Table of Contents  
INVITED COMMENTARY
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 333

Commentary on "validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal" by Dr. Parviz K Kavoussi


The PUR Clinic, South Lake Hospital, Clermont, FL, USA

Date of Web Publication30-Dec-2014

Correspondence Address:
Sijo J Parekattil
The PUR Clinic, South Lake Hospital, Clermont, FL
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.145631

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Parekattil SJ. Commentary on "validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal" by Dr. Parviz K Kavoussi. Asian J Androl 2015;17:333

How to cite this URL:
Parekattil SJ. Commentary on "validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal" by Dr. Parviz K Kavoussi. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Dec 16];17:333. Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2015/17/2/333/145631 - DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.145631

The author should be commended for this early work on the reproducibility and application of robotic assisted microsurgery for vasectomy reversal. [1] Initial prospective randomized control studies by Schiff et al. [2] in a rodent model illustrated potential advantages to the use of robotics in microsurgery in terms of increased surgical efficiency and a decreased surgical learning curve. A follow-up prospective cohort trial by our group continued to show evidence of such advantages in the clinical setting in a single surgeon experience. [3] There have been small clinical series reports from other institutions as well. Robotic-assisted vasectomy reversal is in its infancy and more comparative studies from other institutions are very beneficial in truly assessing the value of such techniques. Dr. Kavoussi's work in this manuscript adds valuable assessment data to continue our journey in exploring potential benefits or disadvantages of this technology. [1] As more robotic platforms become available and as the technology evolves, it is likely that the application and use of such technology will only continue to expand further. If we can use this technology to allow urologists to become more proficient micro surgeons in a shorter and more efficient pathway compared with traditional pure microsurgery, it is our patients and the general community who benefits in the end. This ultimately is our most noble goal.

 
  References Top

1.
Kavoussi PK. Validation of robot - Assisted vasectomy reversal. Asian J Androl 2015 doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.142141.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Schiff J, Li PS, Goldstein M. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model. J Urol 2004; 171: 1720-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Parekattil SJ, Gudeloglu A, Brahmbhatt J, Wharton J, Priola KB. Robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal: technique and prospective database control trial. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28: 435-44.  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1183    
    Printed37    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded184    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]