Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 52-56

Seasonal fluctuation in the secretion of the antioxidant melatonin is not associated with alterations in sperm DNA damage


1 Molecular Reproductive Research, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
2 Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway
3 Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Date of Submission07-Feb-2016
Date of Decision18-May-2016
Date of Acceptance11-Jul-2016
Date of Web Publication14-Oct-2016

Correspondence Address:
Gunilla Malm
Molecular Reproductive Research, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.186870

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

A high sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) is associated with reduced fertility. DFI is influenced by the balance between reactive oxygen species and antioxidants. A circannual variation in melatonin, an antioxidant and free radical scavenger, could thus impact semen quality and fertility. The association between the major melatonin metabolite, urine 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (aMT6s), and DFI was analyzed in 110 Oslo men (south of the Arctic Circle) and 86 Tromsoe men (north of the Arctic Circle). Two semen analyses, summer and winter, and four urine samples (early/late summer; early/late winter), were analyzed. The associations between aMT6s in urine and DFI were characterized in a cross-sectional and longitudinal manner using correlation analysis and linear regression. Regardless of season and location, no significant correlations between aMT6s and DFI were observed. The correlation coefficients for associations between changes over time (early winter-early summer) in aMT6s and DFI were for the total cohort: rho = −0.08 (P = 0.322), for the Oslo cohort: rho = −0.07 (P = 0.485), and for the Tromsoe cohort: rho = −0.14 (P = 0.273), respectively. Similar results were seen when comparing late winter and late summer. There was no any statistically significant correlation between changes over time in aMT6s and DFI for men with DFI below and above the median value (10%), respectively. The seasonal variation in melatonin excretion seems not to have any impact on DFI.

Keywords: male infertility; melatonin; semen quality; sperm DNA index


How to cite this article:
Malm G, Haugen TB, Rylander L, Giwercman A. Seasonal fluctuation in the secretion of the antioxidant melatonin is not associated with alterations in sperm DNA damage. Asian J Androl 2017;19:52-6

How to cite this URL:
Malm G, Haugen TB, Rylander L, Giwercman A. Seasonal fluctuation in the secretion of the antioxidant melatonin is not associated with alterations in sperm DNA damage. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Mar 26];19:52-6. Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2017/19/1/52/186870 - DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.186870


  Introduction Top


A conventional semen analysis is not a sufficient tool for assessment of male fertility status,[1] and evaluation of sperm DNA damage provides additional information about the fertilizing capacity of the sperm.[2] It has been shown that a high level of sperm DNA damage leads to reduced fertility in vivo.[3],[4] Evidence suggests that reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated damage to spermatozoa is a significant contributing factor in a substantial number of male infertility cases.[5] ROS can be generated or originate from various sources, both endogenous and exogenous.[6] Studies suggest that ROS attack the integrity of DNA in the sperm nucleus by causing base modifications, DNA strand breaks, and chromatin cross-linking. Due to the complex packaging arrangement of DNA, spermatozoa have limited defense mechanisms against oxidative stress.[7]

Furthermore, under normal conditions, spermatozoa generate low levels of ROS to stimulate proper sperm function[6] such as capacitation, hyperactivation, and sperm-oocyte fusion.[7] Seminal plasma serves as a natural reservoir of antioxidants, removes ROS, and consequently reduces oxidative stress.[8] Disturbances in the balance between ROS and antioxidant factors can damage spermatozoa impacting their fertilization capacity and disrupting their genetic integrity.[9],[10] Impairment of sperm DNA can be analyzed and quantified by measuring DNA fragmentation index (DFI).[6],[11]

Melatonin is a well-known powerful wide spectrum free-radical scavenger, believed to be the most effective natural lipophilic antioxidant. It can easily cross cell membranes and protect intracellular macromolecules and DNA by acting as a direct scavenger. Melatonin is a daylight-regulated hormone produced by the pineal gland with the highest secretion during the dark periods and transferred to semen through blood. The concentration of melatonin in testis tissue is in the same range as in other organs, e.g., in kidney and heart. Although extrapineal melatonin production has been suggested, it has so far not been proven.[8]

Birth rates vary over the year,[12] which could be due to a possible seasonal variation in DFI contributing to periodical changes in male fertility. It has also been suggested that daylight-dependent fluctuations in secretion of melatonin could impact male reproductive function.[13] Short-term exposure of spermatozoa to melatonin has been shown to improve semen quality in vitro, and higher melatonin and antioxidants levels have been studied in recently proven fathers.[5] A melatonin-related circannual variation in oxidative stress could, thus, have an impact on the quality of semen, and thereby affect birth rates.

In an attempt to further understand male reproductive physiology and the mechanism behind changes in birth rates, we have previously (2001-2002) studied the impact of daylight on sperm production.[14] We compared seasonal variation of reproductive parameters in Norway by comparing a group of men living in Oslo, in the Northern Hemisphere but south of the Arctic Circle, with men in Tromsoe, north of the Arctic Circle. In both locations, a substantial variation in photoperiod is seen over the year, with extreme variation in Tromsoe, resulting in 2 months of total darkness in the winter and a corresponding period of 24 h daylight in the summer. This is in contrast to Oslo with less pronounced light variation.

Despite this study design, no significant seasonal variation was found in spermatozoa concentration, total spermatozoa count, semen volume, or spermatozoa motility. However, a seasonal variation in melatonin levels was seen in both locations, most pronounced in Tromsoe. The same was true for testosterone levels in Oslo but not in Tromsoe. In the former location the levels of this hormone were also statistically significant correlated to urinary excretion of the major melatonin metabolite, urine 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (aMT6s).[13]

The antioxidant properties of melatonin and the relatively large variation in melatonin levels in the present study make it feasible to investigate the hypothesized association between melatonin and DFI levels.


  Materials and Methods Top


Subjects and study design

A total of 204 men were included in the present study, 112 from Oslo and 92 from Tromsoe. The participants were recruited to the study by advertising in local media. Criteria for being included in the study were as follows: 19-40-year-old men who had lived in respective area for a minimum of 1 year before the study start and were to remain in the area, except a maximum of 5 weeks holiday, during the year of the study. All except one participant answered a questionnaire concerning reproductive history and diseases that could influence their reproductive function.[14] The mean age of the participants was 27.5 years in Oslo and 29.8 years in Tromsoe. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.4 kg m−2 in Oslo, 25.3 kg m−2 in Tromsoe, and 24.8 kg m−2 for the total cohort, respectively.

For forty participants, one of two semen samples and one, two, or three of four blood samples were missing. There was no significant difference in age and semen parameters (total sperm count, sperm concentration, sperm motility, or semen volume) when comparing results from the 167 men who had measurements done at all four occasions compared to the above-mentioned forty cases (P > 0.20).

Tromsoe is located at 69°42'N, 348 km north of the Arctic Circle (66°33'N) and Oslo (59°56'N), 739 km south of the Arctic Circle. The distance between the two locations is approximately 1150 km. In both locations, a substantial variation in photoperiod is seen over the year.

The periods for urine and semen sample collections were based on the time of sunrise and sunset in the respective area. Overnight urine samples for analyzing the urinary excretion of the aMT6s were collected at two occasions during summer and two during winter. The first sample was collected approximately 70 days (i.e., the duration for spermatogenesis) before the second sample, and at the latter occasion, a semen sample was also collected. We have previously reported that there was a moderate agreement between DFI in the first and in the second semen sample from the same case.[15]

The first period was summer and the second period was winter. In Tromsoe, urine samples were collected close to the polar day (May 18), the second time, 2-3 months later (July 30 to August 10, 2001), the third time during winter, close to the polar night (November 28), and the fourth time, 2-3 months later after polar night (January 21 to February 1, 2002). In Oslo, urine samples were collected close to the days of solstices (June 21 and December 21, 2001) and 2-3 months thereafter (September 3 to 14, 2001 and March 4 to 15, 2002).

The subjects received a compensation of 1000 NOK for their participation. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Lund University, Sweden, and Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics, Southern Norway.

Semen analysis

Before delivering a semen sample, a period of abstinence of 2-3 days was recommended. However, for each case, the length of abstinence was recorded. The semen samples were analyzed according to the recommendations of the World Health Organization 1999.[16]

Sperm chromatin structure assay

The principles and procedures to measure DNA damage by flow cytometry semen chromatin structure assay (SCSA) are described in detail elsewhere.[17] In brief, the semen sample is exposed to low pH that denatures DNA at sites of single- or double-strand breaks whereas normal, double-stranded DNA remains intact. Thereafter, the sperm cells are stained with a fluorescent DNA dye, with which intact (double-stranded) DNA emits green fluorescence whereas denatured (single-stranded) DNA emits red fluorescence. Sperm chromatin damage is quantified in a flow cytometer (5000 cells counted in an FACSort [Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA]) and displayed as red versus green fluorescence intensity cytogram patterns. The extent of DNA denaturation is expressed as DFI, i.e., the ratio of red to total fluorescence intensity, i.e., the level of denatured DNA over the total DNA, and analyzed using the SCSA-Soft software (SCSA Diagnostics, Brookings, SD, USA).

All SCSA measurements were performed on semen, which on the day of analysis was quickly thawed and analyzed immediately. For the flow cytometer setup and calibration, a reference sample from a normal donor ejaculate retrieved from the laboratory repository was used.[17] The same reference sample was used for the whole study period. A reference was run for every fifth sample. The intralaboratory CV for the DFI analysis was 4.5%. A single SCSA measurement was made for each reference sample. All analyses were conducted at the same location.

Melatonin analysis

aMT6s was analyzed using a commercially available method kit (Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany). Urinary aMT6s concentrations were standardized for intra- and inter-individual variation in nocturnal diuresis by dividing the concentration of aMT6s (nmol l−1) by urinary creatinine levels (mmol l−1); the ratio is referred to as aMT6s throughout this study. Creatinine was analyzed on a Synchron LX20 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) using the Jaffé method. All assays were performed at the Department of Clinical Chemistry, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. Overnight (12 h) urine samples were collected at four occasions for each participant: early summer, late summer, early winter, and late winter, as described above.

Statistical analysis

Initially, the correlations between early and late aMT6s summer excretion and summer DFI were investigated using the nonparametric Spearman's test. All analyses were performed for the total cohort as well as separately for the Oslo and the Tromsoe cohort. Corresponding analyses were performed for the correlations between early and late aMT6s winter excretion and winter DFI.

To evaluate whether time-related variations in aMT6s were associated with similar variations in DFI, we investigated whether the difference in aMT6s (i.e., early winter aMT6s-early summer aMT6s or late winter aMT6s-late summer aMT6s) correlated with the difference in DFI (i.e., winter DFI-summer DFI). Furthermore, with the same setup, the association between differences in aMT6s (i.e., early winter aMT6s-early summer aMT6s or late winter aMT6s-late summer aMT6s) was also analyzed. To investigate whether the association between aMT6s and sperm DNA fragmentation level was dependent on the extent of sperm DNA damage, separate analyses were done for those with DFI below and above the median value (10%).

Finally, a post hoc statistical power analysis based on the available sample size was done. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 22, Chicago, IL, USA).


  Results Top


Summer and winter semen parameters, DFI and excretion of aMT6s

The mean DFI for the Oslo cohort was 12% (s.d. 7.4%) in summer and 11% (s.d. 6.1%) in winter. The corresponding values for Tromsoe were 12% (s.d. 8.8%) in summer and 12% (s.d. 7.5%) in winter. For the entire cohort, these values were 12% (8.0%) in summer and 11% (6.8%) in winter. The median DFI value in all samples was 10% and 6 of the men presented with a mean DFI above 30% - such high levels were reported to be associated with very low probability of conception in vivo.[18] The aMT6s values and DFI are presented in [Table 1].
Table 1: DFI and aMT6s summer and winter in the Oslo and Tromsoe cohorts


Click here to view


The intraindividual summer-winter coefficient variation for DFI was 14.8% and the corresponding value for aMT6s (early summer, late summer, early winter, and late winter) was 24.4%. When taking the summer (early and late) and winter (early and late) values separately for aMT6s within the same man, the coefficient variation for summer was 17.3% and for winter was 15.8%, respectively.

As previously reported, differences in standard sperm parameters between summer and winter were not statistically significant at either location, nor were they significant when subjects from both cities were analyzed as one group.[14] The results for the sperm parameters are given in [Table 2]. As shown in [Table 3], there was a statistically significant negative correlation between DFI and progressive sperm motility (A + B), both summer and winter in Oslo, Tromsoe and when analyzing Oslo and Tromsoe together. In the Oslo group, there was a statistically significant negative correlation in early summer between DFI and sperm concentration.
Table 2: Seasonal variation in sperm parameters in Oslo and Tromsoe cohorts


Click here to view
Table 3. The association between DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and semen parameters in Oslo and Tromsoe computed with a Spearman's correlation coefficient, rho (P value)


Click here to view


Association between aMT6s and DFI

There were no significant correlations between aMT6s and DFI, neither for the winter/summer comparisons nor for the separate cohorts. The correlation coefficients varied between −0.18 and 0.11 ([Table 4]).

The correlation coefficients for associations between time-related differences (early winter-early summer) in aMT6s and in DFI were for the total cohort: rho = −0.08 (P = 0.322); for the Oslo cohort: rho = −0.07 (P = 0.485); and for the Tromsoe cohort: rho = −0.14 (P = 0.273) ([Table 4]). The pattern was very similar when the differences between late winter and late summer were compared.
Table 4: The association between DFI and aMT6s excretion in Oslo and Tromsoe computed with a Spearman's correlation coefficient rho (P)


Click here to view


Furthermore, there were no statistically significant correlations between time-related differences (early winter-early summer) for aMT6s and DFI or men with DFI <10% (rho = −0.068, P = 0.53), and aMT6s or for late winter-late summer (rho = 0.008, P = 0.94). The corresponding results for men with DFI ≥10% were (rho = −0.071, P = 0.53) for early winter-early summer and (rho = −0.13, P = 0.21) for late winter-late summer.

Post hoc statistical analysis

A post hoc statistical power analysis showed that the available sample size was sufficient to fined a correlation coefficient of 0.2 with a statistical power of 0.8 (α = 0.05) (https://www.statstodo.com/SSizCorr_Pgm.php).


  Discussion Top


Despite the design of the study with significant differences in the length of the daylight period, in particular north of the Arctic Circle, the previously reported winter-summer variation in excretion of aMT6s, the major melatonin metabolite, was not associated with corresponding fluctuations in DFI levels in summer and winter. Neither were there any significant correlations when comparing differences in aMT6s with DFI for the participants with DFI below nor above the median value of 10%. In general, DFI >30% is considered to have a negative impact on male fertility in vivo;[18] however, due to an insufficient number of men with DFI >30%, the subjects were divided into two groups according to the median DFI value.

Based on the way of recruitment and also on the background characteristics for both groups of men, we assume that they represent healthy Norwegian men, and the lack of circannual variation in DFI is not due to an underlying pathological condition. Despite a rather young age, 27% and 49% of subjects in Oslo and Tromsoe, respectively, reported proven fertility. Fertility problems were claimed by 5% of men in Oslo and by 15% of men in Tromsoe, in which numbers also include a female factor being at an expected level in the general population. Chronic diseases had been diagnosed in only a few men.[14] Data on ethnicity were not included in this study. There may be genetic differences between the two groups, perhaps with a higher proportion of Sámi and Russian admixture in Tromsoe; however, since each participant served as his own control, the genetic impact might be of less importance.

Our sample size was sufficient to find, with a statistical power of 0.8, correlation coefficient of 0.2 for the association between aMT6s and DFI. Thus, if melatonin excretion has any impact on sperm DFI, <5% of the variation in the latter can be explained by fluctuations in melatonin levels.

One of the weaknesses of the study is access to only a single measurement of sperm DFI for each of the two seasons. In this context, a key issue is the question of timing between variations in the oxidative stress and its effects on sperm DNA. Assuming a short lag period between changes in melatonin secretion, subsequent variations in oxidative stress level and in DFI, measurements of the major melatonin metabolite in urine were done at the same time as the semen sample collection. However, similar results were obtained when looking at melatonin levels 55-85 days before sample collection. One can speculate whether melatonin levels assessed at an intermediate time interval before semen analysis might show a stronger association with DFI.

Different mechanisms for sperm DNA damage have been described, and it seems most probable that it occurs at late stages of spermatogenesis and/or during the posttesticular period.[19] Spermatozoa are relatively deficient in ROS scavenging enzymes, and the degree of sperm DNA fragmentation in ejaculated spermatozoa can be higher than in those obtained from the testis and caput or corpus epididymis.[20] Therefore, the protective, antioxidative effect of melatonin in relation to sperm DNA integrity is expected to be rather immediate and should be seen when analyzing urine samples obtained just before delivery of ejaculates. The production and excretion of aMT6s follows an individual's circadian rhythm, such as melatonin, and the measurement of aMT6s in urine provides a noninvasive, integrated parameter by which these rhythms can be assessed.[21]

Melatonin has been shown to have antioxidative properties, and earlier studies have demonstrated the ability of melatonin to scavenge oxygen-derived free radicals.[22] Damaged sperm DNA measured as increased DFI has been shown to be an independent risk factor for decreased male fertility.[23] In a recent study, it was shown that melatonin supplementation (6 mg melatonin daily >45 days) to infertile men resulted in increased semen antioxidant capacity, a reduction in oxidative associated sperm DNA damage and improved in vitro fertilization treatment results.[22] According to Ortiz et al., recently proven fathers had higher melatonin and antioxidants levels compared to infertile men, and melatonin had beneficial effects on human spermatozoa in vitro.[5] This is in contrast to another recent study in infertile men where melatonin in seminal plasma was positively correlated with damaged sperm DNA, thus indicating that melatonin could have a negative impact on sperm function.[24]

Seasonal variation in DFI could, thus, be a causative factor behind fluctuating birth rates. In the present study, we demonstrate that despite extreme daylight variation and seasonal differences in aMT6s values, no significant seasonal variation in DFI was seen, neither does the DFI values correlate with the excretion of aMT6s. The fact that there was a significantly negative correlation between sperm motility and DFI may suggest that DFI mainly reflects immotile or nonviable sperm.


  Conclusions Top


Our study indicates that DFI does not display any seasonal variation and does not correlate with the seasonal variations in excretion of the major melatonin metabolite aMT6s, and the circannual variation in this sperm parameter is, therefore, hardly involved in the mechanism of seasonal variations in birth rate.


  Author Contributions Top


GM, AG, and TBH are responsible for study conception and design. GM wrote the first version of the manuscript. LR and GM performed statistical analyses and interpreted data. All authors approved of the final version to be published.


  Competing Interests Top


None of the authors declared competing financial interests.


  Acknowledgments Top


This research has been given grants from the Swedish Research Council (Grant 2014_3185); the Skane University Hospital Foundation, and the Swedish governmental funding for clinical research.

 
  References Top

1.
Bonde JP, Ernst E, Jensen TK, Hjollund NH, Kolstad H, et al. Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners. Lancet 1998; 352: 1172-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Giwercman A, Lindstedt L, Larsson M, Bungum M, Spano M, et al. Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control study. Int J Androl 2010; 33: e221-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, Spano M, Bungum L, et al. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 174-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Oleszczuk K, Augustinsson L, Bayat N, Giwercman A, Bungum M. Prevalence of high DNA fragmentation index in male partners of unexplained infertile couples. Andrology 2013; 1: 357-60.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ortiz A, Espino J, Bejarano I, Lozano GM, Monllor F, et al. High endogenous melatonin concentrations enhance sperm quality and short-term in vitro exposure to melatonin improves aspects of sperm motility. J Pineal Res 2011; 50: 132-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kothari S, Thompson A, Agarwal A, du Plessis SS. Free radicals: their beneficial and detrimental effects on sperm function. Indian J Exp Biol 2010; 48: 425-35.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Cocuzza M, Sikka SC, Athayde KS, Agarwal A. Clinical relevance of oxidative stress and sperm chromatin damage in male infertility: an evidence based analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2007; 33: 603-21.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kratz EM, Piwowar A, Zeman M, Stebelova K, Thalhammer T. Decreased melatonin levels and increased levels of advanced oxidation protein products in the seminal plasma are related to male infertility. Reprod Fertil Dev 2014; 28: 507-15.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Aitken RJ, Smith TB, Jobling MS, Baker MA, De Iuliis GN. Oxidative stress and male reproductive health. Asian J Androl 2014; 16: 31-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Donnelly ET, McClure N, Lewis SE. Antioxidant supplementation in vitro does not improve human sperm motility. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 484-95.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Aitken RJ, Baker MA. Oxidative stress and male reproductive biology. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004; 16: 581-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Werschler T, Halli S. The seasonality of births in Canada - A comparisin with the Northern United States. Popul Environ 1992; 14: 85-94.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ruhayel Y, Malm G, Haugen TB, Henrichsen T, Bjorsvik C, et al. Seasonal variation in serum concentrations of reproductive hormones and urinary excretion of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin in men living North and South of the Arctic Circle: a longitudinal study. Clin Endocrinol 2007; 67: 85-92.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Malm G, Haugen TB, Henrichsen T, Bjorsvik C, Grotmol T, et al. Reproductive function during summer and winter in Norwegian men living North and South of the Arctic Circle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 4397-402.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Rylander L, Wetterstrand B, Haugen TB, Malm G, Malm J, et al. Single semen analysis as a predictor of semen quality: clinical and epidemiological implications. Asian J Androl 2009; 11: 723-30.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge, UK, New York: Published on Behalf of the World Health Organization, Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 128. [Px].  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Evenson D, Jost L. Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Methods Cell Sci 2000; 22: 169-89.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Spano M, Bonde JP, Hjollund HI, Kolstad HA, Cordelli E, et al. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 43-50.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Agarwal A, Saleh RA, Bedaiwy MA. Role of reactive oxygen species in the pathophysiology of human reproduction. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 829-43.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Giwercman A, Spanò M, Bungum M. Sperm DNA damage: Causes and guidelines for current clinical practice. In: Racowsky C, Schlegel PN, Fauser BC, Carrell DT, editors. Biennial Review of Infertility. US: Springer; 2011. p. 155-79.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Bojkowski CJ, Arendt J, Shih MC, Markey SP. Melatonin secretion in humans assessed by measuring its metabolite, 6-sulfatoxymelatonin. Clin Chem 1987; 33: 1343-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Bejarano I, Monllor F, Marchena AM, Ortiz A, Lozano G, et al. Exogenous melatonin supplementation prevents oxidative stress-evoked DNA damage in human spermatozoa. J Pineal Res 2014; 57: 333-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Bungum M, Bungum L, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA): a tool in diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Asian J Androl 2011; 13: 69-75.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Sharbatoghli M, Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Bahadori MH, Salman Yazdi R, Ghaleno LR. The relationship between seminal melatonin with sperm parameters, DNA fragmentation and nuclear maturity in intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection candidates. Cell J 2015; 17: 547-53.  Back to cited text no. 24
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Author Contributions
Competing Interests
Acknowledgments
Conclusions
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed519    
    Printed39    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded94    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]