Table of Contents  
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 523-524

Results of intrauterine inseminations with two pooled sequential ejaculates in cases of oligozoospermia


1 Department of Reproductive Medicine, Toulouse University Hospital, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne (Great Britain Avenue), 31059 Toulouse, France
2 EA 3694 Human Fertility Research Group, Toulouse University Hospital, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne (Great Britain Avenue), 31059 Toulouse, France

Date of Submission02-Oct-2017
Date of Acceptance26-Feb-2018
Date of Web Publication24-Apr-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jean Parinaud
Department of Reproductive Medicine, Toulouse University Hospital, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne (Great Britain Avenue), 31059 Toulouse, France; EA 3694 Human Fertility Research Group, Toulouse University Hospital, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne (Great Britain Avenue), 31059 Toulouse, France

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_22_18

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Moreau J, Gatimel N, Parinaud J, Leandri R. Results of intrauterine inseminations with two pooled sequential ejaculates in cases of oligozoospermia. Asian J Androl 2018;20:523-4

How to cite this URL:
Moreau J, Gatimel N, Parinaud J, Leandri R. Results of intrauterine inseminations with two pooled sequential ejaculates in cases of oligozoospermia. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 20];20:523-4. Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2018/20/5/523/230879 - DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_22_18



Dear Editor,

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is mainly indicated in cases of unexplained or mild male subfertility. In these cases, gonadotropin ovarian stimulation combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist IUI leads to up to an 18% delivery rate per attempt.[1] However, when the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated is lower than 1 × 106, the success rate drops below 5%.[1] Since semen quality varies intra-individually, this threshold may not be reached on the day of IUI. In such cases, some authors have suggested asking men to provide two consecutive ejaculates and to perform IUI with the pooled spermatozoa.[2] However, the effectiveness of IUI with pooled ejaculates is not clear.[3]

To address that question, 2162 consecutive IUI procedures performed on 869 couples at the Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France, from January 1, 2012, to May 1, 2017, were analyzed retrospectively. Couples were considered eligible for IUI when at least one fallopian tube was proven permeable and the total motile sperm count (TMSC) was above 1 million after a diagnostic sperm selection test. This test was performed according to the WHO guidelines (2010)[4] using discontinuous density gradient centrifugation (three layers: 60%, 80%, and 90% with Puresperm®, Nidacon, Mölndal, Sweden). Ovarian stimulations were conducted as previously described.[5] For IUI, spermatozoa were selected in the same way as in the sperm selection test. If the TMSC was <10[6] after selection, a second ejaculate was requested 1 h or 2 h later. The two sperm preparations were then pooled for insemination. Clinical pregnancies were defined as the presence of a fetal heartbeat 7 weeks after insemination.

Data were extracted from the Gynelog clinical database used in our department. This database is approved by the French National Commission for Information Technology and Civil Liberties (CNIL) to be used for clinical research. According to French law (2012-300), patients are aware that their data can be used for anonymous clinical studies unless they specifically state otherwise. This information is detailed in posters in the rooms of the center, and patients can inform the center through a letter if they do not want to participate in clinical studies. Statistical analyses were performed with StatView software (Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (s.d.). Percentageswere compared with the Chi-square test and means withStudent's t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test depending on the normality of the data distribution.

Results are presented in [Table 1]. Double ejaculates were necessary in 4.4% of IUI, mainly in cases of male subfertility. All basic semen parameter values were significantly lower at the time of diagnostic test selection in the cases with two sperm collections ([Table 1]). The threshold of 106 spermatozoa was obtained by pooling a second ejaculate in 82.3% (79/96) of the cases. Compared with IUI with one ejaculate (n = 2066), the clinical pregnancy rate per IUI was not lower when two ejaculates were needed (n = 96) although the number of inseminated motile spermatozoa was significantly lower. In the 17 cases where the threshold of 106 spermatozoa was not obtained after pooling the two ejaculates, no clinical pregnancy was obtained.
Table 1: Patient characteristics, basic sperm parameters, and intrauterine insemination results based on the number of sperm collections per attempt

Click here to view


The results of this retrospective study show that compared with single-ejaculate IUI, equivalent clinical pregnancy rates are obtained when two ejaculates are pooled to compensate for an insufficient number of motile spermatozoa being available for insemination from the first ejaculate. In the early 1990s, Tur-Kaspa et al.[2] showed that pooling two ejaculates increased the number of motile spermatozoa up to 329% in oligozoospermic men. Recently, Bahadur et al.[6] reported that sperm concentration and progressive motility were higher in a second ejaculate collected <1 h after thefirst one. Barash et al.[7] also reported a higher fertilization rate in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with the second ejaculate. Based on these literature data, we hypothesize that the similar pregnancy rate in the group needing two sperm samples can be attributed to the second sperm collection. An argument for this, although in a limited number of cases, is the decreased pregnancy rate observed when the threshold of 106 was not reached after pooling two semen samples. In another study, Kucuk et al.[3] randomized couples, whose TMSC after preparation was between 1 × 106 and 5 × 106, either with or without collection of a second ejaculate. Although the number of inseminated motile spermatozoa was significantly higher in the two-ejaculate group (7.35 × 106 ± 1.01 × 106vs 3.99 × 106 ± 0.72 × 106; P< 0.001), the pregnancy rate did not increase significantly (6/39 vs 5/50; P = 0.444). However, the number of patients studied was too low to draw any conclusions and their thresholds for a second ejaculate (fewer than 5 × 106 spermatozoa) were higher than that in our study (fewer than 1 × 106) or reported in other studies that separated good and bad results in IUI.[1]

Regarding the number of inseminated spermatozoa, a recent systematic review found that the value of 1 × 106 spermatozoa is the most frequently cited threshold for optimizing IUI results in retrospective studies.[8] Is this threshold influenced by the number of sperm collections needed to reach it? This question could be answered in a randomized controlled trial. But in our opinion, such a trial would be questionable ethically based on evidence from retrospective studies that have led, for example, the French Good Practices Laboratory for IUI to ask for a minimum of 1 × 106 spermatozoa to be inseminated. Our data suggest that the threshold of 1 × 106 inseminated spermatozoa is still valid, despite the need for two sperm collections. The practice of pooling two ejaculates could eventually allow some couples to avoid being prematurely referred to IVF although it may depend on the IUI rank and on the frequency at which two sperm samples are needed. Further studies are needed to test this hypothesis.


  Author Contributions Top


JM participated in the design of the study, analysis of the results, carrying out IU, and writing the manuscript. NG participated in carrying out IU and writing the manuscript. JP contributed to the design of the study, statistical analyses, carrying out IU, and writing the manuscript. RL contributed to carrying out IU and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


  Competing Interests Top


All authors declare no competing interests.



 
  References Top

1.
Monraisin O, Chansel-Debordeaux L, Chiron A, Floret S, Cens S, et al. Evaluation of intrauterine insemination practices: a 1-year prospective study in seven French assisted reproduction technology centers. Fertil Steril 2016; 105: 1589–93.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Tur-Kaspa I, Dudkiewicz A, Confino E, Gleicher N. Pooled sequential ejaculates: a way to increase the total number of motile sperm from oligozoospermic men. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 906–9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kucuk T, Sozen E, Buluc B. Intrauterine insemination with double ejaculate compared with single ejaculate in male factor infertility: a pilot study. J Androl 2008; 29: 404–7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction. 5th ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cochet T, Gatimel N, Moreau J, Cohade C, Fajau C, et al. Effect of unilateral tubal abnormalities on the results of intrauterine inseminations. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35: 314–7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bahadur G, Almossawi O, Zeirideen Zaid R, Ilahibuccus A, Al-Habib A, et al. Semen characteristics in consecutive ejaculates with short abstinence in subfertile males. Reprod Biomed Online 2016; 32: 323–8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Barash A, Lurie S, Weissman A, Insler V. Comparison of sperm parameters, in vitro fertilization results, and subsequent pregnancy rates using sequential ejaculates, collected two hours apart, from oligoasthenozoospermic men. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 1008–11.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ombelet W, Dhont N, Thijssen A, Bosmans E, Kruger T. Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 28: 300–9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Author Contributions
Competing Interests
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed769    
    Printed54    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded89    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]