|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 675-683
Expression of androgen receptor target genes in skeletal muscle
Kesha Rana, Nicole KL Lee, Jeffrey D Zajac, Helen E MacLean
Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
|Date of Submission||26-Aug-2013|
|Date of Decision||13-Oct-2013|
|Date of Acceptance||03-Nov-2013|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Mar-2014|
Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
We aimed to determine the mechanisms of the anabolic actions of androgens in skeletal muscle by investigating potential androgen receptor (AR)-regulated genes in in vitro and in vivo models. The expression of the myogenic regulatory factor myogenin was significantly decreased in skeletal muscle from testosterone-treated orchidectomized male mice compared to control orchidectomized males, and was increased in muscle from male AR knockout mice that lacked DNA binding activity (ARΔZF2 ) versus wildtype mice, demonstrating that myogenin is repressed by the androgen/AR pathway. The ubiquitin ligase Fbxo32 was repressed by 12 h dihydrotestosterone treatment in human skeletal muscle cell myoblasts, and c-Myc expression was decreased in testosterone-treated orchidectomized male muscle compared to control orchidectomized male muscle, and increased in AR∆ZF2 muscle. The expression of a group of genes that regulate the transition from myoblast proliferation to differentiation, Tceal7 , p57 Kip2, Igf2 and calcineurin Aa, was increased in AR∆ZF2 muscle, and the expression of all but p57 Kip2 was also decreased in testosterone-treated orchidectomized male muscle compared to control orchidectomized male muscle. We conclude that in males, androgens act via the AR in part to promote peak muscle mass by maintaining myoblasts in the proliferative state and delaying the transition to differentiation during muscle growth and development, and by suppressing ubiquitin ligase-mediated atrophy pathways to preserve muscle mass in adult muscle.
Keywords: androgen receptor; anabolic; atrophy; gene expression; skeletal muscle
|How to cite this article:|
Rana K, Lee NK, Zajac JD, MacLean HE. Expression of androgen receptor target genes in skeletal muscle. Asian J Androl 2014;16:675-83
|How to cite this URL:|
Rana K, Lee NK, Zajac JD, MacLean HE. Expression of androgen receptor target genes in skeletal muscle. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Aug 8];16:675-83. Available from: http://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2014/16/5/675/122861 - DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.122861
Kesha Rana, Nicole KL Lee
These authors contributed equally to this work
| Introduction|| |
There is considerable interest in identifying the mechanisms of androgen action in muscle as androgens are one of the few classes of drugs that are anabolic in muscle. However, they are not used widely because of their potential and known negative side effects. , Developing more targeted androgen-related therapies may enable their use in a wide range of disorders of low muscle mass including those associated with trauma, chronic disease and age-related sarcopenia.
Clinical studies show that testosterone treatment in hypogonadal ,, and eugonadal , men can increase skeletal muscle mass and strength. Furthermore, testosterone suppression can result in a reduction in muscle size and strength. ,, Androgens act through the androgen receptor (AR), predominantly via the genomic pathway, which involves DNA binding and transcriptional regulation of target genes.  To understand how androgens increase muscle mass, it is necessary to identify the genes regulated by androgens and the AR in muscle. Androgen-regulated genes have been identified from orchidectomy studies (in rodents) , and in a study comparing males and females;  however, the expression of these genes may be regulated by the combined actions of androgens and estrogens.
One of the questions regarding the anabolic actions of androgens in muscle is whether the mechanisms of action are the same during development as adulthood. Androgens, acting through the AR, are required in males to reach peak muscle mass in adulthood, which may include effects on myogenic commitment , or anabolic/proliferation-related pathways. , Androgens are also required by adults to maintain muscle mass, which may occur via suppression of atrophy/protein turnover pathways.  There may or may not be an overlap between these gene regulatory pathways. Another issue is whether muscles of different fiber types or anatomical location respond to androgens in the same pattern. A recent review of the effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in men shows that in addition to the effects on muscle mass described above, upper limb strength is reduced more than lower limb strength,  suggesting anatomical differences in response. In contrast, there have been no demonstrated effects of ADT on muscle endurance,  suggesting that slow-twitch fibers, required for fatigue resistance, are less sensitive to androgen withdrawal. Testosterone can increase the cross-sectional area of both type I (slow) and type II (fast) twitch fibers, but with different dose sensitivities.  Consistent with previous findings of differential fiber-type effects of androgens in humans, we have shown similar fiber-type-specific effects in our AR∆ZF2 mouse model.  This model has an exon 3 deletion that abolishes DNA binding activity, but retains ligand binding ability and potential non-genomic activity,  and shows that the AR is required for maximum contractile strength in male fast-twitch extensor digitorum longus (EDL) but not slow-twitch soleus (SOL) muscle; whereas, the AR reduces fatigue resistance in slow- but not fast-twitch muscle.  In rodents, different muscles also differ in their androgen responsiveness. The rodent levator ani (LA) muscle, which in males surrounds the rectum adjacent to the anus, is highly responsive to androgens compared to other skeletal muscles,  with orchidectomy in mice reducing LA mass by 85%.  However, the LA is not representative of most skeletal muscles, as hind-limb muscle mass is only reduced by 13%-16% following orchidectomy.  Thus, the LA muscle may provide a greater response to identify similar effects of smaller magnitude in other skeletal muscles, or may have a unique response that is not typical or representative of all muscles.
We have previously identified AR-regulated genes expressed in skeletal muscle using our AR∆ZF2 mouse model.  Microarray analysis on AR∆ZF2 gastrocnemius (GAST) muscle identified a suite of 96 differentially regulated genes, including genes involved in the polyamine biosynthesis pathway, such as Odc1 (ornithine decarboxylase 1). , A subset of these genes were validated by quantitative real-time PCR in AR∆ZF2 male muscle compared to wildtype (WT) and many, but not all, were regulated by androgens in adult male muscle, showing differential expression in orchidectomized WT males treated with testosterone compared to control orchidectomized males.  These genes may be direct AR target genes, or regulated as a secondary consequence of loss of AR DNA binding function. Another way to identify AR-regulated genes in muscle is to use the candidate gene approach. The myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs): MyoD1, Myf5, Myf6 and myogenin, are critical for muscle development. Fbxo32 (MAFbx/atrogin1), an important ubiquitin ligase, is another candidate as it induces muscle atrophy by increasing proteolysis,  and has been shown to be regulated by androgens in a model of glucocorticoid-induced muscle atrophy.  In addition, c-Myc, a potent regulator of proliferation in a number of systems, is regulated by androgens in the rat prostate gland  and has increased expression during hypertrophy in rat skeletal muscle. 
The aim of the current study is to identify and investigate the expression pattern of potential AR-regulated genes in skeletal muscle. One of the limitations of previous studies to identify AR-regulated genes has been the validity of the models used. In vitro studies have examined a number of different cell lines with different levels of AR expression and different proliferative status. In vivo studies have used different lengths of treatment and determined expression in different muscles that may not be representative of postural and locomotive muscles. To overcome these limitations, we used a combination of different models to examine gene expression in the current study. These include human skeletal muscle cell (SkMC) myocytes treated with the non-aromatizable androgen dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in vitro to identify direct androgen effects on gene expression, our previously described orchidectomy model , to identify androgen regulation of genes in adult muscle and our global AR∆ZF2 model to identify genes dependent on the DNA binding-dependent actions of the AR during development and in adult muscle.  We also investigated gene expression in normal muscle homeostasis, by comparing gene expression during embryonic development, in sexually immature and adult mice and also in males compared to females. In addition, we also compared gene expression in the LA and hind-limb muscles of different fiber types to determine how representative the androgen-sensitive LA muscle is of the locomotor muscles, and if expression differs in slow- and fast-twitch muscles.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Human SkMC myocytes were cultured as myoblasts in skeletal muscle growth media, or as myotubes in differentiation media containing Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 3% horse serum. For androgen treatment studies, SkMC were cultured as myoblasts or myotubes for 24 h, then media was replaced with media containing charcoal-stripped horse serum supplemented with vehicle (0.1% ethanol) or 10 nmol l−1 DHT (n ≥ 5) for 12 or 24 h.
To determine the effect of orchidectomy and testosterone replacement on gene expression, we used RNA from GAST muscle of WT C57BL/6 males aged 18-19 weeks that had undergone orchidectomy (orx) aged 8-9 weeks and been treated with control (orx control) (n = 9) or testosterone-filled implants (orx + T) (n = 9) for 10 weeks, as previously described. , Testosterone-filled implants delivered a supraphysiological dose, as previously described. 
To determine the effect of global deletion of the DNA binding-dependent actions of the AR, we used RNA from GAST muscle of WT (n = 6) and AR∆ZF2 (n = 6) male littermates aged 9 weeks, on a congenic C57BL/6 background, as previously described. 
To examine gene expression during development, WT C57BL/6 mice were examined at embryonic day (E) 18.5 (n = 10 males, n = 9 females), in sexually immature mice, aged 4 weeks (n = 6 males, n = 6 females) and in adult mice, aged 12 weeks (n = 5 males, n = 5 females). Muscles including mixed fiber GAST, the fast-twitch EDL and the slow-twitch SOL were dissected from the hind-limbs of both males and females, and the LA was dissected from the perineum of males. For embryos, all hind-limb muscles were combined, due to their small size. Muscles were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at -80°C for subsequent RNA extraction.
Mice were housed in a conventional facility, and standard chow and water provided ad libitum. Studies were performed with the approval of the Austin Health Animal Ethics Committee.
Total RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis were performed using standard methodology as described.  Quantitative real-time PCR was performed in duplicate using 500 ng cDNA and TaqMan gene expression assays (Applied Biosystems, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia). C T values were normalized to a house keeping gene, either 18S or β-actin, and a reference cDNA control using the ∆∆C T method as described.  The following human and mouse expression assays were used: AR (Hs00907244_m1) (Mm0138475_m1), 18S (4319413E), b-actin (Mm00607939_s1), MyoD1 (Hs00159528_m1) (Mm00440387_m1), Myf5 (Hs00929416_g1) (Mm00435125_m1), myogenin (Hs00231167_m1) (Mm00446194_m1), Myf6 (Hs00231165_m1) (Mm00435126_m1), Fbxo32 (Hs01041408_m1) (Mm01207878_m1), c-Myc (Hs00153408_m1) (Mm00487804_m1), Tceal7 (Hs00385936_m1) (Mm01300577_g1), Cdkn1c (p57 Kip2 ) (Hs00911652_s1) (Mm00438170_m1), Igf2 (Hs00277496_s1) (Mm00439564_m1) and calcineurin Aa (Hs00174223_m1) (Mm01317678_m1).
Student's t-test was used to compare the mean gene expression values of two groups (myoblast versus myotube, vehicle versus DHT, orx versus orx + T and WT versus AR∆ZF2 ), with Levene's test of homogeneity used to determine equal or unequal variance. To determine the effect of age and gender on gene expression, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. To determine the effect of muscle type on gene expression, the mean values of different muscle types were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's or Tamhane's post hoc test (equal or unequal variance) using IBM SPSS version 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A value of P < 0.05 was used to identify significance.
| Results|| |
The AR regulates its own gene expression
To determine if the AR gene is autologously regulated by androgens in muscle, we first examined regulation in vitro using the human myocyte cell line, SkMC, which we have previously shown expresses AR levels similar to human muscle.  AR mRNA was up-regulated in myotubes compared to myoblasts [Figure 1]a. However, AR gene expression was not regulated by 12 or 24 h DHT treatment of either SkMC myoblasts or myotubes in vitro [Figure 1]b.
|Figure 1: Relative AR gene expression. AR gene expression in ( a ) SkMC cultured as myoblasts in proliferation media (n = 9) or as myotubes in differentiation media (n = 10) for 24 h, normalized to myoblasts, *P < 0.05 vs SkMC myoblasts; ( b ) SkMC cultured in proliferation (myoblasts) or differentiation (myotubes) media and treated with 10 nmol l -1 DHT or vehicle (n ³ 5 per group) for 12 and 24 h, normalized to myoblast 12 h vehicle; ( c ) GAST muscle of 18- to 19-week-old male mice following orchidectomy with control implants (orx control) at 8– 9 weeks or orchidectomy with testosterone implants (orx + T) (n = 9 per group), normalized to orx control (model previously described 26 ), *P < 0.05 vs orx control; ( d ) GAST muscle of 9-week-old ARDZF2 male mice and WT male littermates (n = 6 per group), normalized to WT (model previously described 24 ), *P < 0.05 vs WT; ( e ) WT male and female mice at E18.5 (all hind-limb muscles) (n ³ 9 per group), 4 weeks (GAST muscle) (n = 6 per group) and 12 weeks (GAST muscle) (n = 5 per group), normalized to 12 week males, #P < 0.05 vs E18.5 sex-matched control, §P < 0.05 vs 4 week sex-matched control and ( f ) 12-week-old male muscles (GAST, EDL, SOL, LA) (n=5 per group), normalized to GAST. **P < 0.001 vs GAST, EDL, SOL. All data are mean ± s.e.m. and one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test (age) and Student's t-test (sex) or Student's t-test (muscle) applied.|
AR: androgen receptor; DHT: dihydrotestosterone; EDL: extensor digitorum longus; GAST: gastrocnemius; s.e.m.: standard error of the mean; LA: levator ani; orx: orchidectomy; SOL: soleus; SkMC: skeletal muscle cells; WT: wildtype.
Click here to view
In contrast, AR gene expression was repressed by androgens and the AR in muscle in vivo, with AR mRNA levels decreased in muscle from testosterone-treated orchidectomized males compared to control orchidectomized males [Figure 1]c, and increased in AR∆ZF2 males compared to WT male controls [Figure 1]d. We have also previously shown that testosterone levels are modestly decreased in AR∆ZF2 males compared to WT males. 
We examined the expression of the AR gene during normal muscle homeostasis, to determine if expression is regulated by developmental stage or gender. We compared AR expression in hind-limb muscles of WT C57BL/6 male and female mice from three different ages; during embryonic development (E18.5), in sexually immature mice aged 4 weeks and in adult mice aged 12 weeks. Two-way ANOVA, to determine if there was an effect of age or gender, showed that there was a significant effect of age but no effect of gender. The expression level of AR in muscle was very low at E18.5; was higher in both males and females aged 4 weeks (P < 0.05) and was highest in 12-week-old males and females (P < 0.05) [Figure 1]e.
To determine if there was any difference in AR gene expression in muscles of three different fiber-types or anatomical location in males, we measured expression in three hind-limb muscles, the mixed fiber GAST, the fast-twitch EDL and the slow-twitch SOL, and in the highly androgen-sensitive perineal muscle, the LA. AR expression was higher in the LA compared to the hind-limb muscles, but there was no effect of fiber composition, with no difference between mixed, fast- or slow-twitch hind-limb muscles in males [Figure 1]f.
Investigating MRFs as AR-regulated genes
We examined the possible androgen regulation of the MRF genes MyoD1, Myf5, Myf6 and myogenin in SkMC myoblasts and myotubes. MyoD1 expression was increased by DHT in SkMC myoblasts following both 12 and 24 h of treatment [Figure 2]a. In contrast, Myf5 expression was decreased by DHT in myoblasts at 12 h [Figure 2]b. Myf6 expression was also decreased by DHT in myoblasts at 12 h, but increased in myoblasts by DHT at 24 h [Figure 2]c. Myogenin expression was not regulated by DHT in vitro [Figure 2]d. To determine if these genes were regulated by androgens in adult skeletal muscle, we examined their expression in orchidectomized males treated with or without testosterone. Despite the fact that MyoD1, Myf5 and Myf6 were regulated by DHT in SkMC myoblasts in vitro, they were not regulated by orchidectomy and testosterone in vivo [Figure 2]e. In contrast, despite the fact that myogenin was not regulated in vitro, in vivo expression was decreased in muscle from testosterone-treated orchidectomized males compared to control orchidectomized males [Figure 2]e. Similarly, there was no difference in the expression of MyoD1, Myf5 and Myf6 in AR∆ZF2 male muscle compared to control [Figure 2]f, but myogenin mRNA levels were higher in AR∆ZF2 muscle than WT controls [Figure 2]f.
|Figure 2: Expression patterns of MRFs. Gene expression in SkMC cultured in proliferation (myoblasts) or differentiation (myotubes) media and treated with 10 nmol l -1 DHT or vehicle (n ≥ 5 per group) for 12 and 24 h, normalized to myoblast 12 h vehicle: ( a ) MyoD1, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs vehicle, ( b ) Myf5, **P < 0.001 vs vehicle, ( c ) Myf6, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs vehicle and ( d ) myogenin. MRF expression in ( e ) 18- to 19-week-old male mice following orchidectomy with control implants (orx control) at 8– 9 weeks or orchidectomy with testosterone implants (orx + T) (n = 9 per group), normalized to orx control, *P < 0.05 vs orx control and ( f ) 9-week-old AR∆ZF2 male mice and WT male littermates (n = 6 per group), normalized to WT, **P < 0.001 vs WT. All data are mean ± s.e.m., Student's t-test applied.|
AR: androgen receptor; DHT: dihydrotestosterone; MRFs: myogenic regulatory factors; orx: orchidectomy; SkMC: skeletal muscle cells; WT: wildtype.
Click here to view
We examined the patterns of expression of the MRFs during development in males and females in different muscle types. There was no difference in expression prior to puberty (at E18.5 and 4 weeks of age), but in adults, levels of MyoD1, Myf5, Myf6 and myogenin were all lower in males than in females [Figure 3]a - d.
|Figure 3: In vivo gene expression of MRFs. Gene expression in WT male and female mice at E18.5 (all hind-limb muscles) (n ≥ 9 per group), 4 weeks (GAST muscle) (n = 6 per group) and 12 weeks (GAST muscle) (n = 5 per group), normalized to 12 week males: ( a ) MyoD1, #P < 0.05 vs E18.5 sex-matched control, §P < 0.05 vs 4 week sex-matched control, *P < 0.05 vs age-matched group, ( b ) Myf5, #P < 0.05 vs E18.5 sex-matched control, §P < 0.05 vs 4 week sex-matched control, *P < 0.05 vs age-matched group, ( c ) Myf6, #P < 0.05 vs E18.5 sex-matched control, §P < 0.05 vs 4 week sex-matched control, *P < 0.05 vs age-matched group, ( d ) myogenin, #P < 0.05 vs E18.5 sex-matched control, §P < 0.05 vs 4 week sex-matched control, *P < 0.05 vs age-matched group. Gene expression in 12-week-old male mice muscle (GAST, EDL, SOL, LA) (n = 5 per group), normalized to GAST, ( e ) MyoD1, **P < 0.001 vs GAST, EDL, SOL, †P < 0.05, ††P < 0.001 vs SOL, ( f ) Myf5, **P < 0.001 vs GAST, EDL, SOL, †P < 0.05 vs SOL, ( g ) Myf6, **P < 0.001 vs GAST, EDL, SOL and ( h ) myogenin, **P < 0.001 vs GAST, EDL, SOL, †P < 0.05 vs SOL. All data are mean ± s.e.m., one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test (age) and Student's t-test (sex) or Student's t-test (muscle) applied.|
EDL: extensor digitorum longus; GAST: gastrocnemius; s.e.m.: standard error of the mean; LA: levator ani; MRFs: myogenic regulatory factors; SOL: soleus; SkMC: skeletal muscle cells; WT: wildtype.
Click here to view
In 12-week-old males, MyoD1 expression was higher in LA muscle compared to the hind-limb muscles, and expression was also higher in the fast-twitch EDL and the mixed fiber GAST compared to the slow-twitch SOL [Figure 3]e. Myf5 expression was higher in the LA than in the hind-limb muscles [Figure 3]f. Myf5 expression was lower in the EDL than the SOL and also lower in the GAST compared to the SOL [Figure 3]f. Myf6 expression was higher in the LA compared to the hind-limb muscles, with no difference in expression between different hind-limb muscles [Figure 3]g. Myogenin expression was also higher in the LA compared to the hind-limb muscles [Figure 3]h, with expression being lower in the EDL than in the SOL [Figure 3]h.
Investigating regulators of muscle atrophy and myoblast proliferation as AR-regulated genes
We next examined the androgen regulation of the atrophy regulator Fbxo32 and the regulator of proliferation c-Myc. Fbxo32 expression was decreased by DHT treatment in myoblasts, at both 12 and 24 h [Figure 4]a, but although basal expression of Fbxo32 was higher in myotubes, it was not regulated by DHT in these cells. c-Myc was not regulated by androgens in vitro [Figure 4]b.
|Figure 4: Relative Fbxo32 and c-Myc gene expression. Gene expression in SkMC cultured in proliferation (myoblasts) or differentiation (myotubes) media and treated with 10 nmol l -1 DHT (n ≥ 8 per group) or vehicle (n ≥ 6 per group) for 12 and 24 h, normalized to myoblasts 12 h vehicle: ( a ) Fbxo32, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs vehicle and ( b ) c-Myc. Fbxo32/c-Myc expression in ( c ) 18- to 19-week-old male mice following orchidectomy with control implants (orx control) at 8– 9 weeks or orchidectomy with testosterone implants (orx + T) (n = 9 per group), normalized to orx control, *P < 0.05 vs orx control and ( d ) 9-week-old AR∆ZF2 male mice and WT male littermates (n = 6 per group), normalized to WT, **P < 0.01 vs WT. All data are mean ± s.e.m., Student's t-test applied.|
AR: androgen receptor; DHT: dihydrotestosterone; orx: orchidectomy; s.e.m.: standard error of the mean; SkMC: skeletal muscle cells; WT: wildtype.
Click here to view
Despite the fact that Fbxo32 was repressed by DHT in SkMC myoblasts, expression of Fbxo32 in muscle was not altered by orchidectomy and testosterone treatment [Figure 4]c or AR∆ZF2 [Figure 4]d. In contrast, expression of c-Myc was decreased in muscle of testosterone-treated orchidectomized males compared to control orchidectomized males [Figure 4]c, and increased in AR∆ZF2 males compared to WT controls [Figure 4]d, suggesting c-Myc is repressed by androgens via the AR.
Expression levels of Fbxo32 in muscle were higher in adults compared to embryonic or 4-week-old mice consistent with the fact that adult muscle comprised predominantly post-proliferative myotubes or myofibers. There is no difference in expression between male and female prepubertally, but Fbxo32 levels were lower in males than females at 12 weeks of age [Figure 5]a. Despite the fact that muscle cell proliferation is higher prenatally than postnatally, levels of c-Myc in muscle were higher at 4 weeks of age compared to E18.5 consistent with the orchidectomy and AR∆ZF2 data suggesting androgens repress c-Myc in adult muscle. c-Myc expression was lower in males compared to females at 12 weeks of age [Figure 5]b.
|Figure 5: In vivo Fbxo32 and c-Myc gene expression. Gene expression in WT male and female mice at E18.5 (all hind-limb muscles) (n ≥ 9 per group), 4 weeks (GAST muscle) (n = 6 per group) and 12 weeks (GAST muscle) (n = 5 per group), normalized to 12 week males: ( a ) Fbxo32, #P < 0.05 vs E18.5 sex-matched control, §P < 0.05 vs 4 week sex-matched control, *P < 0.05 vs age-matched group and ( b ) c-Myc, #P < 0.05 vs E18.5 sex-matched control, *P < 0.05 vs age-matched group. Gene expression in 12-week-old male mice muscle (GAST, EDL, SOL, LA) (n = 5 per group): ( c ) Fbxo32, *P < 0.05 vs EDL and ( d ) c-Myc, **P < 0.001 vs GAST, EDL, SOL. All data are mean ± s.e.m., one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test (age) and Student's t-test (sex) or Student's t-test (muscle) applied.|
EDL: extensor digitorum longus; GAST: gastrocnemius; s.e.m.: standard error of the mean; LA: levator ani; SOL: soleus; WT: wildtype.
Click here to view
Fbxo32 expression was lower in the LA compared to the EDL muscle [Figure 5]c, but there was no significant difference between the LA and other hind-limb muscles. c-Myc expression was higher in the LA than in all the hind-limb muscles [Figure 5]d.
Investigating regulators of myoblast differentiation as AR-regulated genes
We examined the expression of four genes that regulate the transition of muscle cells from the proliferative to the differentiated state, Tceal7 , p57 Kip2 (p57) , Igf2, and calcineurin Aa. We have previously shown that levels of these four genes are higher in AR∆ZF2 males than in WT male controls, and that expression of Tceal7, Igf2 and calcineurin Aa, but not p57, is decreased in muscle from testosterone-treated orchidectomized males compared to control orchidectomized males.  Tceal7 was decreased in SkMC myoblasts following 12 h of DHT treatment, but increased following 24 h of DHT treatment [Figure 6]a. p57 expression was decreased following 12 h of DHT treatment in SkMC myoblasts [Figure 6]b. There was no regulation of Igf2 or calcineurin Aa expression by androgens in vitro [Figure 6]c and d.
|Figure 6: In vitro expression patterns of genes involved in the regulation of muscle cell proliferation to differentiation. Gene expression in SkMC cultured in proliferation (myoblasts) or differentiation (myotubes) media and treated with 10 nmol l -1 DHT (n ≥ 8 per group) or vehicle (n ≥ 6 per group) for 12 and 24 h, normalized to myoblasts 12 h vehicle: ( a ) Tceal7, *P < 0.05 vs vehicle, ( b ) p57, **P < 0.001 vs vehicle, ( c ) Igf2 and ( d ) calcineurin Aa. All data are mean ± s.e.m, Student's t-test applied.|
DHT: dihydrotestosterone; s.e.m.: standard error of the mean; SkMC: skeletal muscle cells.
Click here to view
The expression of Tceal7 decreased with age, with highest expression in embryonic muscle. In adults, Tceal7 expression was lower in males compared to females at 12 weeks [Figure 7]a. p57 expression also decreased with age, and was higher in males than in females at 4 weeks of age and lower in males than in females at 12 weeks of age [Figure 7]b. Similarly, the expression of Igf2 also decreased with age and was lower in males than females at 4 and 12 weeks of age [Figure 7]c. In contrast, expression levels of calcineurin Aa increased with age and were lower in males than females at 4 and 12 weeks of age [Figure 7]d.
|Figure 7: In vivo expression patterns of genes involved in the regulation of muscle cell proliferation to differentiation. Gene expression in WT male and female mice at E18.5 (all hind-limb muscles) (n ≥ 9 per group), 4 weeks (GAST muscle) (n = 6 per group) and 12 weeks (GAST muscle) (n = 5 per group), normalized to 12 week males. ( a ) Tceal7, ( b ) p57, ( c ) Igf2 and ( d ) calcineurin Aa, #P < 0.05 vs E18.5 sex-matched control, §P < 0.05 vs 4 week sex-matched control, *P < 0.05 vs age-matched group. Gene expression in 12-week-old male mice muscle (GAST, EDL, SOL, LA) (n = 5 per group), normalized to GAST. ( e ) Tceal7, *P < 0.05 vs EDL, SOL, ( f ) p57, *P < 0.05 vs GAST, EDL, SOL, ( g ) Igf2, **P < 0.001 vs GAST, EDL, SOL and ( h ) calcineurin Aa, *P < 0.05 vs GAST, SOL. All data are mean ± s.e.m., one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test (age) and Student's t-test (sex) or Student's t-test (muscle) applied.|
EDL: extensor digitorum longus; GAST: gastrocnemius; s.e.m.: standard error of the mean; LA: levator ani; SOL: soleus; SkMC: skeletal muscle cells; WT: wildtype.
Click here to view
Tceal7 expression was lower in the LA than in the SOL and the EDL [Figure 7]e, whereas in contrast, p57 was higher in the LA compared to the SOL, EDL and GAST [Figure 7]f. Igf2 was higher in the LA compared to the SOL, EDL and GAST [Figure 7]g. Calcineurin Aa expression was higher in the LA than the SOL or GAST [Figure 7]h.
| Discussion|| |
The aims of this study were to identify AR-regulated genes in skeletal muscle, to determine if the same genes are regulated during muscle growth and development as during maintenance of muscle mass in adulthood, to examine expression in normal muscle homeostasis in males and females, and to compare gene expression in different muscle types. All the genes we investigated, which included the MRFs as well as other genes known to control proliferation and/or transition to differentiation, showed regulation by androgens and the AR in at least one system, but regulation differed in the various model systems, highlighting the importance of examining multiple models.
There was increased gene expression in adult AR∆ZF2 male muscle compared to WT for three of the genes examined, namely the AR, myogenin and c-Myc. These genes are downregulated either directly or indirectly via the AR and these effects could either occur during development or in adulthood. In our previous study, we showed that Tceal7, p57, Igf2 and calcineurin Aa were also expressed at higher levels in AR∆ZF2 male muscle compared to WT.  Of these seven genes with elevated expression in the absence of AR DNA-binding activity, all but one, p57, were also repressed when orchidectomized WT males were treated with testosterone. The regulation of these genes by testosterone could potentially occur via the AR or the estrogen receptor (ER), but the fact that these genes were also differentially expressed in AR∆ZF2 demonstrates that they must be regulated by the AR pathway. This demonstrates that the AR, myogenin, c-Myc, Tceal7, Igf2 and calcineurin Aa genes are repressed by androgens and the AR in adult male muscle, and therefore these genes are involved in maintaining peak androgen-dependent muscle mass in adult males. In contrast, the fact that p57 expression was only elevated in the AR∆ZF2 model, but unaffected in testosterone-treated orchidectomized males, suggests that p57 is only repressed by the AR during muscle growth and development, and that this repression is not required to maintain muscle mass during adulthood.
Four of the genes repressed by androgens and the AR regulate the transition of myoblasts from the proliferative to the terminally differentiated state. Myogenin, a MRF, is essential for muscle terminal differentiation  and promotes myotube formation. Tceal7, first identified as an ovarian tumor suppressor, also promotes the switch from myoblast proliferation to differentiation.  Similarly, Igf2 and calcineurin Aa, are associated with myoblast differentiation. ,, During development, tissue growth is a balance of both the rate and number of rounds of cellular proliferation occurring prior to terminal differentiation. Our data suggest that during muscle development in males, the androgen/AR pathway maintains myoblasts in the proliferative state by delaying myotube formation. This would allow the formation of additional myoblasts prior to fusion into myofibers, resulting in an overall increase in muscle size and mass.
The one gene that does not fit this pattern of the negative regulation of AR-regulated genes delaying terminal myoblast differentiation is the proto-oncogene c-Myc, which controls cellular proliferation in many tissues including skeletal muscle. , Our data show that c-Myc expression is repressed by the androgen/AR pathway in muscle, which is consistent with studies showing that c-Myc is repressed by androgens in the ventral prostate. , However, c-Myc usually promotes cellular proliferation, ,, therefore the increase in c-Myc expression in AR∆ZF2 and orchidectomized control males would be expected to increase muscle growth. Increased c-Myc expression has been associated with compensatory hypertrophy and β-agonist-induced hypertrophy.  Therefore, the increased c-Myc expression in orchidectomized control and AR∆ZF2 males may be a compensatory mechanism attempting to stimulate muscle growth in the absence of androgens and the AR. The lack of hypertrophic response despite the increased c-Myc expression in AR∆ZF2 and control orchidectomized males could therefore indicate that androgens regulate a downstream effector of c-Myc, and thus the elevated c-Myc is unable to stimulate proliferation in these muscles. It has been shown that increased Tceal7 levels inhibit c-Myc transcriptional activity.  Therefore, the concomitant elevation of Tceal7 expression in the AR∆ZF2 and control orchidectomized males could be one mechanism for the lack of proliferative and hypertrophic effect of the increased c-Myc expression.
In adult males, the increased expression of myogenin in muscle of control orchidectomized males compared to testosterone-treated males is similar to the upregulation of myogenin that occurs during denervation-induced atrophy.  In addition to its role as an MRF during development, myogenin controls neurogenic atrophy by upregulating the ubiquitin ligases Fbxo32 and MuRF1 that promote muscle protein ubiquitination and degradation. , Although we did not see any changes in Fbxo32 expression in vivo, expression of Fbxo32 was repressed by DHT in myoblasts in vitro. Other orchidectomy studies have shown upregulation of Fbxo32 expression in muscle, , with increased muscle protein degradation during atrophy,  while androgen treatment increases muscle protein synthesis.  Therefore, it is possible that androgen withdrawal-dependent atrophy occurs in part via the same myogenin-dependent ubiquitin ligase pathways activated in neurogenic atrophy, due to the loss of myogenin and Fbxo32 repression by the AR.
In addition to its role in muscle differentiation, calcineurin signaling also regulates fiber-type determination. Calcineurin signaling upregulates genes of the slow fiber phenotype,  with inhibition of calcineurin signaling inhibiting the induction of slow fiber phenotype.  The repression of calcineurin Aa by androgens and the AR in adult male muscle, and the lower expression in adult males than females, is therefore likely to maintain more fast-twitch and fewer slow-twitch muscle fibers in males. This is consistent with our previous data showing that the slow-twitch SOL muscle of female mice is more fatigue-resistant than males, and male AR∆ZF2 SOL fatigue resistance is equivalent to female. 
There was no consistent pattern between the in vitro androgen regulation of gene expression and the regulation observed in vivo. For example, of the genes repressed by androgens and the AR in the AR∆ZF2 and orchidectomy models, only one, Tceal7, also showed repression by DHT in SkMC myoblasts, and only after 12 h of treatment. This suggests that Tceal7 is a direct target of the AR in myoblasts. As previously discussed, Tceal7 represses myoblast proliferation and enhances differentiation into myotubes,  suggesting the AR may regulate myoblast transition from proliferation to differentiation directly via Tceal7. A number of genes regulated by DHT in vitro showed no change in AR∆ZF2 or orchidectomy models, including MyoD1, Myf5, Myf6 and Fbxo32. This could be due to a number of factors, including the genes being rapidly regulated by androgens and the AR but then reaching equilibrium in the in vivo models by the time they were examined, or the fact that these genes may have developmental effects only when myoblast cell numbers are highest whereas adult muscle is mostly composed of myofibers. In addition, SkMC may not been a good model for physiological myocytes, as they suffer the limitation of all in vitro models, having been selected for the ability for continuous proliferation in vitro, and thus may not retain the characteristics of in vivo muscle cells, despite the fact that they express the AR gene at similar levels to normal muscle.  A previous study using non-quantitative Western analysis of C2C12 cells stably transfected with the AR suggested testosterone may increase myogenin protein levels,  in contrast to the lack of effect of DHT on myogenin mRNA levels in SkMC, but the repression of myogenin by the androgen/AR pathway in vivo in our study. The variation in results in vitro may be due to the different methodologies and different cell lines examined. More generally, the observation of differences between results in vitro and in vivo emphasizes the importance of examining gene expression in multiple model systems to determine the expression and regulation of genes in normal physiology.
Expression levels of myogenin, Tceal7, p57 and Igf2 decreased with age, concomitant with the rise in serum testosterone levels that occurs in male mice during post-natal development, reaching a peak in adulthood.  Therefore, one of the factors contributing to the downregulation of these genes in adulthood could be an increase in the AR-mediated repression. In contrast, the levels of calcineurin Aa and the MRFs MyoD1 and Myf6 were relatively low in embryonic mice, and increased with age. The fact that Tceal7 expression is lower in adult LA muscle compared to other skeletal muscles could be because AR expression is higher in adult male LA muscle compared to other skeletal muscles, resulting in greater repression of Tceal7 expression in the LA than other muscles.
We also examined gene expression in normal male and female muscle, and a number of genes that we showed were repressed by androgens in AR∆ZF2 males and the orchidectomy model also had lower expression in adult males compared with females, including myogenin, c-Myc, Tceal7 and Igf2. This supports the hypothesis that these genes are repressed by androgens during normal muscle homeostasis in adult males. There was no difference in the expression of other genes; therefore, factors other than androgens and the AR are likely to be more important for regulation of their expression. Gender differences in expression for genes not regulated in AR∆ZF2 and orchidectomy models are most likely due to ER-mediated effects.
When comparing the expression pattern of genes in the LA compared to hind-limb skeletal muscles, the LA had the highest expression of all the MRF genes, as well as c-Myc, p57, Igf2 and calcineurin Aa, but lower expression of Fbxo32 and Tceal7. These data demonstrate that LA gene expression patterns are not representative of other skeletal muscle. Animal studies show that there is an increased density of AR in the myonuclei of the LA compared to other muscle such as the EDL, , and our study confirms that the AR gene is expressed at higher levels in the LA than all hind-limb muscles. These data may explain the differences in expression of AR-regulated genes in the LA compared to the other muscles. Therefore, our results suggest that LA muscle may not be a good representative model for studying androgen-dependent pathways of importance to developing therapies with effects on locomotor and postural muscles.
In conclusion, we have used a number of different in vitro and in vivo models to determine AR-regulated gene expression in skeletal muscle, and have demonstrated that the AR, myogenin, c-Myc, Tceal7, Igf2 and calcineurin Aa are repressed by the androgens and the AR. Furthermore, this study identified gender differences in the expression of genes including myogenin, c-Myc, Tceal7 and Igf2, and showed that LA gene expression patterns are not representative of other skeletal muscle. There is considerable overlap in the genes that are regulated by the AR throughout development, and by androgens in adult males. Our data suggest that androgens regulate the development of peak muscle mass in males via AR-mediated repression of myogenin, c-Myc, Tceal7, p57, Igf2 and calcineurin Aa through delaying the transition of myoblasts from proliferation to differentiation. In addition, we propose that in adult male muscle, androgens and the AR repress myogenin, Fbxo32, c-Myc, Tceal7, Igf2 and calcineurin Aa expression, resulting in suppression of myogenin/ubiquitin ligase-mediated atrophy pathways to preserve muscle mass and maintaining a tendency towards a more fast-twitch phenotype in male muscle. The development of strategies to target the activation of these molecules and signaling pathways specifically in skeletal muscle may therefore be useful in the search for anabolic therapies to treat disorders of low muscle mass.
| Author Contributions|| |
KR performed data analysis and drafted the manuscript. NKLL performed all gene expression studies. JDZ participated in the coordination of the study. HEM conceived the study, participated in the design, coordination of the study and drafting of the manuscript.
| Competing Interests|| |
The authors declare no competing interests.
| Acknowledgments|| |
This work was supported by the University of Melbourne Research Grant Support Scheme, an Eva and Les Erdi Major Research Grant and the Sir Edward Dunlop Medical Research Foundation.
| References|| |
|1.||MacLean HE, Handelsman DJ. Unraveling androgen action in muscle: Genetic tools probing cellular mechanisms. Endocrinology 2009; 150: 3437−9. |
|2.||Basaria S, Coviello AD, Travison TG, Storer TW, Farwell WR, et al. Adverse events associated with testosterone administration. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 109−22. |
|3.||Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, Yarasheski KE, Clevenger B, et al. Testosterone replacement increases fat-free mass and muscle size in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82: 407−13. |
|4.||Wang C, Eyre DR, Clark R, Kleinberg D, Newman C, et al. Sublingual testosterone replacement improves muscle mass and strength, decreases bone resorption, and increases bone formation markers in hypogonadal men--a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996; 81: 3654−62. |
|5.||Wang C, Swerdloff RS, Iranmanesh A, Dobs A, Snyder PJ, et al. Transdermal testosterone gel improves sexual function, mood, muscle strength, and body composition parameters in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85: 2839−53. |
|6.||Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, Callegari C, Clevenger B, et al. The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1−7. |
|7.||Snyder PJ, Peachey H, Hannoush P, Berlin JA, Loh L, et al. Effect of testosterone treatment on body composition and muscle strength in men over 65 years of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84: 2647−53. |
|8.||Hamilton EJ, Gianatti E, Strauss BJ, Wentworth J, Lim-Joon D, et al. Increase in visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat in men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Clin Endocrinol 2011; 74: 377−83. |
|9.||Mauras N, Hayes V, Welch S, Rini A, Helgeson K, et al. Testosterone deficiency in young men: marked alterations in whole body protein kinetics, strength, and adiposity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83: 1886−92. |
|10.||Basaria S, Lieb J II, Tang AM, DeWeese T, Carducci M, et al. Long-term effects of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients. Clin Endocrinol 2002; 56: 779−86. |
|11.||Brinkmann AO, Blok LJ, de Ruiter PE, Doesburg P, Steketee K, et al. Mechanisms of androgen receptor activation and function. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1999; 69: 307−13. |
|12.||Yoshioka M, Boivin A, Ye P, Labrie F, St-Amand J. Effects of dihydrotestosterone on skeletal muscle transcriptome in mice measured by serial analysis of gene expression. J Mol Endocrinol 2006; 36: 247−59. |
|13.||Svensson J, Moverare-Skrtic S, Windahl S, Swanson C, Sjogren K. Stimulation of both estrogen and androgen receptors maintains skeletal muscle mass in gonadectomized male mice but mainly via different pathways. J Mol Endocrinol 2010; 45: 45−57. |
|14.||Yoshioka M, Boivin A, Bolduc C, St-Amand J. Gender difference of androgen actions on skeletal muscle transcriptome. J Mol Endocrinol 2007; 39: 119−33. |
|15.||Singh R, Artaza JN, Taylor WE, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF, Bhasin S. Androgens stimulate myogenic differentiation and inhibit adipogenesis in C3H 10T1/2 pluripotent cells through an androgen receptor-mediated pathway. Endocrinology 2003; 144: 5081−8. |
|16.||Bhasin S, Taylor WE, Singh R, Artaza J, Sinha-Hikim I, et al. The mechanisms of androgen effects on body composition: mesenchymal pluripotent cell as the target of androgen action. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58: M1103−10. |
|17.||Chen Y, Zajac JD, MacLean HE. Androgen regulation of satellite cell function. J Endocrinol 2005; 186: 21−31. |
|18.||Powers ML, Florini JR. A direct effect of testosterone on muscle cells in tissue culture. Endocrinology 1975; 97: 1043−7. |
|19.||Sheffield-Moore M. Androgens and the control of skeletal muscle protein synthesis. Ann Med 2000; 32: 181−6. |
|20.||Storer TW, Miciek R, Travison TG. Muscle function, physical performance and body composition changes in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. Asian J Androl 2012; 14: 204−21. |
|21.||Sinha-Hikim I, Artaza J, Woodhouse L, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Singh AB, et al. Testosterone-induced increase in muscle size in healthy young men is associated with muscle fiber hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2002; 283: E154−64. |
|22.||Notini AJ, Davey RA, McManus JF, Bate KL, Zajac JD. Genomic actions of the androgen receptor are required for normal male sexual differentiation in a mouse model. J Mol Endocrinol 2005; 35: 547−55. |
|23.||Pang TP, Clarke MV, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Lee NK, Davey RA, et al. A physiological role for androgen actions in the absence of androgen receptor DNA binding activity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2011; 348: 189−97. |
|24.||MacLean HE, Chiu WS, Notini AJ, Axell AM, Davey RA, et al. Impaired skeletal muscle development and function in male, but not female, genomic androgen receptor knockout mice. FASEB J 2008; 22: 2676−89. |
|25.||Nnodim JO. Quantitative study of the effects of denervation and castration on the levator ani muscle of the rat. Anat Rec 1999; 255: 324−33. |
|26.||Axell AM, MacLean HE, Plant DR, Harcourt LJ, Davis JA, et al. Continuous testosterone administration prevents skeletal muscle atrophy and enhances resistance to fatigue in orchidectomized male mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2006; 291: E506−16. |
|27.||Lee NK, Skinner JP, Zajac JD, MacLean HE. Ornithine decarboxylase is upregulated by the androgen receptor in skeletal muscle and regulates myoblast proliferation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2011; 301: E172−9. |
|28.||Lagirand-Cantaloube J, Offner N, Csibi A, Leibovitch MP, Batonnet-Pichon S, et al. The initiation factor eIF3-f is a major target for atrogin1/MAFbx function in skeletal muscle atrophy. EMBO J 2008; 27: 1266-76. |
|29.||Zhao W, Pan J, Zhao Z, Wu Y, Bauman WA, et al. Testosterone protects against dexamethasone-induced muscle atrophy, protein degradation and MAFbx upregulation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2008; 110: 125-9. |
|30.||Quarmby VE, Beckman WC, Jr., Wilson EM, French FS. Androgen regulation of c-myc messenger ribonucleic acid levels in rat ventral prostate. Mol Endocrinol 1987; 1: 865-74. |
|31.||Whitelaw PF, Hesketh JE. Expression of c-myc and c-fos in rat skeletal muscle. Evidence for increased levels of c-myc mRNA during hypertrophy. Biochem J 1992; 281: 143-7. |
|32.||MacLean HE, Chiu WM, Ma C, McManus JF, Davey RA, et al. A floxed allele of the androgen receptor gene causes hyperandrogenization in male mice. Physiol Genomics 2008; 33: 133-7. |
|33.||Rana K, Fam BC, Clarke MV, Pang TP, Zajac JD, et al. Increased adiposity in DNA binding-dependent androgen receptor knockout male mice associated with decreased voluntary activity and not insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2011; 301: E767-78. |
|34.||Shi X, Garry DJ. Myogenic regulatory factors transactivate the Tceal7 gene and modulate muscle differentiation. Biochem J 2010; 428: 213-21. |
|35.||Zhang P, Wong C, Liu D, Finegold M, Harper JW, et al. p21(CIP1) and p57(KIP2) control muscle differentiation at the myogenin step. Genes Dev 1999; 13: 213-24. |
|36.||Tollefsen SE, Sadow JL, Rotwein P. Coordinate expression of insulin-like growth factor II and its receptor during muscle differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86: 1543-7. |
|37.||Florini JR, Magri KA, Ewton DZ, James PL, Grindstaff K, et al. "Spontaneous" differentiation of skeletal myoblasts is dependent upon autocrine secretion of insulin-like growth factor-II. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 15917-23. |
|38.||Friday BB, Horsley V, Pavlath GK. Calcineurin activity is required for the initiation of skeletal muscle differentiation. J Cell Biol 2000; 149: 657-66. |
|39.||Hasty P, Bradley A, Morris JH, Edmondson DG, Venuti JM, et al. Muscle deficiency and neonatal death in mice with a targeted mutation in the myogenin gene. Nature 1993; 364: 501-6. |
|40.||Polesskaya A, Cuvellier S, Naguibneva I, Duquet A, Moss EG, et al. Lin-28 binds IGF-2 mRNA and participates in skeletal myogenesis by increasing translation efficiency. Genes Dev 2007; 21: 1125-38. |
|41.||Stewart CE, Rotwein P. Insulin-like growth factor-II is an autocrine survival factor for differentiating myoblasts. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 11330-8. |
|42.||Delling U, Tureckova J, Lim HW, De Windt LJ, Rotwein P, et al. A calcineurin-NFATc3-dependent pathway regulates skeletal muscle differentiation and slow myosin heavy-chain expression. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20: 6600-11. |
|43.||Falcone G, Tato F, Alema S. Distinctive effects of the viral oncogenes myc, erb, fps, and src on the differentiation program of quail myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82: 426-30. |
|44.||Kelly K, Cochran BH, Stiles CD, Leder P. Cell-specific regulation of the c-myc gene by lymphocyte mitogens and platelet-derived growth factor. Cell 1983; 35: 603-10. |
|45.||Lee JH, Sul CK, Kim YK, Hwang BD, Lim K. Differential regulation of protooncogene c-myc expression in rat ventral prostate after castration. Biochem Mol Biol Int 1999; 47: 143-51. |
|46.||Cochran BH, Reffel AC, Stiles CD. Molecular cloning of gene sequences regulated by platelet-derived growth factor. Cell 1983; 33: 939-47. |
|47.||Makino R, Hayashi K, Sugimura T. C-myc transcript is induced in rat liver at a very early stage of regeneration or by cycloheximide treatment. Nature 1984; 310: 697-8. |
|48.||Chien J, Narita K, Rattan R, Giri S, Shridhar R, et al. A role for candidate tumor-suppressor gene TCEAL7 in the regulation of c-Myc activity, cyclin D1 levels and cellular transformation. Oncogene 2008; 27: 7223-34. |
|49.||Moresi V, Williams AH, Meadows E, Flynn JM, Potthoff MJ, et al. Myogenin and class II HDACs control neurogenic muscle atrophy by inducing E3 ubiquitin ligases. Cell 2010; 143: 35-45. |
|50.||Macpherson PC, Wang X, Goldman D. Myogenin regulates denervation-dependent muscle atrophy in mouse soleus muscle. J Cell Biochem 2011; 112: 2149-59. |
|51.||Pires-Oliveira M, Maragno AL, Parreiras-e-Silva LT, Chiavegatti T, Gomes MD, et al. Testosterone represses ubiquitin ligases atrogin-1 and Murf-1 expression in an androgen-sensitive rat skeletal muscle in vivo. J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 266-73. |
|52.||Jiao Q, Pruznak AM, Huber D, Vary TC, Lang CH. Castration differentially alters basal and leucine-stimulated tissue protein synthesis in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2009; 297: E1222-32. |
|53.||Griggs RC, Kingston W, Jozefowicz RF, Herr BE, Forbes G, et al. Effect of testosterone on muscle mass and muscle protein synthesis. J Appl Physiol 1989; 66: 498-503. |
|54.||Naya FJ, Mercer B, Shelton J, Richardson JA, Williams RS, et al. Stimulation of slow skeletal muscle fiber gene expression by calcineurin in vivo. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 4545-8. |
|55.||Kielbasa OM, Reynolds JG, Wu CL, Snyder CM, Cho MY, et al. Myospryn is a calcineurin-interacting protein that negatively modulates slow-fiber-type transformation and skeletal muscle regeneration. FASEB J 2011; 25: 2276-86. |
|56.||Chen Y, Lee NK, Zajac JD, MacLean HE. Generation and analysis of an androgen-responsive myoblast cell line indicates that androgens regulate myotube protein accretion. J Endocrinol Invest 2008; 31: 910-8. |
|57.||Lee DK. Androgen receptor enhances myogenin expression and accelerates differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002; 294: 408-13. |
|58.||Barkley MS, Goldman BD. A quantitative study of serum testosterone, sex accessory organ growth, and the development of intermale aggression in the mouse. Horm Behav 1977; 8: 208-18. |
|59.||Monks DA, O'Bryant EL, Jordan CL. Androgen receptor immunoreactivity in skeletal muscle: enrichment at the neuromuscular junction. J Comp Neurol 2004; 473: 59-72. |
|60.||Johansen JA, Breedlove SM, Jordan CL. Androgen receptor expression in the levator ani muscle of male mice. J Neuroendocrinol 2007; 19: 823-6. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
|This article has been cited by|
||Gene regulation could be attributed to
and other key transcription factors in the muscle of pubertal heifers
| ||Li Yieng Lau,Loan T. Nguyen,Antonio Reverter,Stephen S. Moore,Aaron Lynn,Liam McBride-Kelly,Louis Phillips-Rose,Mackenzie Plath,Rhys Macfarlane,Vanisha Vasudivan,Lachlan Morton,Ryan Ardley,Yunan Ye,Marina R. S. Fortes |
| ||Veterinary Medicine and Science. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Selective Loss of Levator Ani and Leg Muscle Volumes in Men Undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy
| ||Ada S Cheung,Christopher Cunningham,Dong-Kyoon (Daniel) Ko,Vivian Ly,Hans Gray,Rudolf Hoermann,Boyd J G Strauss,Ebrahim Bani Hassan,Gustavo Duque,Peter Ebeling,Marcus G Pandy,Jeffrey D Zajac,Mathis Grossmann |
| ||The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2019; 104(6): 2229 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Androgen receptor antagonism accelerates disease onset in the SOD1
mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
| ||Victoria M. McLeod,Chew L. Lau,Mathew D.F. Chiam,Thusitha W. Rupasinghe,Ute Roessner,Elvan Djouma,Wah C. Boon,Bradley J. Turner |
| ||British Journal of Pharmacology. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Effect of testosterone on the differentiation control of stromal vascular cells isolated from longissimus muscle of Hanwoo beef cattle
| ||Delgerzul Baatar,Hwang Seong Gu |
| ||Meat Science. 2019; : 107916 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Combining multi-OMICs information to identify key-regulator genes for pleiotropic effect on fertility and production traits in beef cattle
| ||Pablo Augusto de Souza Fonseca,Samir Id-Lahoucine,Antonio Reverter,Juan F. Medrano,Marina S. Fortes,Joaquim Casellas,Filippo Miglior,Luiz Brito,Maria Raquel S. Carvalho,Flávio S. Schenkel,Loan T. Nguyen,Laercio R. Porto-Neto,Milton G. Thomas,Angela Cánovas,Peter J. Hansen |
| ||PLOS ONE. 2018; 13(10): e0205295 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Management of bone and metabolic effects of androgen deprivation therapy
| ||Nicholas Russell,Mathis Grossmann |
| ||Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The biological and clinical advances of androgen receptor function in age-related diseases and cancer [Review]
| ||Ken-ichi Takayama |
| ||Endocrine Journal. 2017; 64(10): 933 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Actin alpha cardiac muscle 1 gene expression is upregulated in the skeletal muscle of men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer
| ||Ada S. Cheung,Casey de Rooy,Itamar Levinger,Kesha Rana,Michele V. Clarke,Jackie M. How,Andrew Garnham,Catriona McLean,Jeffrey D. Zajac,Rachel A. Davey,Mathis Grossmann |
| ||The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Role of androgen receptor on cyclic mechanical stretch-regulated proliferation of C2C12 myoblasts and its upstream signals: IGF-1-mediated PI3K/Akt and MAPKs pathways
| ||Yiming Ma,Shaoting Fu,Lin Lu,Xiaohui Wang |
| ||Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2017; 450: 83 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Glycolytic-to-oxidative fiber-type switch and mTOR signaling activation are early-onset features of SBMA muscle modified by high-fat diet
| ||Anna Rocchi,Carmelo Milioto,Sara Parodi,Andrea Armirotti,Doriana Borgia,Matteo Pellegrini,Anna Urciuolo,Sibilla Molon,Valeria Morbidoni,Manuela Marabita,Vanina Romanello,Pamela Gatto,Bert Blaauw,Paolo Bonaldo,Fabio Sambataro,Diane M. Robins,Andrew P. Lieberman,Gianni Sorarů,Lodovica Vergani,Marco Sandri,Maria Pennuto |
| ||Acta Neuropathologica. 2016; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The role of sex steroid hormones in the pathophysiology and treatment of sarcopenia
| ||Yong Jin Kim,Amin Tamadon,Hyun Tae Park,Hoon Kim,Seung-Yup Ku |
| ||Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia. 2016; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Muscle-specific androgen receptor deletion shows limited actions in myoblasts but not in myofibers in different musclesin vivo
| ||Kesha Rana,Maria W S Chiu,Patricia K Russell,Jarrod P Skinner,Nicole K L Lee,Barbara C Fam,Jeffrey D Zajac,Helen E MacLean |
| ||Journal of Molecular Endocrinology. 2016; 57(2): 125 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Castration influences intestinal microflora and induces abdominal obesity in high-fat diet-fed mice
| ||Naoki Harada,Ryo Hanaoka,Hiroko Horiuchi,Tomoya Kitakaze,Takakazu Mitani,Hiroshi Inui,Ryoichi Yamaji |
| ||Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 23001 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Effects of testosterone treatment on markers of skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis
| ||C. B. Mobley,P. W. Mumford,W. C. Kephart,C. F. Conover,L. A. Beggs,A. Balaez,J. F. Yarrow,S. E. Borst,D. T. Beck,M. D. Roberts |
| ||Andrologia. 2016; : n/a |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Targeting muscle signaling pathways to minimize adverse effects of androgen deprivation
| ||Casey de Rooy,Mathis Grossmann,Jeffrey D Zajac,Ada S Cheung |
| ||Endocrine-Related Cancer. 2016; 23(1): R15 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Androgen receptor transcriptionally regulates µ-opioid receptor expression in rat trigeminal ganglia
| ||Ki Seok Lee,Youping Zhang,Jamila Asgar,Q-Schick Auh,Man-Kyo Chung,Jin Y. Ro |
| ||Neuroscience. 2016; 331: 52 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Hematopoietic androgen receptor deficiency promotes visceral fat deposition in male mice without impairing glucose homeostasis
| ||K. B. Rubinow,S. Wang,L. J. den Hartigh,S. Subramanian,G. J. Morton,F. W. Buaas,D. Lamont,N. Gray,R. E. Braun,S. T. Page |
| ||Andrology. 2015; 3(4): 787 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||17ß-Estradiol and testosterone in sarcopenia: Role of satellite cells
| ||Anabela La Colla,Lucía Pronsato,Lorena Milanesi,Andrea Vasconsuelo |
| ||Ageing Research Reviews. 2015; 24: 166 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Allele-selective suppression of mutant genes in polyglutamine diseases
| ||Chia-Rung Liu,Tzu-Hao Cheng |
| ||Journal of Neurogenetics. 2015; 29(2-3): 41 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|