Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 360-365

Chronic epididymitis and Grade III varicocele and their associations with semen characteristics in men consulting for couple infertility


1 Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Rosario, Rosario 2000, Argentina
2 University of Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), UMR_S 1085, Rennes F-35000, France

Date of Submission17-Jul-2017
Date of Acceptance07-Dec-2017
Date of Web Publication06-Mar-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Luc Multigner
University of Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), UMR_S 1085, Rennes F-35000, France

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_78_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Chronic epididymitis and varicocele are frequently observed genital disorders in men consulting for couple infertility, but their impact on semen characteristics at the time of infertility consultation is still a matter of debate. We investigated 652 male partners of couples who had their first infertility consultation between 1999 and 2015 in Argentina. Men with chronic epididymitis (n = 253), Grade III varicocele (n = 106), and both conditions (n = 125) were compared with a control group (n = 168) composed of men without these disorders or any other recognized causes of male infertility. We showed that men who presented isolated chronic epididymitis were more likely to have high percentages of low sperm motility and abnormal sperm morphology as well as a high number of white blood cells. Men with isolated Grade III varicocele had low sperm production and motility and an increased percentage of abnormal sperm morphology. Finally, men who simultaneously presented chronic epididymitis with Grade III varicocele had a low sperm motility and increased percentage of abnormal sperm morphology as well as a high number of white blood cells. Physical examination of the genital organs may identify common disorders, potentially involved as causal factors of patient's infertility. These disorders are associated with specific seminal profiles that should help in identifying the best treatment from the available therapeutic options, effectiveness, safety, and allowing as much as possible natural conception.

Keywords: couple subfertility; epididymitis; male factor infertility; semen quality; varicocele


How to cite this article:
Oliva A, Multigner L. Chronic epididymitis and Grade III varicocele and their associations with semen characteristics in men consulting for couple infertility. Asian J Androl 2018;20:360-5

How to cite this URL:
Oliva A, Multigner L. Chronic epididymitis and Grade III varicocele and their associations with semen characteristics in men consulting for couple infertility. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Jul 17];20:360-5. Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2018/20/4/360/226730 - DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_78_17




  Introduction Top


Male factors are involved in at least half of the couples who consult for infertility.[1],[2] Knowledge of the causes of infertility and their pathophysiological basis is essential for proposing specific and effective treatments in an adequate cost-benefit ratio.[3]

Semen analysis is the cornerstone of investigation for male infertility, although it has inherent limitations.[4],[5] It is routinely used to classify sperm parameters according to comprehensive descriptive categories (normozoospermia, azoospermia, oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, and teratozoospermia). While seminal analysis is highly informative in characterizing the fertility status of men, it is of limited relevance in identifying causal factors of patient's infertility.[6]

Topographic localization of the cause is the first principle of identification and classification of disorders of male infertility.[7] In this regard, physical examination, particularly visual inspection and palpation of the external male genital organs, is invaluable for identifying etiological factors and their nature.[8] Thereafter, linking such disorders to seminal characteristics may help in the understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and to guide the appropriate conduct for the patient.

Abnormal palpations of the extratesticular excurrent ducts, epididymis, and vas deferens, as well as of the veins within the scrotum, are frequent genital signs not only in urological consultations, but also in men consulting for infertility.[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14] At the time of infertility consultations, these genital signs are usually asymptomatic and suggest the presence of chronic epididymitis and varicocele. Even if there is some clinical and pathological evidence linking these disorders to infertility, changes in the affected seminal variables remain poorly studied and controversial.

Chronic epididymitis is an inflammatory condition that is frequently related to past events, such as bacterial or viral invasion or testicular trauma.[15],[16] Few studies, most of them based on a limited number of patients, have suggested that these disorders may affect sperm cell characteristics, such as number, motility, or morphology,[15],[17] but a clear picture is still lacking. In addition, a high number of white blood cells (WBCs) in the semen have been reported and interpreted as a local immunological response.[18]

Varicocele is characterized by an abnormal enlargement of the pampiniform venous plexus in the scrotum. Considering the predominance of the left-side varicocele, most etiological hypotheses have their origin in the unique anatomy of the left testicular vein.[19],[20] Studies on the effects of varicocele on seminal characteristics have resulted in conflicting conclusions, despite evidence that varicocele affects testicular function, and several mechanistic hypotheses have been proposed.[13],[21] This may be partially due to the clinical heterogeneity of varicocele, resulting in different effects on seminal characteristics.[21] It is now recognized that only Grade III varicoceles may significantly affect semen quality,[22],[23] which are those that are visible and palpable at physical examination and that significantly affect the diameter and reflux of blood in the largest vein in the pampiniform plexus.

Here, we aimed to evaluate the relationships between frequent genital disorders, mostly asymptomatic, initially revealed by physical examination, namely chronic epididymitis and Grade III varicocele, and semen characteristics in male partners from couples having their first infertility consultation in Argentina. We also reported for the first time the semen profile of men who simultaneously presented with epididymitis and a Grade III varicocele at the time of consultation.


  Patients and Methods Top


Study area and population study

This cross-sectional study took place in the Santa Fe and Entre Rios provinces in Argentina among couples attending the Andrology Unit of one of the four medical institutions in Argentina (Orono Group, Rosario; Garibaldi Italian Hospital, Rosario; Urology Center, Santa Fe; and Adventist Clinic of the Plata, Libertador General San Martin) between June 1999 and June 2015. The initial study population comprised 966 male partners from consecutive couples seeking advice after failure to establish a pregnancy during one year or more of unprotected intercourse. We only considered couples for which the male partner did not have an episode of fever or had taken medications (antibiotics and psychotherapeutic drugs) during the previous 3 months.

Information was collected at several stages. A structured interview was conducted during the first visit to obtain information on the basic demographic, medical, surgical, and reproductive history, past and recent illnesses and treatment, and lifestyle. A semen evaluation that included two semen analyses at an interval of 2–4 weeks was then ordered. The first semen analysis included a semen culture that routinely comprised the search for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Semen analyses were conducted in the corresponding laboratories of each medical institution. During the second visit, which took place a few weeks after the second semen analysis, a complete physical and andrological examination was carried out.

Physical examination

All men were examined in both supine and standing positions by one physician (AO). The examination in the supine position included visual examination of the penis, urethral meatus position, pubic hair distribution, and scrotum, and palpation and comparison of the testis, epididymis, and vas deferens. The spermatic venous plexus was carefully examined by palpation, with and without the Valsalva maneuver, with the patients in both the supine and standing positions. Testicular volume was assessed using a Prader orchidometer (Pro-Health Product Ltd., Guangzhou, China) which provides measurements closely related to those obtained by ultrasounds.[24]

We defined chronic epididymitis in those patients who presented any indurations, irregularities, or thickening, and that reported a past event of scrotal pain episode related to genital infection or trauma. Ambiguous cases of abnormal palpation of the epididymis or vas deferens or when patients did not report past events were confirmed by direct ultrasound (Toshiba Aplio 300, Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan).[24],[25] Direct ultrasound allows the detection of any modifications in diameter, texture, vascularization, cysts, and calcifications, and their localization in the head, tail, proximal vas deferens, or vas deferens ampulla.[24] Grade III varicocele was defined as those visible through the scrotal skin and palpable without the Valsalva maneuver. Color Doppler ultrasound (Toshiba Aplio 400, Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation was systematically employed to confirm these clinical varicoceles, as well as ambiguous cases, as recommended by the European Association of Urology.[26]

Semen analysis

Semen analysis was performed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines.[27] Semen samples were obtained by masturbation after a recommended period of 3 to 5-day sexual abstinence. Semen volume was measured in a graduated pipette, accurate to within 0.1 ml. Sperm concentration was determined by Neubauer hemocytometer (Malassez Hemocytometer, DYNAL®, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), after an appropriate dilution. Sperm motility was assessed by direct observation in a microscope (×400, Eclipse E200-LED, Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA). Sperm morphology and semen cytology, including WBCs' identification, were assessed by staining slides (May–Grunwald Giemsa staining, MGG-1048, Casa Álvarez, Madrid, Spain) and direct observation under a microscope (×1000, Nikon Instruments Inc.). WBC identification included the evaluation of lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear cells that can be discriminated from other seminal cells, such as immature sperm cells or epithelial cells. The four laboratories were examined every month using the same internal quality control protocol with frozen semen in straws from fertile individuals. Inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 7.0% and 6.0% for sperm concentration, 17.0% and 9.0% for sperm motility, and 14.0% and 8.0% for sperm morphology, respectively.

Data classification

We first excluded 164 men because they did not complete the entire medical procedure, including physical examination and semen analysis. We further excluded 150 men for whom we identified: (a) well-recognized clinical causes of infertility other than those here under study (mostly mal-descended testes, primary or secondary hypogonadism, spermatic cord torsion, confirmed obstruction of the epididymis or vas deferens, absence of the vasa deferentia, or ejaculatory dysfunction); (b) an active genital infection; (c) past treatment that could have influenced the pituitary–gonadal axis or chemotherapy. The final study population comprised 652 men [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Flow chart of the study population selection.

Click here to view


Patients with an abnormal (by palpation) epididymis or vas deferens, confirmed by direct echography (Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation) if necessary (68 of 378 cases of epididymitis included in the final analysis), were considered to have chronic epididymitis, with or without extension to the vas deferens. We grouped chronic epididymitis based on their similar etiological factors and pathophysiology, regardless of their laterality.[28],[29] Patients with color Doppler ultrasound (Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation) – confirmed Grade III varicocele – were grouped regardless of their laterality. We found that some patients simultaneously presented chronic epididymitis and varicocele. Thus, we finally defined four groups: isolated chronic epididymitis group, isolated Grade III varicocele group, combined chronic epididymitis and Grade III varicocele group, and a control group in which patients were without chronic epididymitis or Grade III varicocele [Figure 1].

For sperm parameters, continuous outcomes (as evaluated by the laboratory) were semen volume (ml), sperm concentration (×106 ml−1), total sperm output (×106; the product of seminal volume × sperm concentration), percentage of total motile spermatozoa, percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology, and WBC concentration (×106 ml−1). Semen characteristics were categorized as dichotomous variables according to thresholds based on the WHO guidelines for defining reference limits:[27] semen volume (<2 vs ≥2 ml), sperm concentration (<20 × 106vs ≥20 × 106 ml−1), sperm output (<40 × 106vs ≥40 × 106), sperm motility (<50% vs ≥50%), sperm morphology (<30% vs ≥30%), and WBC concentration (<1 × 106vs ≥1 × 106 ml−1).

We recorded and classified the following information as continuous variables: age (year), weight (kg), height (m), and testicular volume (ml). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight/height[2] (kg m−2) and categorized as normal weight (<25 kg m−2), overweight (≥25 and <30 kg m−2), and obese (≥30 kg m−2). We also recorded the following data: type of fertility (primary, secondary), season of sperm analysis (autumn, winter, spring, and summer), smoking (ever vs never), and alcohol consumption (ever vs never).

Statistical analysis

Comparisons between groups were made with the Chi-squared test for categorized variables and the Student's t-test for continuous variables. In the analyses involving a categorized outcome variable, we used multiple logistic regression analyses to produce odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between semen characteristics and patient categories, adjusted for confounding factors. The control group was always the group of patients without chronic epididymitis and Grade III varicocele. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate potential confounding factors (age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, season of sperm analysis, and type of infertility). Factors were considered to be confounding if their inclusion in the model modified the estimate of the OR by >10%.[30] Age was always included as a confounding factor in the adjusted model. Missing data for covariates (4 for smoking) were addressed by substituting them by a missing value indicator variable. All analyses were performed with the Statview software package (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). All P values were two sided, and considered to be statistically significant if P < 0.05.

Ethical approval

Approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of each institution in Argentina (Orono Group, Rosario; Garibaldi Italian Hospital, Rosario; Urology Center, Santa Fe; and Adventist Clinic of the Plata, Libertador General San Martin). Informed consents were obtained from all patients.


  Results Top


General characteristics of the final study population (n = 625) and patient groups are presented in [Table 1]. The median age was 34 years and did not differ between patient groups. Most patients (90.0%) consulted for primary infertility, but those presenting with isolated chronic epididymitis or isolated Grade III varicocele were more likely to present a secondary infertility than patients without these genital disorders. Nearly 40% (39.1%) of the men were overweight or obese, and this did not differ between groups except for those presenting with isolated chronic epididymitis, in which the prevalence of being overweight and obese was lower. There was a higher proportion of smokers among patients who had Grade III varicocele, whether isolated or combined with chronic epididymitis. Finally, individuals with chronic epididymitis, whether isolated or combined with Grade III varicocele, tended to have a higher total testicular volume.
Table 1: General characteristics of the study population

Click here to view


Semen characteristics of the study population are presented in [Table 2]. Dichotomized-dependent variables were used to assess the association between patient categories and seminal characteristics presented as the adjusted OR [Table 3]. The presence of isolated chronic epididymitis was significantly associated with having ≥1 × 106 ml−1 WBCs, <30% morphologically normal sperm cells, and <50% motile sperm cells. Men with isolated Grade III varicocele had a significantly higher risk of having <50% motile sperm cells and <30% morphologically normal sperm cells and a sperm cell output of <40 × 106. Finally, patients with both chronic epididymitis and Grade III varicocele had a significantly higher risk of having <50% motile sperm cells, <30% morphologically normal sperm cells, and a WBC count of ≥1 × 106 ml−1.
Table 2: Semen characteristics of the study population

Click here to view
Table 3: Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the relationship between genital disorders and semen characteristics

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In this study, we investigated the semen profile of men with common genital disorders, such as chronic epididymitis and Grade III varicocele, initially revealed by physical examination of male partners from couples having their first infertility consultation.

Palpation of extratesticular excurrent ducts, as well of the veins within the scrotum, may be difficult to interpret and lead to misclassification. However, all patients included in this study were examined by a single physician, thus eliminating interobserver variability. Direct ultrasound was also used when chronic epididymitis was uncertain, and color Doppler ultrasound was systematically used to confirm Grade III varicocele.

Here, we showed that isolated chronic epididymitis is associated with low sperm motility and a low percentage of morphologically normal sperm cells, as well as an elevated number of WBCs. The presence of a high number (>1 × 106 ml-1) of WBCs is not surprising, as it is a hallmark of inflammation of the extratesticular excurrent ducts.[31] WBCs, particularly lymphoid cells, are activated by many chemical, physical, and biological stimuli. Such factors generate an inflammatory response and cellular reactions that induce the production of antigens, superoxides, complement proteins, neuropeptides, and lipoproteins, resulting in cell degranulation. After activation, inflammatory mediators are released into the semen, including histamine, and many cytokines and chemokines,[32],[33] which are possibly harmful for sperm cell function, inducing the alteration of sperm cell characteristics.[34],[35]

Isolated Grade III varicocele in our study population was associated with low sperm production and motility, as well as reduced percentage of morphologically normal sperm cells, without affecting the number of WBCs. Our observations are consistent with recent reports, showing that patients with Grade III varicocele have low semen quality.[21],[22] Various mechanisms have been hypothesized to be involved, such as high intrascrotal temperature, changes in testicular blood flow and venous pressure, reflux of renal or adrenal metabolic products, hormonal dysfunction, autoimmunity, defects in the acrosome reaction, and oxidative stress.[13] Molecular and genetic studies have provided insights into the causes of low semen quality and altered sperm function in men with varicocele: elevated apoptosis among developing germ cells, which may give rise to low sperm production; high levels of reactive oxygen species, associated with reduced sperm motility; and high concentrations of toxic agents, such as cadmium, in seminal plasma, which may be involved in abnormal sperm morphology.[36]

We identified a group of men who simultaneously presented chronic epididymitis and Grade III varicocele. It is not surprising that such diseases sometimes coexist, given the high frequency of both conditions in infertile men. This association has not been specifically reported and investigated until now, although two studies reported that Grade III varicocele affects the biological function of the epididymis by lowering α-glucosidase (specific epididymis-derived protein) in addition to testicular impairment.[37],[38] These patients combined low sperm cell motility and a high frequency of sperm cells with abnormal morphology,[37],[38] as observed in patients with isolated Grade III varicocele, with a high number of WBCs,[37] as observed in patients with isolated chronic epididymitis. Although alterations in sperm concentration and production were not always statistically significant, this group of patients tends to present the worst semen analysis profile.

By carrying out a physical examination, including visual inspection and palpation of the external male genital organs, we confirmed that chronic epididymitis and Grade III varicocele are common potential etiological factors in male patients consulting for couple infertility. We have shown that these disorders are associated with specific and different semen characteristics depending on whether they are observed in isolation or together relative to patients who do not present these conditions. New studies taking into account the diversity of localization of epididymal lesions combined with the assay of biological markers of epididymal function will be necessary to improve our knowledge on the negative effects on semen characteristics of varicocele and epididymal changes.

Combining a careful physical examination for these etiological factors with a semen analysis would help orientate the practitioner to the best treatment from the available therapeutic options, their effectiveness and safety, and their compatibility with natural conception. This may be particularly important in those countries where a significant proportion of infertile couples cannot access specialized clinics or advanced reproductive technologies for cost reasons.

A variety of drug treatments (e.g., antioxidants, mast cell stabilizers, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents) have been proposed for patients with a high WBC count, resulting in fewer WBCs and improvement of sperm characteristics.[39],[40] In addition to surgery,[37] antioxidants and drugs that act on testicular vascularization have been proposed for varicocele to improve sperm characteristics.[41],[42],[43],[44] In the future, it may be beneficial to explore these drug treatment options in situ ations where Grade III varicocele is associated with epididymitis. In all cases, it is up to the practitioner to decide, considering the effectiveness and safety of the treatment, as well the patient's wishes.


  Author Contributions Top


AO and LM conceived the study design, interpreted the results, were involved in writing the manuscript, and approved the final submitted version. AO acquired clinical and semen data. LM analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.


  Competing Interests Top


Both authors declare no competing interests.



 
  References Top

1.
Mosher WD, Pratt WF. Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends. Fertil Steril 1991; 56: 192–3.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988–1989). Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 811–6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. A prognosis-based approach to infertility: understanding the role of time. Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 2243–8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Björndahl L. What is normal semen quality? On the use and abuse of reference limits for the interpretation of semen analysis results. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2011; 14: 179–86.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wang C, Swerdloff RS. Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 1502–7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Dadhich P, Ramasamy R, Lipshultz LI. The male infertility office visit. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2015; 67: 157–68.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Nieschlag E. Classification of andrological disorders. In: Nieschlag E, Behre HM, editors. Andrology: Male Reproductive Health and Dysfunction. 2nd Edition. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2001. p83–7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Behre HM, Yeung CH, Holstein AF, Weinbauer GF, Gassner P, et al. Diagnosis of male infertility and hypogonadism. In: Nieschlag E, Behre HM, editors. Andrology: Male Reproductive Health and Dysfunction. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2001. p. 89–124.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Schuppe HC, Pilatz A, Hossain H, Meinhardt A, Bergmann M, et al. [Orchitis and male infertility]. Urologe A 2010; 49: 629–35. [Article in German].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Nickel JC. Chronic epididymitis: a practical approach to understanding and managing a difficult urologic enigma. Rev Urol 2003; 5: 209–15.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Awojobi OA, Nkposong EO, Lawani J. Aetiologic factors of male infertility in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci 1983; 12: 91–4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kopa Z, Wenzel J, Papp GK, Haidl G. Role of granulocyte elastase and interleukin-6 in the diagnosis on sperm function. Andrologia 2005; 30: 73–80.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Jarow JP. Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 59–64.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 613–6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Haidl G, Allam JP, Schuppe HC. Chronic epididymitis: impact on semen parameters and therapeutic options. Andrologia 2008; 40: 92–6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Chan PT, Schlegel PN. Inflammatory conditions of the male excurrent ductal system. Part I. J Androl 2002; 23: 453–60.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Rusz A, Pilatz A, Wagenlehner F, Linn T, Diemer T, et al. Influence of urogenital infections and inflammation on semen quality and male fertility. World J Urol 2012; 30: 23–30.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Wolff H. The biologic significance of white blood cells in semen. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 1143–57.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Schoor RA, Elhanbly SM, Niederberger C. The pathophysiology of varicocele-associated male infertility. Curr Urol Rep 2001; 2: 432–6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
De Schepper A. Nutcracker' phenomenon of the renal vein and venous pathology of the left kidney. J Belge Radiol 1972; 55: 507–11.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Naughton CK, Nangia AK, Agarwal A. Varicocele and male infertility. Part II. Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 473–81.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Al-Ali BM, Marszalek M, Shamloul R, Pummer K, Trummer H. Clinical parameters and semen analysis in 716 Austrian patients with varicocele. Urology 2010; 75: 1069–73.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Al-Ali BM, Shamloul R, Pichler M, Augustin H, Pummer K. Clinical and laboratory profiles of a large cohort of patients with different grades of varicocele. Cent European J Urol 2013; 66: 71–4.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Lotti F, Maggi M. Ultrasound of the male genital tract in relation to male reproductive health. Hum Reprod Update 2015; 21: 56–83.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Behre HM, Kliesch S, Schädel F, Nieschlag E. Clinical relevance of scrotal and transrectal ultrasonography in andrological patients. Int J Androl 1995; 18 Suppl 2: 27–31.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Jungwirth A, Giwercman A, Tournaye H, Diemer T, Kopa Z, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on Male Infertility: the 2012 update. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 324–32.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Chan PT, Schlegel PN. Inflammatory conditions of the male excurrent ductal system. Part II. J Androl 2002; 23: 461–9.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Wilson SR, Katz DS. Computed tomography demonstration of epididymitis with extension to vas deferens. Urology 2006; 68: 1339–40.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Grenland S, Rothman KJ, editors. Introduction to stratified analysis. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 253–79.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Anderson DJ. Cell-mediated immunity and inflammatory processes in male infertility. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 1990; 38: 79–86.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Maegawa M, Kamada M, Irahara M, Yamamoto S, Yoshikawa S, et al. A repertoire of cytokines in human seminal plasma.J Reprod Immunol 2002; 54: 33–42.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Sanocka D, Jedrzejczak P, Szumała-Kaekol A, Fraczek M, Kurpisz M. Male genital tract inflammation: the role of selected interleukins in regulation of pro-oxidant and antioxidant enzymatic substances in seminal plasma. J Androl 2003; 24: 448–55.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Sharma RK, Pasqualotto AE, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ Jr., Agarwal A. Relationship between seminal white blood cell counts and oxidative stress in men treated at an infertility clinic. J Androl 2001; 22: 575–83.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Whittington K, Ford WC. Relative contribution of leukocytes and of spermatozoa to reactive oxygen species production in human sperm suspensions. Int J Androl 1999; 22: 229–35.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Marmar JL. The pathophysiology of varicoceles in the light of current molecular and genetic information. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 5: 461–72.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Lehtihet M, Arver S, Kalin B, Kvist U, Pousette A. Left-sided grade 3 varicocele may affect the biological function of the epididymis. Scand J Urol 2014; 48: 284–9.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Vivas-Acevedo G, Lozano-Hernández R, Camejo MI. Varicocele decreases epididymal neutral α-glucosidase and is associated with alteration of nuclear DNA and plasma membrane in spermatozoa. BJU Int 2014; 113: 642–9.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Saharkhiz N, Nikbakht R, Hemadi M. Ketotifen, a mast cell blocker improves sperm motility in asthenospermic infertile men. J Hum Reprod Sci 2013; 1: 19–22.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Oliva A, Multigner L. Ketotifen improves sperm motility and sperm morphology in male patients with leukocytospermia and unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 240–3.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Cavallini G, Biagiotti G, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Vitali G. Medical therapy of oligoasthenospermia associated with left varicocele. BJU Int 2003; 91: 513–8.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Cavallini G, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Biagiotti G, Vitali G. Cinnoxicam and L-carnitine/acetyl-L-carnitine treatment for idiopathic and varicocele-associated oligoasthenospermia. J Androl 2004; 25: 761–70.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Azadi L, Abbasi H, Deemeh MR, Tavalaee M, Arbabian M, et al. Zaditen (Ketotifen), as mast cell blocker, improves sperm quality, chromatin integrity and pregnancy rate after varicocelectomy. Int J Androl 2011; 34: 446–52.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Oliva A, Dotta A, Multigner L. Pentoxifylline and antioxidants improve sperm quality in male patients with varicocele. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 1536–9.  Back to cited text no. 44
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Chronic epididymitis and leptin and their associations with semen characteristics in men with infertility
Song Xin,Ye Hao,Ma Zhi-Peng,Lin Nanhe,Chen Bin
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2019; : e13126
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 The safety and efficacy of acupuncture for epididymitis protocol for a systematic review
Jisheng Wang,Liang Han,Binghao Bao,Xudong Yu,Kaige Zhang,Hengheng Dai,Xiao Li,Bin Wang,Haisong Li
Medicine. 2019; 98(1): e13934
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and Methods
Results
Discussion
Author Contributions
Competing Interests
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3335    
    Printed82    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded176    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]