serum GLB level increased with stimulation of inflammation, and it was associated with poor survival in cancer patients.[38],[39]

Chronic inflammation has been associated with PCa development due to the paracrine actions of cytokines, adhesion molecules, and mediators of angiogenesis generated by the inflammatory response.[40],[41],[42] In addition, inflammatory mediators and cytokines were also involved in tumor progression and metastasis.[43] We propose that both the nutritional status and systemic inflammatory response play important roles in the survival of mPCa patients treated with MAB.

Since the serum ALB level is affected by various factors, including stress, tissue necrosis, and cancers, ALB alone may be insufficient to be widely used in clinical practice to predict the survival of mPCa patients, and the same applies to GLB. Compared to other nutritional or inflammatory indictors, the AGR may be a superior predictor for mPCa patients by combining two aspects of adverse outcomes. Many studies have indicated that the AGR might be used to predict the long-term survival of cancer patients. For example, Zhou et al.[44] suggested that small-cell lung cancer patients with a pretreatment serum AGR <1.29 had a 1.35 times higher risk of death than those with an AGR ≥1.29. Mao et al.[45] showed that a serum AGR <1.50 indicated poorer overall survival in patients with gastric cancer. In our study, a pretreatment serum AGR <1.45 was an independent prognostic factor for poor PFS and CSS in mPCa patients treated with MAB. The formation of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor[46] and the circulating tumor cell count[47] in the peripheral blood has been associated with the prognosis of mPCa, but these markers are difficult to widely apply in clinical practice due to the lack of standardization. However, compared to these markers, the serum AGR is a more general biochemical index and does not impose an additional financial burden on patients.

We also showed that the AGR remained a predictor of CSS in patients with normal ALB values (≥40.0 g l−1). A low AGR is not only useful for determining malnutrition but also useful for indicating chronic inflammation. As a consequence, the AGR should be evaluated before therapeutic modalities are determined for mPCa patients, and nutritional support and anti-inflammatory treatment may be administered in advance for patients with an AGR <1.45. Daugherty et al.[48] suggested that regular use of non-aspirin nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but not aspirin, was associated with a reduction of bladder cancer risk. Further research should be designed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of anti-inflammatory treatment for mPCa patients.


  Conclusions Top


We found that the AGR had significant prognostic value for mPCa patients; however, there were some limitations. First, specific inflammatory markers, such as CRP and cytokine levels, were not included in the study. Second, prospective and multi-institutional studies are needed to confirm our results, since the present study was a retrospective analysis that only included a small number of patients.


  Author Contributions Top


NW designed and conducted this study and drafted the manuscript. JYL and XL participated in the design of the study. MHD and ZL collected patient data. JT, KY, and YCZ performed the statistical analysis. LYH supervised the research and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


  Competing Interests Top


All authors declared no competing interests.


  Acknowledgments Top


This study was supported by grants from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (Grant No. 2017zzts903).

Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Asian Journal of Andrology website.



 
  References Top

1.
Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014; 64: 9–29.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66: 115–32.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ito K. Prostate cancer in Asian men. Nat Rev Urol 2014; 11: 197–212.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Baade PD, Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Dunn J, Gardiner RA. Epidemiology of prostate cancer in the Asia-Pacific region. Prostate Int 2013; 1: 47–58.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Baade PD, Youlden DR, Krnjacki LJ. International epidemiology of prostate cancer: geographical distribution and secular trends. Mol Nutr Food Res 2009; 53: 171–84.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Qu YY, Dai B, Kong YY, Ye DW, Yao XD, et al. Prognostic factors in Chinese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Asian J Androl 2013; 15: 110–5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 467–79.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Klotz L, Schellhammer P, Carroll K. A re-assessment of the role of combined androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int 2004; 93: 1177–82.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Moul JW. Twenty years of controversy surrounding combined androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer. Cancer 2009; 115: 3376–8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Verhagen PC, Tilanus MG, de Weger RA, van Moorselaar RJ, van den Tweel JG, et al. Prognostic factors in localised prostate cancer with emphasis on the application of molecular techniques. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 363–71.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis 2009; 30: 1073–81.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144: 646–74.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Vasto S, Carruba G, Candore G, Italiano E, Di Bona D, et al. Inflammation and prostate cancer. Future Oncol 2008; 4: 637–45.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 2010; 140: 883–99.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Verhoven B, Yan Y, Ritter M, Khor LY, Hammond E, et al. Ki-67 is an independent predictor of metastasis and cause-specific mortality for prostate cancer patients treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94-08. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 86: 317–23.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kudahetti S, Fisher G, Ambroisine L, Foster C, Reuter V, et al. p53 immunochemistry is an independent prognostic marker for outcome in conservatively treated prostate cancer. BJU Int 2009; 104: 20–4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Vergis R, Corbishley CM, Thomas K, Horwich A, Huddart R, et al. Expression of Bcl-2, p53, and MDM2 in localized prostate cancer with respect to the outcome of radical radiotherapy dose escalation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 78: 35–41.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Eiro N, Bermudez-Fernandez S, Fernandez-Garcia B, Atienza S, Beridze N, et al. Analysis of the expression of interleukins, interferon beta, and nuclear factor-kappa B in prostate cancer and their relationship with biochemical recurrence. J Immunother 2014; 37: 366–73.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
McMillan DC, Watson WS, O'Gorman P, Preston T, Scott HR, et al. Albumin concentrations are primarily determined by the body cell mass and the systemic inflammatory response in cancer patients with weight loss. Nutr Cancer 2001; 39: 210–3.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Gupta D, Lis CG. Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr J 2010; 9: 69.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Asher V, Lee J, Bali A. Preoperative serum albumin is an independent prognostic predictor of survival in ovarian cancer. Med Oncol 2012; 29: 2005–9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Shafique K, Proctor MJ, McMillan DC, Leung H, Smith K, et al. The modified Glasgow prognostic score in prostate cancer: results from a retrospective clinical series of 744 patients. BMC Cancer 2013; 13: 292.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Azab BN, Bhatt VR, Vonfrolio S, Bachir R, Rubinshteyn V, et al. Value of the pretreatment albumin to globulin ratio in predicting long-term mortality in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 2013; 206: 764–70.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Azab B, Kedia S, Shah N, Vonfrolio S, Lu W, et al. The value of the pretreatment albumin/globulin ratio in predicting the long-term survival in colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28: 1629–36.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Yao Y, Zhao M, Yuan D, Gu X, Liu H, et al. Elevated pretreatment serum globulin albumin ratio predicts poor prognosis for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Thorac Dis 2014; 6: 1261–70.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Du XJ, Tang LL, Mao YP, Sun Y, Zeng MS, et al. The pretreatment albumin to globulin ratio has predictive value for long-term mortality in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One 2014; 9: e94473.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Laky B, Janda M, Cleghorn G, Obermair A. Comparison of different nutritional assessments and body-composition measurements in detecting malnutrition among gynecologic cancer patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87: 1678–85.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Gibbs J, Cull W, Henderson W, Daley J, Hur K, et al. Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity: results from the National VA Surgical Risk Study. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 36–42.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Liu J, Dai Y, Zhou F, Long Z, Li Y, et al. The prognostic role of preoperative serum albumin/globulin ratio in patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2016; 34: 484.e1–e8.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Barbosa-Silva MC. Subjective and objective nutritional assessment methods: what do they really assess? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2008; 11: 248–54.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Myron Johnson A, Merlini G, Sheldon J, Ichihara K. Clinical indications for plasma protein assays: transthyretin (prealbumin) in inflammation and malnutrition. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007; 45: 419–26.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Barber MD, Ross JA, Fearon KC. Changes in nutritional, functional, and inflammatory markers in advanced pancreatic cancer. Nutr Cancer 1999; 35: 106–10.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Brenner DA, Buck M, Feitelberg SP, Chojkier M. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibits albumin gene expression in a murine model of cachexia. J Clin Invest 1990; 85: 248–55.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Ballow M. Mechanisms of action of intravenous immune serum globulin in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 100: 151–7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Nakashima J, Kikuchi E, Miyajima A, Nakagawa K, Oya M, et al. Simple stratification of survival using bone scan and serum C-reactive protein in prostate cancer patients with metastases. Urol Int 2008; 80: 129–33.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Codina Cazador A, Salva Lacombe JA, Fernandez-Llamazares Rodriguez J, Ruiz Feliu B, Codina Barreras A, et al. [Immunoglobulins and the complement system in colorectal cancer]. Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig 1989; 75: 143–8.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Cohen MH, Makuch R, Johnston-Early A, Ihde DC, Bunn PA Jr., et al. Laboratory parameters as an alternative to performance status in prognostic stratification of patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 1981; 65: 187–95.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Adly L, Hill D, Sherman ME, Sturgeon SR, Fears T, et al. Serum concentrations of estrogens, sex hormone-binding globulin, and androgens and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer 2006; 119: 2402–7.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Sawada N, Iwasaki M, Inoue M, Sasazuki S, Yamaji T, et al. Plasma testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations and the risk of prostate cancer among Japanese men: a nested case-control study. Cancer Sci 2010; 101: 2652–7.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Lee S, Choe JW, Kim HK, Sung J. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and cancer. J Epidemiol 2011; 21: 161–8.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet 2001; 357: 539–45.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature 2002; 420: 860–7.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Hara M, Matsuzaki Y, Shimuzu T, Tomita M, Ayabe T, et al. Preoperative serum C-reactive protein level in non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 2007; 27: 3001–4.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Zhou T, He X, Fang W, Zhan J, Hong S, et al. Pretreatment albumin/globulin ratio predicts the prognosis for small-cell lung cancer. Medicine 2016; 95: e3097.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Mao MJ, Wei XL, Sheng H, Wang XP, Li XH, et al. Clinical significance of preoperative albumin and globulin ratio in patients with gastric cancer undergoing treatment. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 3083267.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Almasi CE, Brasso K, Iversen P, Pappot H, Hoyer-Hansen G, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of intact and cleaved forms of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate 2011; 71: 899–907.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Resel Folkersma L, San Jose Manso L, Galante Romo I, Moreno Sierra J, Olivier Gomez C. Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cell count in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Urology 2012; 80: 1328–32.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Daugherty SE, Pfeiffer RM, Sigurdson AJ, Hayes RB, Leitzmann M, et al. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and bladder cancer: a pooled analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173: 721–30.  Back to cited text no. 48
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Impact of nutritional status on the prognosis of patients with metastatic hormone-nave prostate cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan
Teppei Okamoto,Shingo Hatakeyama,Shintaro Narita,Masahiro Takahashi,Toshihiko Sakurai,Sadafumi Kawamura,Senji Hoshi,Masanori Ishida,Toshiaki Kawaguchi,Shigeto Ishidoya,Jiro Shimoda,Hiromi Sato,Koji Mitsuzuka,Tatsuo Tochigi,Norihiko Tsuchiya,Yoichi Arai,Tomonori Habuchi,Chikara Ohyama
World Journal of Urology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Author Contributions
Competing Interests
Acknowledgments
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1387    
    Printed137    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded188    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]