Table of Contents  
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 626-628

Unpaired sex chromosomes in metaphase I human spermatocytes locally modify autosomal bivalents positioning


1 Genetics of Male Fertility Group, Unitat de Biologia Cel·lular, Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Facultat de Biociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès) 08193, Spain
2 Servei d'Estadística Aplicada, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès) 08193, Spain

Date of Submission24-Dec-2017
Date of Acceptance18-Apr-2018
Date of Web Publication26-Jun-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Zaida Sarrate
Genetics of Male Fertility Group, Unitat de Biologia Cel·lular, Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Facultat de Biociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès) 08193, Spain

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_45_18

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mayans C, Blanco J, Valero O, Vidal F, Sarrate Z. Unpaired sex chromosomes in metaphase I human spermatocytes locally modify autosomal bivalents positioning. Asian J Androl 2018;20:626-8

How to cite this URL:
Mayans C, Blanco J, Valero O, Vidal F, Sarrate Z. Unpaired sex chromosomes in metaphase I human spermatocytes locally modify autosomal bivalents positioning. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 May 22];20:626-8. Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2018/20/6/626/235331 - DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_45_18



Dear Editor,

In interphase nuclei, chromosomes occupy specific localizations called chromosome territories (CTs). Distribution of CTs has been related to chromosome size and gene density and is known to influence gene expression.[1] This pattern of organization appears to be a widespread nuclear feature, both in somatic and germ cells.

In spermatogenic cells, we have previously revealed a somatic-like distribution of bivalents at metaphase I (MI) with a nonrandom bivalent disposition and a preferential association between bivalents according to chromosome size, morphology, and gene density.[2] Other studies have revealed preferential proximity of chromosomes 15 and 22 to the sex-chromosomes bivalent in MI.[3] Moreover, a nonrandom chromosome distribution has also been reported in sperm nuclei.[4] Although the functionality of CTs in male germ cells is not fully understood, it has been proposed that it has a role in the regulation of gene expression during spermatogenesis and early embryo development.[5] Accordingly, alterations in CTs in germ cells could have implications for genome regulation leading to male infertility. Our research group has provided the first evidence of alteration in CTs in the presence of Robertsonian translocations (rob) in MI human spermatocytes.[6] The impaired fertility in rob carriers is mainly due to the production of chromosomally abnormal spermatozoa because of the regular segregation of the chromosomes involved in the reorganization and the occurrence of interchromosomal effects.[7] However, we have also revealed in rob carriers that, the trivalent configuration of the reorganized chromosomes disturbs the overall chromosome positioning at MI.[6] Thus, the disruption of MI CTs could be an additional contributory factor to infertility associated with this kind of chromosomal reorganization.[6]

Interestingly, in human spermatogenesis, the XY chromosomes organize in the sex vesicle at prophase I,[8] and in the postmeiotic sex chromatin (PMSC) body in spermatids.[9] In terms of gene expression and CTs organization, sex chromosomes configure a silent compartment where chromosomes appear inactivated from the pachytene stage to round spermatids. Furthermore, it has been reported that sex-chromosome univalency is relatively common in human MI spermatocytes (from infertile males).[10] The pairing features of these chromosomes (restricted to the short pseudoautosomal regions) promote the presence of univalents and explain the high incidence of sex-chromosome aneuploidies in human spermatozoa from infertile patients.[11] Nevertheless, the influence of univalency in the territorial organization of human spermatocytes has not been ascertained.

In this study, we have determined the effect of the presence of sex-chromosome univalents on the territorial organization of MI human spermatocytes from infertile patients with a normal somatic karyotype (46, XY).

Chromosome proximity analysis was performed in a total of 1944 chromosome units from 81 MI,24, X, Y(MI bearing the X and Y chromosomes as univalents). MI spermatocytes were obtained from testicular biopsies from twenty-six 46, XY infertile men (range 1–10 MI per individual). Biopsies were obtained for diagnostic purposes to evaluate the incidence of meiotic chromosomal abnormalities in spermatocytes at MI,[10] and surplus material was used for this study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the collaborating centers (Centre de Reproducció Assistida Fecunmed, Fundació Puigvert, Institut Marquès, Institut Universitari Dexeus and Instituto de Reproducción CEFER). In every instance, all of the patients signed their informed consent about participation in the study and the centers provided all data while preserving patient anonymity.

Testicular biopsies were mechanically disaggregated, and cell suspensions were fixed and dropped onto dry slides.[10] Chromosome preparations were processed following a protocol that combine Leishman staining (PanReac AppliChem, Castellar del Vallès, Spain) and multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH, Spectra Vysion™ Assay Protocol, Vysis Inc., Downers Grove, IL, USA) procedures [Figure 1].[10] Briefly, MI images from Leishman-stained slides were captured and coordinates were noted. Slides were further processed for M-FISH analysis, which enabled unequivocal chromosome identification based on a distinctive color pattern. MI cells were re-located and re-analyzed after the FISH procedure.
Figure 1: MI in (a) Leishman staining and (b) M-FISH with (c) the corresponding M-FISH karyotype. (a and b) Identification of the bivalents that constitute the first ring around the bivalent 14 (indicated with an arrowhead): 4; 7; 13; 15; 16. MI: metaphase I; M-FISH: multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Click here to view


Proximity analysis was performed as it has been previously described.[2] Briefly, in each cell, nearby chromosome units (including bivalents and univalents) were determined for each unit contrasting the images obtained after the M-FISH protocol with those previously captured after Leishman staining. We considered nearby units to be those forming the first ring around the scored unit [Figure 1]. For each MI, 276 proximity relationships are theoretically possible; from 24 chromosome units, there are C(24, 2) = 1/2 × 24 × 23 = 276 combinations of two without repetitions. Nearby units were scored as “1” and the absence of proximity as “0.” A table of proximity was constructed dividing, for each pair of chromosomes, the number of proximities between the number of metaphases. With the aim to summarize proximities between chromosome units, a multidimensional scaling analysis was performed. Data obtained in this analysis was used in a hierarchical cluster analysis. Results were graphically presented in a tree dendrogram, and the number of clusters was determined using the cubic clustering criterion.[12] Furthermore, the concordance between the clusters obtained in MI,24, X, Y and the model of territoriality reported in MI,23, XY[2] was evaluated by Cohen's kappa coefficient. The concordance was assessed taking into account the percentage of chromosome units which remained in the same cluster and those that changed. Finally, Poisson regression models were used to compare the proximities between representative groups of bivalents according to size, morphology, gene density, and the presence of heterochromatic blocks (see detailed groups in Vergés et al.[2]). The number of metaphases observed per individual was considered as an offset term of the model, and the presence of overdispersion was also taken into consideration. The level of statistical significance was set to 0.05.

The comparison between the clusterization of MI,24, X, Y and MI,23, XY enabled a similarity categorization of “substantial”, with a kappa index of 0.647 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.419–0.875). The cluster formed by the largest chromosomes (bivalents 1 to 12) was conserved between MI,24, X, Y and MI,23, XY [Figure 2]. In contrast, the remaining clusters were the result of the regrouping of chromosomal units that formed separated clusters in MI,23, XY [Figure 1]. In cluster 2, an association between acrocentric chromosomes (13; 14; 15; 21; 22) and the Y chromosome was observed [Figure 1]. Cluster 4 only contained the X chromosome, indicating that this chromosome had a heterogeneous proximity relationship with the remaining bivalents [Figure 1]. The analysis of data according to the representative groups of bivalents in terms of size, morphology, gene density, and the presence of heterochromatic blocks revealed statistically significant nearby locations of acrocentric (P = 0.019) and small-size bivalents (P = 0.030), in agreement with previous results from MI,23, XY cells.[2] In contrast, the organization of bivalents based on gene density and large chromosomal size, which were reported in MI,23, XY,[2] was lost in the presence of sex-chromosome univalents.
Figure 2: Tree diagram of chromosome units proximities. (a) Dendrogram for MI,23,XY.[2] (b) Dendrogram for MI,24,X,Y. The color code indicates the groups of chromosomes obtained in the cluster analysis of MI,23,XY. Blue: cluster I; Red: cluster II; Green: cluster III; MI: metaphase I.

Click here to view


Overall, the results suggest that the territorial organization of chromosomes in MI is partially modified by the presence of sex-chromosome univalents. It is important to remark that the X chromosome showed a heterogeneous distribution, while the Y chromosome preserved association with the acrocentric chromosomes. This association could be explained by the homology between the heterochromatic regions of the Y and the acrocentric chromosomes,[13] which would promote heterologous pairing at prophase I that could be maintained at least until the MI stage. Indirect evidence that supports the association observed between the Y chromosome and acrocentric chromosomes is that 70% of de novo reciprocal translocations involving the Y chromosome and any autosome are produced between the heterochromatin Yq and the short arm of an acrocentric chromosome.[14] Moreover, since acrocentric chromosomes form a specific cluster at meiosis I, it could be interpreted as a facilitating factor for the formation of de novo rob, which are the most common recurrent structural reorganizations in humans.[15]

It cannot be ignored that sex chromosomes show distinctive characteristics about size, morphology, and gene density. It has been reported that these characteristics influence bivalent positioning in MI,[2] and therefore, it is not surprising that the presence of unpaired X and Y chromosomes will promote some alterations in the proximity relationship among other chromosomes.

We should like to note that the most likely destiny of a spermatocyte with univalents would be its elimination due to the activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint. Moreover, X and Y chromosome univalences could also disturb processes of sex chromosome inactivation and compromise meiotic progression throughout alteration of gene expression. Nevertheless, inefficiencies in cell cycle checkpoint could be inferred through the high incidences of sex-chromosome aneuploidies that have been widely described in spermatozoa from infertile males.[11] Thus, it could be envisaged that some spermatocytes displaying sex-chromosome univalents and alterations on CTs will progress along spermatogenesis resulting in genetically abnormal spermatozoa that would compromise the fertility of the individual.


  Author Contributions Top


JB and ZS conceived, designed and coordinated the study. CM and ZS carried out the experimental procedures. OV performed the statistical analysis. CM, JB, FV, and ZS were involved in data analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


  Competing Interests Top


All authors declare no competing interests.


  Acknowledgments Top


This study was supported by the Project 2017SGR-503 (Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain), Project CF-180034 (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain) and Project SAF2016-77165-P (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain). The authors thank the Centre de Reproducció Assistida Fecunmed, Fundació Puigvert, Institut Marquès, Institut Universitari Dexeus and Instituto de Reproducción CEFER for providing biological samples of the patients analyzed. We also thank the Statistical Service of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona for its support in the statistical treatment of the results.



 
  References Top

1.
Cremer T, Cremer M. Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2: 1–22.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Vergés L, Blanco J, Valero O, Vidal F, Sarrate Z. Chromosome size, morphology, and gene density determine bivalent positioning in metaphase I human spermatocytes. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 818–24.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sarrate Z, Blanco J, Vidal F. Acrocentric bivalents positioned preferentially nearby to the XY pair in metaphase I human spermatocytes. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 1241–5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Zalenskaya IA, Zalensky AO. Non-random positioning of chromosomes in human sperm nuclei. Chromosom Res 2004; 12: 163–73.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Marshall WF. Gene expression and nuclear architecture during development and differentiation. Mech Dev 2003; 120: 1217–30.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Solé M, Blanco J, Valero O, Vergés L, Vidal F, et al. Altered bivalent positioning in metaphase I human spermatocytes from Robertsonian translocation carriers. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016; 34: 131–8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Godo A, Blanco J, Vidal F, Sandalinas M, Garcia-Guixé E, et al. Altered segregation pattern and numerical chromosome abnormalities interrelate in spermatozoa from Robertsonian translocation carriers. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 31: 79–88.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Vries M, Vosters S, Merkx G, D'Hauwers K, Wansink DG, et al. Human male meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. PLoS One 2012; 7: e31485.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Sin HS, Ichijima Y, Koh E, Namiki M, Namekawa SH. Namekawa human postmeiotic sex chromatin and its impact on sex chromosome evolution. Genome Res 2012; 22: 827–36.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Sarrate Z, Vidal F, Blanco J. Meiotic abnormalities in metaphase I human spermatocytes from infertile males: frequencies, chromosomes involved, and the relationships with polymorphic karyotype and seminal parameters. Asian J Androl 2014; 16: 838–44.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Sarrate Z, Vidal F, Blanco J. Role of sperm fluorescent in situ hybridization studies in infertile patients: indications, study approach, and clinical relevance. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 1892–902.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ward JH Jr. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 1963; 58: 236–44.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Codina-Pascual M, Navarro J, Oliver-Bonet M, Kraus J, Speicher MR, et al. Behaviour of human heterochromatic regions during the synapsis of homologous chromosomes. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1490–7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gardner RJ, Sutherland GR. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004. p115.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Bandyopadhyay R, Heller A, Knox-DuBois C, McCaskill C, Berend SA, et al. Parental origin and timing of de novo Robertsonian translocation formation. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 71: 1456–62.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Chromosome positioning and male infertility: it comes with the territory
Zaida Sarrate,Mireia Solé,Francesca Vidal,Ester Anton,Joan Blanco
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Author Contributions
Competing Interests
Acknowledgments
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed877    
    Printed117    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded148    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]