|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 281-284
Follicle-stimulating hormone as a predictor for sperm retrieval rate in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Qi Yang, Yan-Ping Huang, Hong-Xiang Wang, Kai Hu, Yi-Xin Wang, Yi-Ran Huang, Bin Chen
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Andrology, Shanghai 200127, China
|Date of Submission||09-Mar-2014|
|Date of Decision||27-Apr-2014|
|Date of Acceptance||13-Jun-2014|
|Date of Web Publication||23-Sep-2014|
Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Andrology, Shanghai 200127
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Noninvasive parameters for predicating sperm retrieval rate (SRR) are desirables. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) has been an important predictor since the first years of testicular sperm extraction. Recent studies showed continuous interests in FSH, with both pros and cons. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of FSH as a predictor for patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) taking testicular sperm retrieval. Eligible diagnosis tests were identified from electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and EMBASE) without language restrictions. The database search, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The reference standard was the sperm retrieval result. Diagnostic value of FSH were explored by area under receiver operation characteristics (ROC) curve using Review Manager, version 5.1.0 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and Meta-DiSc, version 1.4. Meta regression will be done if there is heterogeneity. Then, we find 11 tests including a total of 1350 patients met the inclusion criteria. Our pooled analysis showed that the area under ROC curve of FSH was 0.72 ± 0.04. Meta regression analyses showed that region and average age have an influence on the diagnostic value. FSH showed more diagnostic value with patients in East Asia and with younger patients. We concluded that FSH had moderate value in independently predicating SRR in men with NOA (area under curve >0.7). More detailed diagnosis tests should be anticipated in the future to confirm the diagnostic value of other noninvasive parameters.
Keywords: follicule-stimulating hormone; meta-analysis; nonobstructive azoospermia; testicular sperm retrieval
|How to cite this article:|
Yang Q, Huang YP, Wang HX, Hu K, Wang YX, Huang YR, Chen B. Follicle-stimulating hormone as a predictor for sperm retrieval rate in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 2015;17:281-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Yang Q, Huang YP, Wang HX, Hu K, Wang YX, Huang YR, Chen B. Follicle-stimulating hormone as a predictor for sperm retrieval rate in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Jul 6];17:281-4. Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2015/17/2/281/139259 - DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.139259
| Introduction|| |
Azoospermia occurs in 1% of men and 10%-12% of the infertile male population. Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), which is caused by testicular failure, represents 60% of all cases of azoospermia. , Since the first successful surgical sperm retrieval in combination with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 1994, the use of surgically retrieved sperm from the testis for ICSI has made it possible for patients with NOA to father children. ,
However, the recovery of spermatozoa is successful in only 50% of cases and therefore it would be beneficial to predict the success of sperm retrieval using noninvasive parameters before attempted treatment. , This would not only decrease the surgical risk and the inconvenience to the patient, but also lower the costs of the infertility workup. Although no single clinical finding or investigation able to accurately predict has been found, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) has been an important preoperative serum parameter studied since the first years of testicular sperm extraction (TESE).  In general, the serum FSH concentration is inversely related to sperm retrieval rate (SRR). ,
Recent studies showed continuous interests in the value of FSH in prediction, with both pros and cons. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic value of FSH as a predictor for SRR in patients with NOA before testicular sperm retrieval.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Systematic search strategy
We searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (from 1994 to June 2013), and EMBASE (from 1994 to June 2013). The following search terms were used to identify any relevant studies: "FSH" and "sperm retrieval, or TESE, or microdissection TESE (MESE)." In addition, identified reports, reviews of the included studies, and other relevant publications from the American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, and Societe Internationale d'Urologie between 2007 and 2013 were manually searched. Conference abstracts were excluded because of the limited data presented in them.
Identification of articles
Diagnosis tests were included only if they met the criteria of testing the diagnostic value of FSH as a predictor for SRR in patients with NOA before TESE/MESE, with general demographic data like patients' age (average age), excluding the presence of limiting to any particular cause of NOA, such as AZFa deletion, or of usage of any other sperm retrieval technique like sperm aspiration that was obviously less successful. Tests without definitive four-fold table were also excluded.
Quality assessment of included studies
The titles and abstracts of all articles were reviewed by two reviewers according to the inclusion criteria using a standardized form. If inconsistencies existed between the reviewers' data, a third reviewer evaluated the data. Quality assessment was performed using methods adapted from two guidelines on systematic reviews of diagnostic studies. ,
For each study, the following quality criteria were scored as fulfilled or not: (1) independent comparison of FSH level against TESE/MESE results; (2) blinded (single or double) interpretation of test and reference standard results; (3) unsolved data preformed. If no data on the above criteria were reported in the primary studies, we requested the information from the authors. For the purposes of analysis, responses coded as "not reported" were grouped together with "not met." A high-quality study was arbitrarily defined as that which met all three criteria; a medium quality met two of the three criteria; and low quality study met <2/3 criteria.
Our primary outcome was the summary receiver operation characteristics (SROC) and the area under ROC curve (AUC) of FSH's diagnostic value as a predictor for SRR in patients with NOA before TESE/MESE, while TESE/MESE result was the reference standard, followed by sensitivity, specificity and diagnosis odds ratio (DOR).
Data synthesis and analysis
All analyses were performed using the Review Manager, version 5.1.0 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and Meta-DiSc, version 1.4 (Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Ramony Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain). P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Four-fold tables of each test were fulfilled with numbers of true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative.
The categorical data were presented as specificity and sensitivity, both with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous outcomes were presented as SROC, and qualitatively described as AUC. The chi-square test and I2 statistic were used to analyze the heterogeneity in the results.  Meta regression and stratified analyses on year of publication, region, patients' average age and sample size will be performed to identify the source of heterogeneity if necessary.
| Results|| |
The combined search strategies identified 11 diagnosis tests, ,,,,,,,,,,, including 1350 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Ten of the studies were reported in English, and one was in Chinese. The characteristics and the quality score of the quality assessment of the 11 studies are presented in [Table 1]. All trials were deemed middle or high quality.
Diagnostic accuracy of follicle-stimulating hormone
[Figure 1] displays the sensitivity, specificity and DOR estimates from each of the 11 studies. Both sensitivity and specificity estimates were highly variable. Summary measures were grossly heterogeneous (P < 0.05) and therefore would not be appropriately summarized. The SROC curve displays an ROC-type trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. The AUC ([Figure 2]) of the 11 studies was 0.72 ± 0.04, with a sensitivity of 0.70 (0.66-0.73) and a specificity of 0.62 (0.58-0.66).
|Figure 1: Sensitivity, specificity and diagnosis OR estimates from each of the 11 studies. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; df: degree of freedom.|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: SROC curve from each of the 11 studies. SROC: summary receiver operation characteristics; AUC: area under curve; SE: standard error; Q*: Q-index.|
Click here to view
We performed meta regression and stratified analyses to identify sources of heterogeneity among these studies. [Table 2] presents two factors that appeared most strongly associated with the observed heterogeneity. Studies in region 1 produced DOR estimates nearly 4 times higher than studies in other regions, and the former showed an AUC >0.7. Studies with patients' average age under 33 produced DOR estimates nearly 4 times higher than studies with patients' average age above 33, and the former showed an AUC >0.7.
|Table 2: Stratified analyses for the evaluation of heterogeneity in studies |
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic review with a meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of noninvasive parameters for SRR in patients with NOA before TESE/MESE.
Our pooled analysis for FSH in predicating SRR in patients with NOA showed that the AUC of FSH's diagnostic value was 0.72 ± 0.04. As far as is known, AUC < 0.7, 0.7-0.9, and > 0.9 mean little, moderate and high diagnosis value, respectively. , This meta-analysis indicated that FSH had a dubitable moderate diagnostic value in predicating SRR.
High sensitivity means low specificity, and DOR makes a balance of both. Heterogeneity of DOR showed statistical significance (P < 0.01, I2 = 71.3%). Then, meta regression and stratified analyses showed that region and average patients' age were two factors that appeared most strongly associated with the observed heterogeneity. In East Asia or with younger patients, FSH showed a more clear diagnostic value.
Region, interestingly, had an influence on the diagnostic value of FSH according to this meta-analysis, indicating that other factors affecting spermatogenic function might have less effects in East Asia. One factor draw our attention was serum and seminal leptin level. People in region 1 have lower body mass index than other regions, , and leptin, which impacts spermatogenic,  is associated with this.  Thus patients in region 2 or 3 might have a leptin level around the threshold, interfering FSH's diagnostic value.
Aging is a clear factor that impact spermatogenic function, and meanwhile increase FSH.  Our results suggested that age had a greater influence on the former. In fact, the increase of FSH is a side-effect of decrease of androgen with aging, and deficiency of androgen is also an etiology of dyszoospermia.
However, FSH alone is still quite not enough (AUC < 0.9). Recent studies ,, have payed more attentions on models of combinations of different noninvasive parameters, for example inhibin B FSH ratio, and adorable AUC has been produced. Thus similar studies on other noninvasive parameters, such as inhibin B, testis volume, leptin and on models are of great value.
Our review has some limitations. Diagnosis criteria for NOA were different among authors. Thus only studies with the term NOA were included. Our analysis lacked data on FSH level for each patient. Then, a threshold could not be calculated. However, different threshold means different specificity and sensitivity, which resulting in the SROC. And public bias could be evidenced in the forest plot, luckily subgroup analyses showed little heterogeneity.
| Conclusions|| |
Follicle-stimulating hormone had moderate diagnostic value as an independent predictor for SRR in patients with NOA. Region and patients' age might influence its diagnostic value. FSH showed more diagnostic value in East Asia and with younger patients. The threshold was still unclear, thus, more detailed diagnosis tests should be anticipated in the future to confirm the diagnostic value of other noninvasive parameters and models of combinations of them.
| Author Contributions|| |
QY reviewed articles, analyzed data, and drafted the manuscript; YPH reviewed articles, analyzed data and revised the manuscript critically; HXW participated in as the third reviewer and drafting the manuscript; KH participated in data analyzing and revised the manuscript; YXW participated in its design and helped to draft the manuscript; YRH supervised the project and revised manuscript; BC conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
| Competing Interests|| |
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
| Acknowledgments|| |
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81270741).
| References|| |
Willott GM. Frequency of azoospermia. Forensic Sci Int
1982; 20: 9-10.
Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol
1989; 142: 62-5.
Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Tournaye H, Silber SJ, et al
. Normal fertilization of human oocytes after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril
1994; 62: 639-41.
Ishikawa T. Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl
2012; 14: 109-15.
Chan PT, Schlegel PN. Nonobstructive azoospermia. Curr Opin Urol
2000; 10: 617-24.
Glander HJ, Horn LC, Dorschner W, Paasch U, Kratzsch J. Probability to retrieve testicular spermatozoa in azoospermic patients. Asian J Androl
2000; 2: 199-205.
Chen CS, Chu SH, Lai YM, Wang ML, Chan PR. Reconsideration of testicular biopsy and follicle-stimulating hormone measurement in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-obstructive azoospermia? Hum Reprod
1996; 11: 2176-9.
Ezeh UI, Moore HD, Cooke ID. A prospective study of multiple needle biopsies versus a single open biopsy for testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod
1998; 13: 3075-80.
Jarvi K, Lo K, Fischer A, Grantmyre J, Zini A, et al.
CUA Guideline: the workup of azoospermic males. Can Urol Assoc J
2010; 4: 163-7.
Ballescá JL, Balasch J, Calafell JM, Alvarez R, Fábregues F, et al.
Serum inhibin B determination is predictive of successful testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod
2000; 15: 1734-8.
Amer M, Abd Elnasser T, El Haggar S, Mostafa T, Abdel-Malak G, et al
. May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain for detection of spermatogenic cells in the ejaculate: a simple predictive parameter for successful testicular sperm retrieval. Hum Reprod
2001; 16: 1427-32.
Vernaeve V, Tournaye H, Schiettecatte J, Verheyen G, Van Steirteghem A, et al
. Serum inhibin B cannot predict testicular sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod
2002; 17: 971-6.
Nagata Y, Fujita K, Banzai J, Kojima Y, Kasima K, et al.
Seminal plasma inhibin-B level is a useful predictor of the success of conventional testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res
2005; 31: 384-8.
Fei Qianjin HX, Zhang Liya, Li Chengdi. The predictive value of serum inhibin B for successful testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Chin J Androl
2006; 20: 25-7.
Tunc L, Kirac M, Gurocak S, Yucel A, Kupeli B, et al.
Can serum inhibin B and FSH levels, testicular histology and volume predict the outcome of testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia? Int Urol Nephrol
2006; 38: 629-35.
Mostafa T, Amer MK, Abdel-Malak G, Nsser TA, Zohdy W, et al.
Seminal plasma anti-Müllerian hormone level correlates with semen parameters but does not predict success of testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Asian J Androl
2007; 9: 265-70.
Ma Y, Chen B, Wang H, Hu K, Huang Y. Prediction of sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia using artificial neural networks: leptin is a good assistant diagnostic marker. Hum Reprod
2011; 26: 294-8.
Boitrelle F, Robin G, Marcelli F, Albert M, Leroy-Martin B, et al.
A predictive score for testicular sperm extraction quality and surgical ICSI outcome in non-obstructive azoospermia: a retrospective study. Hum Reprod
2011; 26: 3215-21.
Ghalayini IF, Al-Ghazo MA, Hani OB, Al-Azab R, Bani-Hani I, et al.
Clinical comparison of conventional testicular sperm extraction and microdissection techniques for non-obstructive azoospermia. J Clin Med Res
2011; 3: 124-31.
Huang X, Bai Q, Yan LY, Zhang QF, Geng L, et al
. Combination of serum inhibin B and follicle-stimulating hormone levels cannot improve the diagnostic accuracy on testicular sperm extraction outcomes in Chinese non-obstructive azoospermic men. Chin Med J (Engl)
2012; 125: 2885-9.
Brugo-Olmedo S, De Vincentiis S, Calamera JC, Urrutia F, Nodar F, et al
. Serum inhibin B may be a reliable marker of the presence of testicular spermatozoa in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril
2001; 76: 1124-9.
Huang X, Zheng J, Wu X. Surgical retrieval of testicular spermatozoa and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermic patients. Chin J Urol
2002; 11: 002.
Bohring C, Schroeder-Printzen I, Weidner W, Krause W. Serum levels of inhibin B and follicle-stimulating hormone may predict successful sperm retrieval in men with azoospermia who are undergoing testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril
2002; 78: 1195-8.
Colpi GM, Colpi EM, Piediferro G, Giacchetta D, Gazzano G, et al.
Microsurgical TESE versus conventional TESE for ICSI in non-obstructive azoospermia: a randomized controlled study. Reprod Biomed Online
2009; 18: 315-9.
Ramasamy R, Padilla WO, Osterberg EC, Srivastava A, Reifsnyder JE, et al.
A comparison of models for predicting sperm retrieval before microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol
2013; 189: 638-42.
Irwig L, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis C, Lau J, Colditz G, et al.
Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med
1994; 120: 667-76.
Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, et al.
Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol
2002; 2: 9.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ
2003; 327: 557-60.
Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev Vet Med
2000; 45: 23-41.
Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser
2000; 894: i-xii, 1-253.
Dongfeng G, Guangyong H, Xigui W, Xiufang D. Relationship between body mass index and major cardiovascular diseases in Chinese population. Natl Med J China
2002; 82: 13-6.
Cabler S, Agarwal A, Flint M, du Plessis SS. Obesity: modern man's fertility nemesis. Asian J Androl
2010; 12: 480-9.
Grunewald S, Glander HJ, Paasch U, Kratzsch J. Age-dependent inhibin B concentration in relation to FSH and semen sample qualities: a study in 2448 men. Reproduction
2013; 145: 237-44.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Predictors of surgical sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia: summary of current literature
| ||Muhammad A. Arshad,Ahmad Majzoub,Sandro C. Esteves |
| ||International Urology and Nephrology. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Determining an optimal cut-off value for follicle-stimulating hormone to predict microsurgical testicular sperm extraction outcome in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia
| ||Bahia Namavar Jahromi,Shahryar Zeyghami,Mohammad Ebrahim Parsanezhad,Parvin Ghaemmaghami,Afsoon Zarei,Maryam Azizi kutenaee,Parastoo Sohail,Pedram Keshavarz |
| ||Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Prediction of sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia patients: a machine-learning perspective
| ||A Zeadna,N Khateeb,L Rokach,Y Lior,I Har-Vardi,A Harlev,M Huleihel,E Lunenfeld,E Levitas |
| ||Human Reproduction. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Risk factors affecting post-pubertal high serum follicle-stimulating hormone in patients with hypospadias
| ||Kimihiko Moriya,Michiko Nakamura,Masafumi Kon,Yoko Nishimura,Yukiko Kanno,Takeya Kitta,Nobuo Shinohara |
| ||World Journal of Urology. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Testicular Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Magnetization Transfer Ratio: Can These MRI Parameters Be Used to Predict Successful Sperm Retrieval in Nonobstructive Azoospermia?
| ||Alexandra Ntorkou,Athina C. Tsili,Anna Goussia,Loukas G. Astrakas,Vasileios Maliakas,Nikolaos Sofikitis,Maria I. Argyropoulou |
| ||American Journal of Roentgenology. 2019; : 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||A risk prediction model of sperm retrieval failure with fine needle aspiration in males with non-obstructive azoospermia
| ||Yue Ma,Fuping Li,Li Wang,Wenrui Zhao,Dingming Li,Yang Xian,Xiaohui Jiang |
| ||Human Reproduction. 2019; 34(2): 200 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
| ||Giovanni Corona,Suks Minhas,Aleksander Giwercman,Carlo Bettocchi,Marij Dinkelman-Smit,Gert Dohle,Ferdinando Fusco,Ates Kadioglou,Sabine Kliesch,Zsolt Kopa,Csilla Krausz,Fiore Pelliccione,Alessandro Pizzocaro,Jens Rassweiler,Paolo Verze,Linda Vignozzi,Wolfgang Weidner,Mario Maggi,Nikolaos Sofikitis |
| ||Human Reproduction Update. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Testiculaire sperma-extractie (TESE): een update
| ||Marij Dinkelman-Smit |
| ||Tijdschrift voor Urologie. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Predictive value of pre-operative inflammation-based prognostic scores (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-eosinophil ratio) in testicular sperm extraction: a pilot study
| ||C. Yucel,M. Z. Keskin,O. Cakmak,B. Ergani,C. Kose,O. Celik,E. Islamoglu,M. Ucar,G. Koc,Z. Kozacioglu |
| ||Andrology. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Prediction model for obtaining spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia
| ||M. Cissen,A.M. Meijerink,K.W. DæHauwers,A. Meissner,N. van der Weide,M.H. Mochtar,A.A. de Melker,L. Ramos,S. Repping,D.D.M. Braat,K. Fleischer,M. van Wely |
| ||Human Reproduction. 2016; : dew147 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Impact of testicular histopathology as a predictor of sperm retrieval and pregnancy outcome in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: correlation with clinical and hormonal factors
| ||I. Guler,M. Erdem,A. Erdem,E. Demirdag,L. Tunc,N. Bozkurt,M. F. Mutlu,M. Oktem |
| ||Andrologia. 2015; : n/a |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The impact of chronic testicular inflammatory infiltration on spermatogenesis in azoospermic men, evidence-based pilot study
| ||Ahmed M Hassanin,Essam Ayad |
| ||Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2015; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|